• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻中双 J 支架置入失败:临床特征与结局。

Failure in Double-J stent inserting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the clinical features and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health (NCCH), Beijing, 100045, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01359-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01359-7
PMID:37980482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10657558/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Double-J (DJ) stent placement is an important procedure during laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). Failing to insert the DJ stent may indicate the patient was also complicated with uretero-vesical junction obstruction (UVJO), and surgeons have to change to another alternative drainage method. In the present study, we analyzed the risk factors of failure of DJ stent placement during the LP and reviewed the clinical outcomes of these challenging pyeloplasties.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) who underwent LP in our department from January 2016 to September 2020. For patients who developed a difficult process of inserting the DJ stent, the externalized uretero-pyelostomy (EUP) stent was indwelled. Patients were finally divided into two groups: DJ group and EUP group. The primary outcomes were recurrent UPJO, postoperative uretero-vesical junction obstruction (UVJO) and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 535 patients were included in the study, of which 37 patients (6.9%) failed to insert the DJ stent. Age was younger, and weight was lower (P < 0.05) in the EUP group. Within follow-up, recurrent UPJO occurred in ten (1.87%) patients, nine in the DJ group and one in the EUP group (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative UVJO in the EUP group was significantly higher than in the DJ group (10.8% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.01). 74 patients (13.8%) developed complications after surgery, 12 patients (32.4%) in the EUP group, significantly higher than that in the DJ group (32.4% vs. 12.4%, P < 0.01). Compared with the DJ group, the larger APD were observed in the EUP group at three months postoperatively (3.50 [3.02;4.58] vs. 2.20 [1.50;2.88], P < 0.05), but the difference vanished in further follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The failure of DJ stent placement tends to occur in patients with younger age, lower weight, and larger preoperative APD. Failure may not increase the recurrent UPJO rate, but may indicate a higher probability of postoperative UVJO and may develop more postoperative complications and slower recovery.

摘要

背景

双 J(DJ)支架置入术是腹腔镜肾盂成形术(LP)中的重要步骤。如果无法置入 DJ 支架,则可能表明患者还伴有输尿管-膀胱连接部梗阻(UVJO),此时外科医生需要更换另一种引流方法。本研究分析了 LP 中 DJ 支架置入失败的危险因素,并回顾了这些具有挑战性的肾盂成形术的临床结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月在我科接受 LP 治疗的输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻(UPJO)患者的临床资料。对于置入 DJ 支架过程中出现困难的患者,留置外置输尿管-肾盂支架(EUP)。最终患者分为两组:DJ 组和 EUP 组。主要结局为复发性 UPJO、术后 UVJO 和并发症。

结果

本研究共纳入 535 例患者,其中 37 例(6.9%)患者无法置入 DJ 支架。EUP 组患者年龄较小,体重较轻(P<0.05)。在随访期间,10 例(1.87%)患者发生复发性 UPJO,DJ 组 9 例,EUP 组 1 例(P>0.05)。EUP 组术后 UVJO 的发生率明显高于 DJ 组(10.8%比 0.2%,P<0.01)。74 例(13.8%)患者术后发生并发症,EUP 组 12 例(32.4%),明显高于 DJ 组(12.4%,P<0.01)。与 DJ 组相比,EUP 组术后 3 个月时的 APD 较大(3.50[3.02;4.58]比 2.20[1.50;2.88],P<0.05),但在进一步随访中差异消失。

结论

DJ 支架置入失败倾向于发生在年龄较小、体重较轻和术前 APD 较大的患者中。失败不会增加复发性 UPJO 的发生率,但可能提示术后 UVJO 的发生概率更高,且可能会发生更多的术后并发症,恢复较慢。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55b/10657558/8aedaae9969f/12894_2023_1359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55b/10657558/8aedaae9969f/12894_2023_1359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55b/10657558/8aedaae9969f/12894_2023_1359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Failure in Double-J stent inserting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the clinical features and outcomes.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻中双 J 支架置入失败:临床特征与结局。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01359-7.
2
Double J stent combined with pyelostomy tube in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year clinical experience in a single center.双 J 支架联合肾盂造瘘管在小儿腹腔镜肾盂成形术中的应用:单中心 5 年临床经验。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01351-1.
3
Outcomes and costs analysis of Externalized PyeloUreteral versus internal Double-J ureteral stents after paediatric laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.小儿腹腔镜Anderson-Hynes肾盂成形术后外置肾盂输尿管支架与内置双J输尿管支架的疗效及成本分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):232.e1-232.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Febrile urinary tract infection after Double-J stent removal is associated with restenosis after laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A propensity score matched analysis of 503 children.双J管拔除后发热性尿路感染与腹腔镜肾盂成形术后再狭窄相关:一项对503例儿童的倾向评分匹配分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Apr;19(2):200.e1-200.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.引流技术对小儿肾盂成形术的影响:外置输尿管肾盂造口术与双J管内支架置入术的对比分析
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E453-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2697.
6
Comparison between internal double J and external pyeloureteral stents in open pediatric pyeloplasty: A multicenter study.内双 J 管与外肾盂输尿管支架在开放性小儿肾盂成形术中的比较:一项多中心研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):511.e1-511.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO):技术考虑和结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.儿童机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术中外置肾盂输尿管支架与内置输尿管支架的结果比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Oct;14(5):450.e1-450.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Comparison of DJ stented, external stented and stent-less procedures for pediatric pyeloplasty: A network meta-analysis.对比 DJ 支架置入术、外支架置入术和无支架术治疗小儿肾盂成形术的疗效:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Aug;68:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
10
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Double-J Stent and Nephrostomy With a Transanastomotic Stent in Open Pyeloplasty for Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction in Children: A Prospective Observational Study.双J支架与肾造瘘联合经吻合口支架在儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻开放性肾盂成形术中的比较分析:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2025 Aug 13;17(8):e90035. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90035. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Association between platelet to lymphocyte ratio and febrile urinary tract infection after double-J stent removal in children underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty.接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术的儿童在双J管拔除后血小板与淋巴细胞比值与发热性尿路感染之间的关联。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 13;25(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01808-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center.复发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的再次腹腔镜肾盂成形术:高容量中心的倾向评分匹配分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 8;10:997196. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.997196. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison between internal double J and external pyeloureteral stents in open pediatric pyeloplasty: A multicenter study.内双 J 管与外肾盂输尿管支架在开放性小儿肾盂成形术中的比较:一项多中心研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):511.e1-511.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: A single-center experience of 279 patients and analysis of possible factors affecting complications.
儿童原发性腹腔镜肾盂成形术:279例单中心经验及影响并发症的可能因素分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Jun;16(3):331.e1-331.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Comparison of DJ stented, external stented and stent-less procedures for pediatric pyeloplasty: A network meta-analysis.对比 DJ 支架置入术、外支架置入术和无支架术治疗小儿肾盂成形术的疗效:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Aug;68:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Prospective evaluation of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children in the first 2 years of life: Is age a risk factor for conversion?对出生后2年内儿童进行后腹腔镜肾盂成形术的前瞻性评估:年龄是转为开放手术的危险因素吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):511.e1-511.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Radiation-free monitoring in the long-term follow-up of pyeloplasty: Are ultrasound new parameters good enough to evaluate a successful procedure?肾盂成形术长期随访中的无辐射监测:超声新参数评估手术成功是否足够?
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):230.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.引流技术对小儿肾盂成形术的影响:外置输尿管肾盂造口术与双J管内支架置入术的对比分析
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E453-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2697.
8
Double obstruction of ureter: A diagnostic challenge.输尿管双重梗阻:一项诊断挑战。
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;19(3):129-32. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.136457.
9
Coexisting ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureterovesical junction obstruction: is pyeloplasty always the preferred initial surgery?并存的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻和输尿管膀胱连接部梗阻:肾盂成形术是否一直是首选的初始手术?
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.087. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
10
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Dismembered Pyeloplasty with or without Ureteral Stenting in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻行离断性肾盂成形术加或不加输尿管支架置入术的手术效果比较
Korean J Urol. 2012 Aug;53(8):564-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.564. Epub 2012 Aug 16.