Salvi Carola, Barr Nathaniel, Dunsmoor Joseph E, Grafman Jordan
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.
Department of Psychology and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, Rome, Italy.
Think Reason. 2023;29(4):760-784. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
The information humans are exposed to has grown exponentially. This has placed increased demands upon our information selection strategies resulting in reduced fact-checking and critical-thinking time. Prior research shows that problem solving (traditionally measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test-CRT) negatively correlates with believing in false information. We argue that this result is specifically related to insight problem solving. Solutions via insight are the result of parallel processing, characterized by filtering external noise, and, unlike cognitively controlled thinking, it does not suffer from the cognitive overload associated with processing multiple sources of information. We administered the Compound Remote Associate Test (problems used to investigate insight problem solving) as well as the CRT, 20 fake and real news headlines, the bullshit, and overclaiming scales to a sample of 61 participants. Results show that insight problem solving predicts better identification of fake news and bullshit (over and above traditional measures i.e., the CRT), and is associated with reduced overclaiming. These results have implications for understanding individual differences in susceptibility to believing false information.
人类接触到的信息呈指数级增长。这对我们的信息选择策略提出了更高的要求,导致事实核查和批判性思考的时间减少。先前的研究表明,解决问题(传统上使用认知反思测试-CRT来衡量)与相信错误信息呈负相关。我们认为,这一结果与顿悟式问题解决具体相关。通过顿悟得出的解决方案是并行处理的结果,其特点是过滤外部噪音,并且与认知控制思维不同,它不会受到与处理多个信息源相关的认知过载的影响。我们对61名参与者进行了复合远程联想测试(用于研究顿悟式问题解决的问题)以及CRT、20条真假新闻标题、胡说八道和过度宣称量表。结果表明,顿悟式问题解决能够更好地识别假新闻和胡说八道(超越传统测量方法,即CRT),并且与减少过度宣称有关。这些结果对于理解个体在相信错误信息方面的易感性差异具有启示意义。