Suppr超能文献

洞察力问题解决能力预示着对假新闻、废话和过度夸大的易感性降低。

Insight Problem Solving Ability Predicts Reduced Susceptibility to Fake News, Bullshit, and Overclaiming.

作者信息

Salvi Carola, Barr Nathaniel, Dunsmoor Joseph E, Grafman Jordan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.

Department of Psychology and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Think Reason. 2023;29(4):760-784. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

Abstract

The information humans are exposed to has grown exponentially. This has placed increased demands upon our information selection strategies resulting in reduced fact-checking and critical-thinking time. Prior research shows that problem solving (traditionally measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test-CRT) negatively correlates with believing in false information. We argue that this result is specifically related to insight problem solving. Solutions via insight are the result of parallel processing, characterized by filtering external noise, and, unlike cognitively controlled thinking, it does not suffer from the cognitive overload associated with processing multiple sources of information. We administered the Compound Remote Associate Test (problems used to investigate insight problem solving) as well as the CRT, 20 fake and real news headlines, the bullshit, and overclaiming scales to a sample of 61 participants. Results show that insight problem solving predicts better identification of fake news and bullshit (over and above traditional measures i.e., the CRT), and is associated with reduced overclaiming. These results have implications for understanding individual differences in susceptibility to believing false information.

摘要

人类接触到的信息呈指数级增长。这对我们的信息选择策略提出了更高的要求,导致事实核查和批判性思考的时间减少。先前的研究表明,解决问题(传统上使用认知反思测试-CRT来衡量)与相信错误信息呈负相关。我们认为,这一结果与顿悟式问题解决具体相关。通过顿悟得出的解决方案是并行处理的结果,其特点是过滤外部噪音,并且与认知控制思维不同,它不会受到与处理多个信息源相关的认知过载的影响。我们对61名参与者进行了复合远程联想测试(用于研究顿悟式问题解决的问题)以及CRT、20条真假新闻标题、胡说八道和过度宣称量表。结果表明,顿悟式问题解决能够更好地识别假新闻和胡说八道(超越传统测量方法,即CRT),并且与减少过度宣称有关。这些结果对于理解个体在相信错误信息方面的易感性差异具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Insight Problem Solving Ability Predicts Reduced Susceptibility to Fake News, Bullshit, and Overclaiming.
Think Reason. 2023;29(4):760-784. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Does social rigidity predict cognitive rigidity? Profiles of socio-cognitive polarization.
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2533-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01832-w. Epub 2023 May 6.
8
Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):319. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01813-9. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive flexibility predicts attitudes towards vaccination: evidence from a New Zealand sample.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;12(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02048-2.
2
Does social rigidity predict cognitive rigidity? Profiles of socio-cognitive polarization.
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2533-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01832-w. Epub 2023 May 6.
3
Not Getting Vaccinated? It Is a Matter of Problem-Solving Abilities and Socio-Cognitive Polarization.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031721.

本文引用的文献

2
Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions.
Cogn Emot. 2021 Aug;35(5):918-935. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1908230. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Enhancement of semantic integration reasoning by tRNS.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):736-746. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00885-x. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
6
Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test.
J Creat Behav. 2020 Mar;54(1):62-74. doi: 10.1002/jocb.345. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking.
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104381. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
An insight-related neural reward signal.
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 1;214:116757. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116757. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
TDCS to the right anterior temporal lobe facilitates insight problem-solving.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57724-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验