Suppr超能文献

意大利远距离联想测验的验证

Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test.

作者信息

Salvi Carola, Costantini Giulio, Pace Adriana, Palmiero Massimiliano

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Cognitive Brain Mapping Group, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Creat Behav. 2020 Mar;54(1):62-74. doi: 10.1002/jocb.345. Epub 2018 May 22.

Abstract

The scientific approach to the study of creative problem solving has shifted from using classic insight problems (e.g., the problem), towards sets of problems that have more robust psychometric properties, such as the Remote Associate Test (RAT). Because it is homogeneous, compact, quickly solvable, and easy to score, the RAT has been used more frequently in recent creativity studies. We applied the Item Response Theory (IRT) to develop an Italian version of this task. The final 51-item test was reliable (α = .89) and provided information over a wide range of ability levels, as revealed by the IRT analysis. The RAT correlated with five measures of creative performance: The Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM), three classic insight problems, a set of anagrams purposefully developed, the fluency and flexibility scores of the Alternative Uses Task (AUT), and the Creative Achievements Questionnaire (CAQ). The new measure provided is meant to encourage the study of creativity and problem solving in the Italian language.

摘要

研究创造性问题解决的科学方法已从使用经典的顿悟问题(如[此处原文缺失具体问题]问题),转向使用具有更强心理测量学特性的问题集,如远程联想测验(RAT)。由于RAT具有同质性、紧凑性、可快速解决且易于评分的特点,它在近期的创造力研究中被更频繁地使用。我们应用项目反应理论(IRT)来开发该任务的意大利语版本。最终的51项测试是可靠的(α = 0.89),并且如IRT分析所示,在广泛的能力水平上提供了信息。RAT与五种创造性表现指标相关:瑞文标准渐进矩阵(SPM)、三个经典的顿悟问题、一组特意编制的字谜、替代用途任务(AUT)的流畅性和灵活性得分,以及创造性成就问卷(CAQ)。所提供的新测量方法旨在鼓励用意大利语对创造力和问题解决进行研究。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test.意大利远距离联想测验的验证
J Creat Behav. 2020 Mar;54(1):62-74. doi: 10.1002/jocb.345. Epub 2018 May 22.
10
Development and validation of interactive creativity task platform.交互式创造力任务平台的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:954946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954946. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

8
Enhancement of semantic integration reasoning by tRNS.通过 tRNS 增强语义集成推理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):736-746. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00885-x. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

2
The politics of insight.洞察力的政治学。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1064-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1136338.
3
Visualizer cognitive style enhances visual creativity.视觉化认知风格能提升视觉创造力。
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Feb 26;615:98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.032. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs.突然的顿悟与屏蔽视觉输入有关。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1814-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0.
8
Food for creativity: tyrosine promotes deep thinking.创造力的食粮:酪氨酸促进深度思考。
Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0610-4. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验