• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨英国 COVID-19 大流行期间政府严格程度与预防性行为之间的关系。

Exploring the relationship between government stringency and preventative social behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2023 Oct-Dec;29(4):14604582231215867. doi: 10.1177/14604582231215867.

DOI:10.1177/14604582231215867
PMID:37982397
Abstract

We constructed a preventive social behaviours (PSB) Index using survey questions that were aligned with WHO recommendations, and used linear regression to assess the impact of reported COVID-19 deaths (RCD), people's confidence of government handling of the pandemic (CGH) and government stringency (GS) in the United Kingdom (UK) over time on the PSB index. We used repeated, nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys in the UK over the course of 41 weeks from 1st April 2020 to January 28th, 2021, including a total of 38,092 participants. The PSB index was positively correlated with the logarithm of RCD (R: 0.881, < .001), CGH (R: 0.592, < .001) and GS (R: 0.785, < .001), but was not correlated with time (R: -0.118, = .485). A multivariate linear regression analysis suggests that the log of RCD (coefficient: 0.125, < .001), GS (coefficient: 0.010, = .019), and CGH (coefficient: 0.0.009, < .001) had a positive and significant impact on the PSB Index, while time did not affect it significantly. These findings suggest that people's behaviours could have been affected by multiple factors during the pandemic, with the number of COVID-19 deaths being the largest contributor towards an increase in protective behaviours in our model.

摘要

我们构建了一个预防社会行为(PSB)指数,使用与世界卫生组织建议一致的调查问题,并使用线性回归来评估报告的 COVID-19 死亡人数(RCD)、人们对政府处理大流行的信心(CGH)以及英国政府的严格程度(GS)随时间推移对 PSB 指数的影响。我们在 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 28 日期间,在英国进行了 41 周的重复、全国代表性的横断面调查,共有 38092 名参与者。PSB 指数与 RCD 的对数呈正相关(R:0.881,<0.001)、CGH(R:0.592,<0.001)和 GS(R:0.785,<0.001),但与时间无关(R:-0.118,=0.485)。多元线性回归分析表明,RCD 的对数(系数:0.125,<0.001)、GS(系数:0.010,=0.019)和 CGH(系数:0.009,<0.001)对 PSB 指数有积极且显著的影响,而时间没有显著影响。这些发现表明,在大流行期间,人们的行为可能受到多种因素的影响,我们模型中 COVID-19 死亡人数的增加是导致保护行为增加的最大因素。

相似文献

1
Exploring the relationship between government stringency and preventative social behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.探讨英国 COVID-19 大流行期间政府严格程度与预防性行为之间的关系。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Oct-Dec;29(4):14604582231215867. doi: 10.1177/14604582231215867.
2
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.
3
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
4
Comparing Public Perceptions and Preventive Behaviors During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Survey Study.比较 COVID-19 大流行早期香港和英国的公众认知和预防行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23231. doi: 10.2196/23231.
5
Engagement with protective behaviours in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a series of cross-sectional surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of adherence to interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study).在 COVID-19 大流行期间英国采取防护行为的情况:一系列横断面调查(COVID-19 干预措施和反应依从性快速调查 [CORSAIR] 研究)。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12777-x.
6
Inequalities and mental health during the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK: a mixed-methods exploration.英国冠状病毒大流行期间的不平等和心理健康:混合方法探索。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1830. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16523-9.
7
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
8
Preventive behaviours and family inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in China.新冠疫情期间的预防行为与家庭不平等:一项中国的横断面研究
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 20;10(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00884-7.
9
Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults.新冠疫情期间的早期认知与行为反应:一项针对英国成年人的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):e043577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577.
10
Political stringency, infection rates, and higher education students' adherence to government measures in the Nordic countries and the UK during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情第一波期间北欧国家和英国的政治严厉程度、感染率与高等教育学生对政府措施的遵守情况
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107245. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107245. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the interplay between epidemiological and social cognitve drivers of behaviour change during the Covid-19 pandemic.了解新冠疫情期间行为改变的流行病学和社会认知驱动因素之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14644-2.
2
Impact of Dark Triad personality traits on COVID-19 vaccination uptake and prevention efforts: insights from the European Covid Survey (ECOS).黑暗三性格特质对新冠疫苗接种率及预防工作的影响:来自欧洲新冠调查(ECOS)的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22471-3.
3
Is the Unequal COVID-19 Burden in Canada Due to Unequal Levels of Citizen Discipline across Provinces?
加拿大新冠疫情负担不均是由于各省公民自律程度不同吗?
Can Public Policy. 2022 Mar 1;48(1):124-143. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2021-060.
4
Public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities.公众对英格兰 COVID-19 大流行的看法和反应:一项具有不同种族群体的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e061027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061027.