George Gavin, Nota Phiwe, Strauss Michael, Lansdell Emma, Peters Remco P H, Brysiewicz Petra, Nadesan-Reddy Nisha, Wassenaar Douglas
Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 20;3(11):e0002639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002639. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed examin the factors associated with the uptake and non-acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses among healthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa. We used a mixed-methods design with data from a web-based self-administered survey followed by semi-structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with selected participants. Of the 6235 HCWs included in our analysis who had fully vaccinated, 3470 (56%) had taken their booster dose with a further 17% intending to get the booster. HCWs aged 35 to 49 years (OR = 1.30 [95% CI: 1.15-1.46]), and those aged 50 years or older (OR = 2.66 [95% CI: 2.32-3.05]) were more likely to get the booster dose. Females were less likely to have received the booster dose (OR = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.79-0.98]) with doctors more likely (OR = 1.58 [95% CI: 1.35-1.84]) than Nurses to have received the booster dose. HCWs in direct contact with patients (OR = 1.17 [95% CI: 1.00-1.38]) and who had previously received a flu vaccine (OR = 1.99 [95% CI: 1.56-2.55]) were more likely to have received the booster dose. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data analysis: (1) Vaccination as routine practice among HCWs; (2) Emergence of new COVID-19 variants necessitating vaccine boosters; (3) Fear of potential side-effects; and (4) Limited value of COVID-19 vaccine boosters. Some HCWs broadly accepted the value of vaccination, and believed that boosters were necessary to effectively combat emergent new virus strains, which contrasted with peers who believed that boosters offered little defence against virus mutations. Fear prohibited some HCWs from getting the booster, with some having experienced adverse side effects from their initial vaccination, whilst others were concerned about future complications. Waning booster uptake rates could be arrested through invigorated communication strategies, while effective evidence-based training can potentially create positive normative vaccination practices amongst HCWs.
本研究旨在调查南非医护人员中与接受和不接受新冠疫苗加强针相关的因素。我们采用了混合方法设计,数据来自基于网络的自我管理调查,随后对选定参与者进行半结构化深入访谈(IDI)。在我们分析的6235名已完全接种疫苗的医护人员中,3470人(56%)接种了加强针,另有17%打算接种加强针。35至49岁的医护人员(OR = 1.30 [95% CI:1.15 - 1.46])以及50岁及以上的医护人员(OR = 2.66 [95% CI:2.32 - 3.05])更有可能接种加强针。女性接种加强针的可能性较小(OR = 0.88 [95% CI:0.79 - 0.98]),而医生比护士更有可能接种加强针(OR = 1.58 [95% CI:1.35 - 1.84])。与患者直接接触的医护人员(OR = 1.17 [95% CI:1.00 - 1.38])以及之前接种过流感疫苗的医护人员(OR = 1.99 [95% CI:1.56 - 2.55])更有可能接种加强针。定性数据分析得出了四个主题:(1)医护人员将接种疫苗作为常规做法;(2)新冠病毒新变种的出现使疫苗加强针成为必要;(3)对潜在副作用的恐惧;(4)新冠疫苗加强针的价值有限。一些医护人员广泛认可接种疫苗的价值,并认为加强针对于有效对抗新出现的病毒株是必要的,这与那些认为加强针在抵御病毒突变方面作用不大的同行形成了对比。恐惧使一些医护人员无法接种加强针,一些人在初次接种疫苗时经历了不良副作用,而另一些人则担心未来的并发症。通过加强沟通策略可以阻止加强针接种率的下降,而有效的循证培训可能会在医护人员中形成积极的规范接种行为。