• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随着乳腺 MRI 经验的增加,诊断准确性如何演变?

How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?

机构信息

Breast Imaging Division, Medical Imaging Department, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Tomography. 2023 Nov 6;9(6):2067-2078. doi: 10.3390/tomography9060162.

DOI:10.3390/tomography9060162
PMID:37987348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10661242/
Abstract

Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting suspicious MRI findings. From all high-risk screening breast MRIs conducted between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020, we reviewed all BI-RADS 4/5 observations with pathological tissue diagnoses. Overall and annual PPV3s were computed. Radiologists with fewer than ten observations were excluded from performance analyses. PPV3s were computed for each radiologist. We assessed how MRI experience, BPE, and FGT impacted diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analyses, defining positive cases as malignancies alone (definition A) or malignant or high-risk lesions (definition B). There were 536 BI-RADS 4/5 observations with tissue diagnoses, including 77 malignant and 51 high-risk lesions. A total of 516 observations were included in the radiologist performance analyses. The average radiologist's PPV3 was 16 ± 6% (definition A) and 25 ± 8% (definition B). MRI experience in years correlated significantly with positive cases (definition B, OR = 1.05, = 0.03), independent of BPE or FGT. Diagnostic accuracy improved exponentially with increased MRI experience (definition B, OR of 1.27 and 1.61 for 5 and 10 years, respectively, = 0.03 for both). Lower levels of BPE significantly correlated with increased odds of findings being malignant, independent of FGT and MRI experience. More extensive MRI reading experience improves radiologists' diagnostic accuracy for high-risk or malignant lesions, even in MRI studies with increased BPE.

摘要

我们机构是为高风险女性提供年度乳房 MRI 筛查的省级项目的一部分。我们评估了 MRI 经验、背景实质增强(BPE)和纤维腺体组织(FGT)的数量如何影响经活检证实的预测值(PPV3)和检测可疑 MRI 结果的准确性。从 2011 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间进行的所有高风险筛查乳房 MRI 中,我们回顾了所有 BI-RADS 4/5 观察结果和组织学诊断。计算了总体和年度 PPV3。将 MRI 经验少于 10 次的放射科医生排除在性能分析之外。为每位放射科医生计算了 PPV3。我们使用逻辑回归分析评估了 MRI 经验、BPE 和 FGT 如何影响诊断准确性,将阳性病例定义为仅恶性肿瘤(定义 A)或恶性或高危病变(定义 B)。共有 536 个 BI-RADS 4/5 观察结果和组织学诊断,包括 77 例恶性和 51 例高危病变。共有 516 个观察结果纳入放射科医生性能分析。平均放射科医生的 PPV3 为 16 ± 6%(定义 A)和 25 ± 8%(定义 B)。MRI 经验(以年为单位)与阳性病例显著相关(定义 B,OR = 1.05, = 0.03),与 BPE 或 FGT 无关。随着 MRI 经验的增加,诊断准确性呈指数级提高(定义 B,分别为 5 年和 10 年的 OR 为 1.27 和 1.61, = 0.03)。BPE 水平越低,与发现恶性的几率增加独立相关,与 FGT 和 MRI 经验无关。更广泛的 MRI 阅读经验可提高放射科医生对高危或恶性病变的诊断准确性,即使在 BPE 增加的 MRI 研究中也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ad/10661242/e9b4c253cb95/tomography-09-00162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ad/10661242/3037efb87fd8/tomography-09-00162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ad/10661242/e9b4c253cb95/tomography-09-00162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ad/10661242/3037efb87fd8/tomography-09-00162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ad/10661242/e9b4c253cb95/tomography-09-00162-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?随着乳腺 MRI 经验的增加,诊断准确性如何演变?
Tomography. 2023 Nov 6;9(6):2067-2078. doi: 10.3390/tomography9060162.
2
Amount of fibroglandular tissue FGT and background parenchymal enhancement BPE in relation to breast cancer risk and false positives in a breast MRI screening program : A retrospective cohort study.乳腺磁共振筛查项目中纤维-腺体组织(FGT)和背景实质强化(BPE)与乳腺癌风险和假阳性的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4678-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06020-2. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI in women with high genetic risk: Are changes before and after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy associated with breast cancer risk?背景实质强化和乳腺磁共振成像中高遗传风险女性的纤维腺体组织:降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术前后的变化是否与乳腺癌风险相关?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Dec;109:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
High-temporal resolution DCE-MRI improves assessment of intra- and peri-breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4.高时间分辨率 DCE-MRI 提高了 BI-RADS 4 类乳腺内及周围病变的评估能力。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01015-4.
5
MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Is Not Associated with Breast Cancer.MRI背景实质强化与乳腺癌无关。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 5;11(7):e0158573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158573. eCollection 2016.
6
Quantitative Assessment of Breast Parenchymal Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Correlation with Age, Background Parenchymal Enhancement, and Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MRI.18F-FDG PET/CT对乳腺实质摄取的定量评估:与年龄、背景实质强化及MRI上纤维腺体量的相关性
J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(10):1518-1522. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.174904. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy?乳腺MRI中的运动伪影、病变类型和实质强化:究竟是什么影响诊断准确性?
Acta Radiol. 2019 Jan;60(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/0284185118770918. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Association of Breast Cancer Odds with Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified Using a Fully Automated Method at MRI: The IMAGINE Study.基于 MRI 的全自动背景实质增强量化评估与乳腺癌患病风险的相关性:IMAGINE 研究。
Radiology. 2023 Sep;308(3):e230367. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230367.
9
Fully automatic quantification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement with accurate implementation for axial and sagittal breast MRI protocols.轴向和矢状位乳腺 MRI 方案中准确实施的纤维腺体组织和背景实质增强的全自动定量。
Med Phys. 2021 Jan;48(1):238-252. doi: 10.1002/mp.14581. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement.凯泽评分在诊断背景实质强化程度较高患者乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像中的定量评估
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):6384-6394. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-113. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
False-positive incidental lesions detected on contrast-enhanced breast MRI: clinical and imaging features.对比增强乳腺MRI检测到的假阳性偶然病变:临床及影像特征
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;198(2):321-334. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06861-y. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Factors Influencing Trainees' Interest in Breast Imaging.影响学员对乳腺成像兴趣的因素。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022 Aug;73(3):462-472. doi: 10.1177/08465371211049553. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Fibroglandular Tissue and Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Correlates With Breast Cancer.
乳腺磁共振成像中的纤维腺体组织及背景实质强化与乳腺癌相关。
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 30;11:616716. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616716. eCollection 2021.
4
High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations.乳腺高危病变:同步诊断工具及管理建议
Insights Imaging. 2021 May 26;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01005-6.
5
Breast cancer and background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.乳腺癌与乳腺磁共振成像背景实质强化:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00566-8.
6
Management of High-Risk Breast Lesions.高危乳腺病变的管理
Radiol Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;59(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.08.005.
7
Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.背景实质强化在乳腺 MRI 中的应用:全面综述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan;51(1):43-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26762. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Amount of fibroglandular tissue FGT and background parenchymal enhancement BPE in relation to breast cancer risk and false positives in a breast MRI screening program : A retrospective cohort study.乳腺磁共振筛查项目中纤维-腺体组织(FGT)和背景实质强化(BPE)与乳腺癌风险和假阳性的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4678-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06020-2. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Correlation Between Mammographic Breast Density, Breast Tissue Type in Ultrasonography, Fibroglandular Tissue, and Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.乳腺钼靶密度、超声检查中的乳腺组织类型、纤维腺组织与磁共振成像中乳腺实质背景强化之间的相关性
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2018 Apr 18;12:1178223418771971. doi: 10.1177/1178223418771971. eCollection 2018.
10
Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.并非所有的假阳性诊断都是等同的:关于在乳腺 MRI 与乳腺钼靶/数字断层合成筛查中做出的假阳性诊断的预后意义。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 9;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0937-7.