Mandroukas Athanasios, Metaxas Ioannis, Michailidis Yiannis, Metaxas Thomas
Laboratory of Evaluation of Human Biological Performance, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Nov 2;8(4):153. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8040153.
The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the passive joint range of motion (PROM) and muscle strength in prepubertal rhythmic gymnasts (RGs), artistic gymnasts (AGs), and a control group (CG) of the same age. A total of 54 prepubertal girls were divided into three groups: 18 RGs (age 11.14 ± 0.7, height 142.6 ± 5.81, and body mass 31.2 ± 3.63); 18 AGs (age 11.27 ± 0.99, height 139.6 ± 5.85, and body mass 31.7 ± 3.21), and 18 school girls who are defined as CG (age 10.55 ± 0.42, height 145.33 ± 6.95, and body mass 42.1 ± 8.21) participated in the study. All athletes were elites and participated in national competitions. The CG participated only in their school physical education program. Isokinetic peak torques were measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex II) at 60, 180, and 300°·sec. Body mass index was greater in the CG compared to RGs and AGs ( < 0.001). PROM in cervical extension in RG was significantly higher compared to the AG and CG ( < 0.001). The athlete groups, RG and AG, showed significantly greater PROM in knee flexion ( < 0.001), hip flexion ( < 0.001), and hip abduction ( < 0.05) compared to CG. PROM in hip flexion was different between the left and right leg in RGs. The relative muscle strength of the quadriceps in the RG and AG was significantly greater compared to CG ( < 0.001 and < 0.01 respectively). Gymnastics training in prepubertal ages can improve neuromuscular function and increase the relative muscle strength. Therefore, it is essential to note that when evaluating children within the developmental ages, especially those involved in sports, the type of muscle strength to be assessed should be specified.
本研究的目的是调查和比较青春期前艺术体操运动员(RGs)、竞技体操运动员(AGs)和同年龄对照组(CG)的被动关节活动范围(PROM)和肌肉力量。总共54名青春期前女孩被分为三组:18名艺术体操运动员(年龄11.14±0.7岁,身高142.6±5.81厘米,体重31.2±3.63千克);18名竞技体操运动员(年龄11.27±0.99岁,身高139.6±5.85厘米,体重31.7±3.21千克),以及18名被定义为对照组的在校女生(年龄10.55±0.42岁,身高145.33±6.95厘米,体重42.1±8.21千克)参与了该研究。所有运动员均为精英选手且参加过全国比赛。对照组仅参加学校体育课程。使用等速测力计(Cybex II)在60、180和300°·秒时测量等速峰值扭矩。与艺术体操运动员和竞技体操运动员相比,对照组的体重指数更高(<0.001)。与竞技体操运动员和对照组相比,艺术体操运动员颈椎后伸的被动关节活动范围显著更高(<0.001)。与对照组相比,艺术体操运动员组和竞技体操运动员组在膝关节屈曲(<0.001)、髋关节屈曲(<0.001)和髋关节外展(<0.05)方面的被动关节活动范围显著更大。艺术体操运动员左右腿的髋关节屈曲被动关节活动范围不同。与对照组相比,艺术体操运动员和竞技体操运动员股四头肌的相对肌肉力量显著更大(分别为<0.001和<0.01)。青春期前的体操训练可以改善神经肌肉功能并增加相对肌肉力量。因此,必须注意的是,在评估发育年龄段的儿童,尤其是参与体育运动的儿童时,应明确要评估的肌肉力量类型。