Chong Katherine, Basu Niladri
Center for Indigenous Peoples' Nutrition and Environment (CINE), Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1306-1329. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4869. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
Indigenous communities are disproportionately exposed to contaminated sites, and this poses unique challenges as many Indigenous peoples consider land as an integral part of their culture and economy. This scoping review aimed to identify and map information on contaminated sites and Indigenous peoples in Canada and the United States, namely (1) the relationship between contaminated sites and Indigenous peoples and their land and food systems; (2) strategies, challenges, and successes for contaminated sites assessment and management on Indigenous land; and (3) Indigenous leadership and inclusion in contaminated site assessment and management. We followed a PRISMA-ScR (Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist to collect data that could be categorized into these three objectives. Between October 2021 and July 2023, information from three data streams was retrieved: a systematic literature search; a grey literature search; and federal site data retrieval (Canada's Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory, USEPA's contaminated sites databases, including Superfund). This search yielded 51 peer-reviewed articles, 21 grey literature articles, and 11 404 federal site records, evidencing the contamination of the lands of 875 Indigenous communities and the presence of 440 different contaminants or contaminant groups. The body of information was categorized into three themes within the above objectives: Objective 1: Indigenous communities and geographic patterns; Contaminated sites, sources, and media; Contaminated sites and Indigenous lands; Contaminated sites and Indigenous food systems; Contaminated sites and the health of Indigenous peoples; Objective 2: Site management and classification processes; Health risk assessment; Risk management; Long-term management; and Objective 3: Collaborative research, Collaborative site management; Traditional knowledge and contaminated sites. Results highlighted a need to prioritize holism, efficiency, and Indigenous leadership in site assessment, management, and research, including a focus on community-specific approaches to site assessment and management; a reconceptualization of risks that privileges Indigenous epistemologies; and greater collaboration between stakeholder networks. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1306-1329. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
原住民社区过多地暴露于受污染场地,这带来了独特的挑战,因为许多原住民将土地视为其文化和经济的重要组成部分。本综述旨在识别和梳理加拿大和美国受污染场地及原住民的相关信息,具体包括:(1)受污染场地与原住民及其土地和食物系统之间的关系;(2)原住民土地上受污染场地评估和管理的策略、挑战及成效;(3)原住民在受污染场地评估和管理中的领导力及参与情况。我们遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统评价与Meta分析的透明报告——综述扩展版)清单收集可归类于这三个目标的数据。在2021年10月至2023年7月期间,我们检索了三个数据源的信息:系统文献检索、灰色文献检索以及联邦场地数据检索(加拿大联邦受污染场地清单、美国环境保护局的受污染场地数据库,包括超级基金场地)。此次检索共得到51篇同行评审文章、21篇灰色文献文章以及11404条联邦场地记录,证明了875个原住民社区的土地受到污染,以及存在440种不同的污染物或污染物类别。这些信息被归类为上述目标下的三个主题:目标1:原住民社区与地理模式;受污染场地、来源及介质;受污染场地与原住民土地;受污染场地与原住民食物系统;受污染场地与原住民健康;目标2:场地管理与分类流程;健康风险评估;风险管理;长期管理;以及目标3:合作研究、合作场地管理;传统知识与受污染场地。结果强调,在场地评估、管理和研究中,需要优先考虑整体性、效率和原住民领导力,包括关注针对特定社区的场地评估和管理方法;重新认识以原住民认识论为优先的风险;以及利益相关者网络之间加强合作。《综合环境评估与管理》2024年;20:1306 - 1329。© 2023作者。《综合环境评估与管理》由Wiley Periodicals LLC代表环境毒理学与化学学会(SETAC)出版。