• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用模拟来评估腹部触诊技能的困难。

Difficulties in using simulation to assess abdominal palpation skills.

机构信息

The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.

Guangdong Academy for Medical Simulation (GAMS), Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04861-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04861-6
PMID:37996904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668513/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal palpation is an essential examination to diagnose various digestive system diseases. This study aimed to develop an objective and standardized test based on abdominal palpation simulators, and establish a credible pass/fail standard of basic competency.

METHODS

Two tests were designed using the newly developed Jucheng abdominal palpation simulator (test 1) and the AbSim simulator (test 2), respectively. Validity evidence for both tests was gathered according to Messick's contemporary framework by using experts to define test content and then administering the tests in a highly standardized way to participants of different experience. Different simulator setups modified by the built-in software were selected from hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, positive McBurney's sign plus rebound tenderness, gallbladder tenderness (Murphy's sign), pancreas tenderness, and a normal setup without pathologies, with six sets used in test 1 and five sets used in test 2. Different novices and experienced were included in the tests, and test 1 was also administered to an intermediate group. Scores and test time were collected and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The internal consistency reliability of test 1 and test 2 showed low Cronbach's alphas of 0.35 and -0.41, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for palpation time across cases were 0.65 for test 1 and 0.76 for test 2. There was no statistical difference in total time spent and total scores among the three groups in test 1 (P-values (ANOVA) were 0.53 and 0.35 respectively), nor between novices and experienced groups in test 2 (P-values (t-test) were 0.13 and 1.0 respectively). It was not relevant to try to establish pass/fail standards due to the low reliability and lack of discriminatory ability of the tests.

CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to measure abdominal palpation skills in a valid way using either of the two standardized, simulation-based tests in our study. Assessment of the patient's abdomen using palpation is a challenging clinical skill that is difficult to simulate as it highly relies on tactile sensations and adequate responsiveness from the patients.

摘要

目的

腹部触诊是诊断各种消化系统疾病的基本检查方法。本研究旨在基于腹部触诊模拟器开发一种客观且标准化的测试,并建立一个可靠的通过/不通过的基本能力标准。

方法

使用新开发的聚成腹部触诊模拟器(测试 1)和 AbSim 模拟器(测试 2)分别设计了两项测试。根据 Messick 的当代框架,通过专家定义测试内容并以高度标准化的方式向具有不同经验的参与者进行测试,收集了这两项测试的有效性证据。从肝肿大、脾肿大、阳性 McBurney 征加反跳痛、胆囊触痛(Murphy 征)、胰腺触痛和正常无病变设置中,通过内置软件修改了不同的模拟器设置,测试 1 中使用了 6 个设置,测试 2 中使用了 5 个设置。在测试中纳入了不同的新手和有经验者,并且还对测试 1 进行了中级组的测试。收集和分析了分数和测试时间的统计数据。

结果

测试 1 和测试 2 的内部一致性可靠性显示,Cronbach 的阿尔法系数分别为 0.35 和-0.41,较低。测试 1 中针对病例的触诊时间的 Cronbach 的阿尔法系数为 0.65,测试 2 中为 0.76。在测试 1 中,三个组之间的总用时和总分数之间没有统计学差异(ANOVA 的 P 值分别为 0.53 和 0.35),测试 2 中新手和有经验者之间也没有统计学差异(t 检验的 P 值分别为 0.13 和 1.0)。由于测试的可靠性低且缺乏区分能力,因此尝试建立通过/不通过标准是不相关的。

结论

在我们的研究中,使用这两种标准化的基于模拟的测试中的任何一种都无法有效地测量腹部触诊技能。使用触诊评估患者的腹部是一项具有挑战性的临床技能,因为它高度依赖于触觉和患者的充分反应,因此很难模拟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/457d0741e60d/12909_2023_4861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/66701da98f14/12909_2023_4861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/9c4e0a7524a3/12909_2023_4861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/457d0741e60d/12909_2023_4861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/66701da98f14/12909_2023_4861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/9c4e0a7524a3/12909_2023_4861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a69/10668513/457d0741e60d/12909_2023_4861_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Difficulties in using simulation to assess abdominal palpation skills.使用模拟来评估腹部触诊技能的困难。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04861-6.
2
Development of a reliable simulation-based test for diagnostic abdominal ultrasound with a pass/fail standard usable for mastery learning.开发一种可靠的基于模拟的诊断性腹部超声测试,该测试具有可用于掌握学习的通过/失败标准。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4913-x. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
3
Ensuring competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a validity study of a newly developed assessment tool.确保超声引导程序的能力——一种新开发的评估工具的有效性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jul;32(7):4954-4966. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08542-8. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Simulation-based assessment of upper abdominal ultrasound skills.基于模拟的上腹部超声技能评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-05018-1.
5
Using a novel virtual-reality simulator to assess performance in lumbar puncture: a validation study.使用新型虚拟现实模拟器评估腰椎穿刺操作表现:一项验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 30;23(1):814. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04806-z.
6
Validating the virtual: a deep dive into ultrasound simulator metrics in otorhinolaryngology.验证虚拟世界:深入探讨耳鼻喉科超声模拟器的度量标准。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Apr;281(4):1905-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08421-y. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Competency assessment for the Versius surgical robot: a validity investigation study of a virtual reality simulator-based test.Versius 手术机器人的能力评估:基于虚拟现实模拟器测试的有效性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7464-7471. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10221-8. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Test in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.新型基于模拟的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术测试的验证。
J Endourol. 2021 Aug;35(8):1265-1272. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0986. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Using virtual reality simulation to assess competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.使用虚拟现实模拟评估电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术的操作能力。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2520-2528. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5254-6. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Surgeon-performed ultrasonography.外科医生实施的超声检查
Dan Med J. 2017 Nov;64(11).

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Scissor Glide Characteristics Through Surgeons' Subjective Assessment: The Application of Nitriding in Scissor Hardening Tests.通过外科医生的主观评估来评价剪刀的滑动特性:氮化处理在剪刀硬化测试中的应用。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 16;16(1):e52402. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52402. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
How does the modality of delivering force feedback influence the performance and learning of surgical suturing skills? We don't know, but we better find out! A review.力反馈传递方式如何影响手术缝合技能的表现和学习?我们不知道,但我们最好弄清楚!一篇综述。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2439-2452. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09740-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Simulation and virtual reality in intracranial aneurysms neurosurgical training: a systematic review.颅内动脉瘤神经外科手术训练中的模拟与虚拟现实:一项系统综述。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2022 Dec;66(6):494-500. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05526-6. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Effects of using an abdominal simulator to develop palpatory competencies in 3rd year medical students.
使用腹部模拟器对三年级医学生进行触诊技能培训的效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 26;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03126-y.
4
A Practical Review of Mastery Learning.掌握学习的实用复习
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Dec;86(10):ajpe8906. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8906. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Digitizing abdominal palpation with a pressure measurement and positioning device.使用压力测量与定位装置对腹部触诊进行数字化处理。
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 17;8:e10511. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10511. eCollection 2020.
6
Development of a Smartphone-Based Skin Simulation Model for Medical Education.基于智能手机的医学教育用皮肤模拟模型的开发。
Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):414-419. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000509.
7
Abdominal Physical Signs and Medical Eponyms: Part II. Physical Examination of Palpation, 1907-1926.腹部体征与医学术语:第二部分。触诊体格检查,1907 - 1926年。
Clin Med Res. 2019 Jun;17(1-2):47-54. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2018.1426.
8
Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Laparoscopic Colpotomy.腹腔镜阴道切开术模拟模型的开发与验证。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132 Suppl 1:19S-26S. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002857.
9
Abdominal Physical Signs and Medical Eponyms: Physical Examination of Palpation Part 1, 1876-1907.腹部体征与医学术语:触诊的体格检查第1部分,1876 - 1907年
Clin Med Res. 2018 Dec;16(3-4):83-91. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2018.1423. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
10
The apprenticeship model of clinical medical education: time for structural change.临床医学教育的学徒制模式:是时候进行结构性变革了。
N Z Med J. 2017 Sep 1;130(1461):66-72.