• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国马主关于马匹传染病生物安全措施的知识及使用情况的横断面调查

Cross-Sectional Survey of Horse Owners to Assess Their Knowledge and Use of Biosecurity Practices for Equine Infectious Diseases in the United States.

作者信息

White Nathaniel, Pelzel-McCluskey Angela

机构信息

Equine Disease Communication Center, 4033 Iron Works Pkwy, Lexington, KY 40511, USA.

United States Department of Agriculture Animal, Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg B, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;13(22):3550. doi: 10.3390/ani13223550.

DOI:10.3390/ani13223550
PMID:38003167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668770/
Abstract

Horses are transported in the United States more than any other livestock species and co-mingle at various events; therefore, they are considered to be at an increased risk for infectious disease transmission. The fragmented movement of horses combined with numerous sites of co-mingling makes tracing the potential spread of a disease outbreak a necessary part of an infection control plan, both locally and nationally. The cross-movement of personnel with horses and the persistence of endemic diseases make biosecurity implementation an ongoing challenge. Although many of the risks for infection are known, there is limited documentation about the usefulness of prospective control measures. The objective of this survey was to determine horse owners' understanding and knowledge of biosecurity practices for preventing infectious diseases in the United States. Questions covered owner demographic information, including horse use which was divided into 10 categories as follows: Pleasure/Trail Riding, Lessons/School, Western Show, English Show, Breeding, Farm/Ranch, Retired, Racing, Driving and Other. The survey was distributed by sending requests to a list of horse owner organizations, which then sent emails to their members. The email request described the survey and provided a website link to start the survey. A total of 2413 responses were collected. Analysis of the results included cross-tabulation to identify significant differences in biosecurity knowledge and awareness by horse use. Significant differences by horse use were identified for vaccination, biosecurity planning, use of isolation, disease risk, monitoring for diseases, co-mingling of horses, sanitation, medical decision making and health record requirements for horse events. In summary, the results suggest that most owners are not highly concerned about the risk of disease or the use of biosecurity. There are several biosecurity applications and techniques which can be increased and will benefit horse health and welfare. These include reliance on temperature monitoring, isolation of new horses at facilities, risks of horse mingling, entry requirements such as vaccination and health certificates at events, and an emphasis on having biosecurity plans for facilities and events where horses co-mingle. The information from this study will be used to create tools and information that horse owners and veterinarians can use to implement appropriate biosecurity practices for different types of horse uses and events.

摘要

在美国,马匹的运输比其他任何家畜种类都更为频繁,并且在各种活动中混在一起;因此,它们被认为感染疾病传播的风险更高。马匹的分散移动加上众多的混处地点,使得追踪疾病爆发的潜在传播成为地方和国家感染控制计划的必要组成部分。人与马的交叉移动以及地方病的持续存在使得生物安全措施的实施成为一项持续的挑战。虽然许多感染风险是已知的,但关于前瞻性控制措施有效性的文献却很有限。本次调查的目的是确定美国马匹所有者对预防传染病的生物安全措施的理解和认识。问题涵盖了所有者的人口统计信息,包括马匹用途,分为以下10类:休闲/小径骑行、课程/学校、西部马术表演、英式马术表演、繁殖、农场/牧场、退役、赛马、驾车和其他。通过向马匹所有者组织列表发送请求来分发调查问卷,这些组织随后向其成员发送电子邮件。电子邮件请求描述了调查内容并提供了开始调查的网站链接。共收集到2413份回复。结果分析包括交叉制表,以确定按马匹用途划分的生物安全知识和意识的显著差异。在疫苗接种、生物安全规划、隔离使用、疾病风险、疾病监测、马匹混处、卫生、医疗决策以及马匹活动的健康记录要求等方面,按马匹用途确定了显著差异。总之,结果表明大多数所有者对疾病风险或生物安全措施的使用并不高度关注。有几种生物安全应用和技术可以增加,这将有利于马匹的健康和福利。这些包括依靠温度监测、在设施中隔离新马、马匹混处的风险、活动中的疫苗接种和健康证明等入场要求,以及强调为马匹混处的设施和活动制定生物安全计划。这项研究的信息将用于创建工具和信息,供马匹所有者和兽医用于为不同类型的马匹用途和活动实施适当的生物安全措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/10fee9389881/animals-13-03550-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/71365dd6bde1/animals-13-03550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/d148fba8132e/animals-13-03550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/b2ca390096df/animals-13-03550-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/75a35340c2cc/animals-13-03550-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4ca82917d461/animals-13-03550-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4382fc32eb1d/animals-13-03550-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/786f3354ad2b/animals-13-03550-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4de982dbd673/animals-13-03550-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/10fee9389881/animals-13-03550-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/71365dd6bde1/animals-13-03550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/d148fba8132e/animals-13-03550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/b2ca390096df/animals-13-03550-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/75a35340c2cc/animals-13-03550-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4ca82917d461/animals-13-03550-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4382fc32eb1d/animals-13-03550-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/786f3354ad2b/animals-13-03550-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/4de982dbd673/animals-13-03550-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce94/10668770/10fee9389881/animals-13-03550-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-Sectional Survey of Horse Owners to Assess Their Knowledge and Use of Biosecurity Practices for Equine Infectious Diseases in the United States.美国马主关于马匹传染病生物安全措施的知识及使用情况的横断面调查
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;13(22):3550. doi: 10.3390/ani13223550.
2
Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia.马主在澳大利亚首次发生流感后的生物安全措施。
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Dec 15;102(4):304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
3
Horse owners'/managers' perceptions about effectiveness of biosecurity measures based on their experiences during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia.基于澳大利亚 2007 年流感大爆发期间的经验,马主/管理者对生物安全措施效果的看法。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Sep 15;106(2):97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Australian horse owners and their biosecurity practices in the context of Hendra virus.澳大利亚马主及其在亨德拉病毒背景下的生物安全措施
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Dec 1;148:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Biosecurity perceptions among Ontario horse owners during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间安大略省马匹所有者的生物安全认知
Equine Vet J. 2025 Mar;57(2):459-470. doi: 10.1111/evj.14115. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Applying Bayesian network modelling to understand the links between on-farm biosecurity practice during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak and horse managers' perceptions of a subsequent outbreak.应用贝叶斯网络建模来理解2007年马流感疫情期间农场生物安全措施与马匹管理者对后续疫情爆发的认知之间的联系。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Oct 1;116(3):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
7
Survey of state animal health officials reveals lack of personnel and resources to manage equine infectious disease outbreaks.对州动物卫生官员的调查显示,缺乏人员和资源来管理马传染性疾病的爆发。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2024 Jul 31;262(11):1504-1510. doi: 10.2460/javma.24.04.0248. Print 2024 Nov 1.
8
"We've learned to live with it"-A qualitative study of Australian horse owners' attitudes, perceptions and practices in response to Hendra virus.“我们已学会与之共存”——一项关于澳大利亚马主应对亨德拉病毒的态度、认知和行为的定性研究
Prev Vet Med. 2017 May 1;140:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
9
Preliminary insight into horse owners' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, exotic diseases in the United Kingdom.英国马主对异国疾病的认知和态度的初步洞察。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Oct 12;15(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2120-5.
10
'I want to be the sort of owner that he wants me to be': Rationales for biosecurity implementation among British horse owners.“我想成为他希望我成为的那种马主”:英国马主实施生物安全措施的理由
Equine Vet J. 2025 Jan;57(1):183-192. doi: 10.1111/evj.14047. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the Competition on miRNA, Proteins, and Metabolites in the Blood Exosomes of the Horse.竞争对马血液外泌体中微小RNA、蛋白质和代谢物的影响。
Genes (Basel). 2025 Feb 15;16(2):224. doi: 10.3390/genes16020224.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the Frequency of Detection of Common Respiratory Pathogens in Nasal Secretions and Environment of Healthy Sport Horses Attending a Multi-Week Show Event during the Summer Months.调查夏季多周展期间健康运动马鼻分泌物和环境中常见呼吸道病原体的检出频率。
Viruses. 2023 May 24;15(6):1225. doi: 10.3390/v15061225.
2
Prevalence of Latent Equid Herpesvirus Type 1 in Submandibular Lymph Nodes of Horses in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州马匹下颌下淋巴结中潜伏性1型马疱疹病毒的流行情况。
Pathogens. 2023 Jun 7;12(6):813. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12060813.
3
Equine Herpesvirus-1 Outbreak During a Show-Jumping Competition: A Clinical and Epidemiological Study.
马疱疹病毒-1 在一场场地障碍赛马比赛中的爆发:一项临床和流行病学研究。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2023 Sep;128:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104869. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
4
Multi-Centered Field Evaluation of a Salmonella spp. Point-of-Care PCR Assay Using Equine Feces and Environmental Samples.多中心现场评估使用马粪便和环境样本的即时 Salmonella spp. PCR 检测方法。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2023 Jul;126:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104538. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Willingness to adopt personal biosecurity strategies on thoroughbred breeding farms: Findings from a multi-site pilot study in Australia's Hunter Valley.纯种繁育农场采用个人生物安全策略的意愿:澳大利亚猎人谷多地点试点研究的结果
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 15;9:1017452. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1017452. eCollection 2022.
6
An epidemiological overview of the equine influenza epidemic in Great Britain during 2019.2019 年英国马流感疫情的流行病学概述。
Equine Vet J. 2023 Jan;55(1):153-164. doi: 10.1111/evj.13874. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
7
Investigation of the Use of Non-Invasive Samples for the Molecular Detection of EHV-1 in Horses with and without Clinical Infection.对有无临床感染的马匹使用非侵入性样本进行马疱疹病毒1型分子检测的研究。
Pathogens. 2022 May 13;11(5):574. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11050574.
8
Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus-1 infection in Europe.欧洲马疱疹病毒-1感染的临床影响、诊断与防控
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 6;20(4):e07230. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Equine Herpesvirus Type 4 (EHV-4) Outbreak in Germany: Virological, Serological, and Molecular Investigations.德国马疱疹病毒4型(EHV-4)疫情:病毒学、血清学及分子学调查
Pathogens. 2021 Jun 25;10(7):810. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070810.
10
Investigation of an EHV-1 Outbreak in the United States Caused by a New H Genotype.美国由一种新的H基因型引起的马疱疹病毒1型疫情调查。
Pathogens. 2021 Jun 13;10(6):747. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060747.