Suppr超能文献

视力损害与低视力辅助器具——儿童与成人的比较

Visual Impairment and Low Vision Aids-A Comparison between Children and Adults.

作者信息

Perrault Madeleine A, Lauer Gabriele, Voss Sabine, Seitz Berthold, Käsmann-Kellner Barbara

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):1608. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111608.

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aims to highlight differences in the etiology and fitting of low vision aids in visually impaired children and adolescents in comparison to adults. (2) Methods: A retrospective data collection from visually impaired patients presenting to obtain assistive devices from 1 January 2016 to 30 April 2020 was conducted. A total of 502 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were a minimum age of 4 years and the chart notation of a best-corrected distance visual acuity in the patient record prior to the fitting of magnifying visual aids. (3) Results: Of the 502 patients, 147 (29.3%) were children under the age of 18 years. The most common cause of visual impairment in children was albinism, and in adults, it was age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Children showed better distance visual acuity, with a median of 0.88 logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) compared to 1.0 in adults ( = 0.001). Near visual acuity was also significantly better, with a median of 0.54 logMAR in children compared to 0.9 in adults ( < 0.001). Near and distance visual acuity were significantly improved by fitting magnifying visual aids ( < 0.001). After fitting, near visual acuity averaged 0.3 logMAR, and distance visual acuity, 0.7. The most commonly prescribed aids were optical vision aids, which 68.5% of the patients received; 43.8% received electronic aids. In children, optical aids were more frequently prescribed, and in adults, electronic and acoustic aids ( < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Visually impaired patients can regain the ability to read and improve distance vision by using individually adapted and tested magnifying vision aids, often with optical aids alone. Differences between children and adults could be discovered in the etiology and severity of visual impairment, as well as in the provision type of low vision aids.

摘要

(1) 背景:本研究旨在突出与成年人相比,视力受损儿童和青少年在低视力辅助器具的病因及适配方面的差异。(2) 方法:对2016年1月1日至2020年4月30日前来获取辅助器具的视力受损患者进行回顾性数据收集。共纳入502例患者。纳入标准为年龄最小4岁,且在适配放大视觉辅助器具之前患者记录中有最佳矫正远视力的图表记录。(3) 结果:在502例患者中,147例(29.3%)为18岁以下儿童。儿童视力受损最常见的原因是白化病,而成年人则是年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)。儿童的远视力较好,中位数为0.88 logMAR(最小分辨角的对数),而成人为1.0(P = 0.001)。近视力也明显更好,儿童中位数为0.54 logMAR,而成人为0.9(P < 0.001)。适配放大视觉辅助器具后,近视力和远视力均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。适配后,近视力平均为0.3 logMAR,远视力为0.7。最常开具的辅助器具是光学视觉辅助器具,68.5%的患者接受了此类器具;43.8%的患者接受了电子辅助器具。在儿童中,光学辅助器具开具得更频繁,而在成年人中,电子和声学辅助器具开具得更频繁(P < 0.001)。(4) 结论:视力受损患者通过使用单独适配和测试的放大视觉辅助器具,通常仅使用光学辅助器具,就能恢复阅读能力并提高远视力。在视力受损的病因和严重程度以及低视力辅助器具的提供类型方面,可以发现儿童和成年人之间存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a06d/10672320/271ba9e670fa/jpm-13-01608-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验