Ibrahim Maria Salem, Alatiyyah Fatimah Mohammed, Mohammed Khawla Abbas, Alhawaj Hibah Nouh, Balhaddad Abdulrahman A, Ibrahim Ahmed Salem
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Oct 25;15(11):2527. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112527.
To assess and compare the effects of two pediatric anti-asthmatic medication doses on the microhardness of enamel and microhardness, surface roughness and color of restorative materials.
Human enamel samples and packable and flowable composite restorations were used. The samples were exposed to Salbutamol (0.6 mL/6 mL saline) and Budesonide (2 mL/2 mL saline) via a custom-made chamber connected to a nebulizer. Medication administration was conducted for 10 days. The samples were brushed with an electronic brush in a continuous and circular mode for 10 s after 10 min of medication administration. Assessments of microhardness, surface roughness and color were carried out at three different time intervals: baseline (T), 5 days (T) and 10 days (T). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), a two-sample t-test and a Bonferroni multiple comparison test were used to analyze the data and compare between the groups.
Both medications significantly ( < 0.05) decreased the microhardness of the enamel and composite samples after 10 days. Both medications lowered the surface roughness of both types of composite with a greater effect observed after 10 days of Budesonide administration ( < 0.05). Both medications had comparable detectable color change on both types of composite with a greater effect observed after 10 days of Budesonide administration ( < 0.05).
Salbutamol and Budesonide significantly decreased microhardness in the enamel samples. Both medications affected the properties of packable and flowable composites. The packable composite showed more resistance to microhardness changes. Both medications showed a clinically detectable change in the color of packable and flowable composites.
评估和比较两种儿科抗哮喘药物剂量对牙釉质显微硬度以及修复材料的显微硬度、表面粗糙度和颜色的影响。
使用人类牙釉质样本以及可塑形和可流动的复合修复材料。通过连接雾化器的定制腔室,将样本暴露于沙丁胺醇(0.6 mL/6 mL生理盐水)和布地奈德(2 mL/2 mL生理盐水)中。给药持续10天。给药10分钟后,用电子牙刷以连续圆周模式对样本刷牙10秒。在三个不同时间点进行显微硬度、表面粗糙度和颜色评估:基线(T0)、5天(T1)和10天(T2)。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、双样本t检验和Bonferroni多重比较检验来分析数据并比较各组。
10天后,两种药物均显著(P<0.05)降低了牙釉质和复合样本的显微硬度。两种药物均降低了两种类型复合材料的表面粗糙度,布地奈德给药10天后观察到的效果更明显(P<0.05)。两种药物对两种类型复合材料的可检测颜色变化相当,布地奈德给药10天后观察到的效果更明显(P<0.05)。
沙丁胺醇和布地奈德显著降低了牙釉质样本的显微硬度。两种药物均影响了可塑形和可流动复合材料的性能。可塑形复合材料对显微硬度变化的抵抗力更强。两种药物均在可塑形和可流动复合材料的颜色上显示出临床可检测的变化。