Lewis Myles J
Centre for Experimental Medicine & Rheumatology, EULAR Centre of Excellence, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Barts Health NHS Trust, Barts Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), London, United Kingdom; Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Feb;64S:152329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152329. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
Although targeted biological treatments have transformed the outlook for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 40% of patients show poor clinical response, and there is an imperative to unravel the molecular pathways and mechanisms underlying non-response and disease progression. 5-20% of RA individuals do not respond to all current medications including biologic and targeted therapies, which suggests that distinct pathogenic processes underlie multi-drug refractoriness.
In this brief review we discuss advances from recent studies in precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis.
Bulk RNA-Sequencing of synovial biopsies from RA individuals combined with histology and deep clinical phenotyping has revealed substantial insights into divergent pathogenic pathways which lead to disease progression and illuminated mechanisms underlying failure to response to specific treatments. Biopsy-driven randomised controlled trials, such as R4RA and the forthcoming STRAP trial, have enabled the development of machine learning predictive models for predicting response to different therapies.
In the Pathobiology of Early Arthritis Cohort (PEAC), gene expression analysis showed that individuals could be classified into three gene expression subgroups which correlated with histopathotypes defined by histological markers: pauci-immune fibroid pathotype characterised by fibroblasts and an absence of immune inflammatory cells; diffuse-myeloid pathotype characterised by macrophage influx; and the lympho-myeloid pathotype delineated by the presence of B cells, but typically containing a complex inflammatory infiltrate with ectopic lymphoid structure formation. In the R4RA biopsy-driven randomised controlled trial, patients were randomised to either rituximab or tocilizumab. Comprehensive analysis of synovial biopsies pre/post-treatment identified gene signatures of response associated with pathogenic pathways which could be tracked over time. A group of true refractory patients were identified who had failed anti-TNF prior to the study (it was an entry criterion) and then subsequently failed both trial biologics during the trial. RNA-Seq analysis and digital spatial profiling identified specific cell types including DKK3 fibroblasts as being associated with the refractory state. We identified machine learning predictive models based on specific gene signatures which were able to predict future response to therapy as well as the refractory state.
RNA-sequencing of synovial biopsies has enabled substantial progress in understanding disease endotypes in RA and identifying synovial gene signatures which predict prognosis and future response to treatment.
尽管靶向生物治疗已经改变了类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的前景,但40%的患者临床反应不佳,因此迫切需要阐明无反应和疾病进展背后的分子途径和机制。5%至20%的RA患者对包括生物制剂和靶向治疗在内的所有现有药物均无反应,这表明不同的致病过程是多药难治性的基础。
在这篇简短的综述中,我们讨论类风湿关节炎精准医学近期研究的进展。
对RA患者的滑膜活检进行批量RNA测序,并结合组织学和深入的临床表型分析,揭示了导致疾病进展的不同致病途径的大量见解,并阐明了对特定治疗无反应的潜在机制。活检驱动的随机对照试验,如R4RA和即将开展的STRAP试验,促成了用于预测对不同疗法反应的机器学习预测模型的开发。
在早期关节炎队列病理生物学(PEAC)研究中,基因表达分析表明,个体可分为三个基因表达亚组,这与由组织学标记定义的组织病理类型相关:以成纤维细胞为特征且无免疫炎症细胞的少免疫纤维样病理类型;以巨噬细胞浸润为特征的弥漫性髓样病理类型;以及以B细胞存在为特征,但通常含有形成异位淋巴结构的复杂炎症浸润的淋巴样髓样病理类型。在R4RA活检驱动的随机对照试验中,患者被随机分配接受利妥昔单抗或托珠单抗治疗。对治疗前后滑膜活检的综合分析确定了与致病途径相关的反应基因特征,这些特征可随时间追踪。确定了一组真正的难治性患者,他们在研究前(这是一项纳入标准)对抗TNF治疗无效,然后在试验期间对两种试验生物制剂均无效。RNA测序分析和数字空间分析确定了包括DKK3成纤维细胞在内的特定细胞类型与难治状态相关。我们基于特定基因特征确定了机器学习预测模型,这些模型能够预测未来对治疗的反应以及难治状态。
滑膜活检的RNA测序在理解RA疾病内型和确定预测预后及未来治疗反应的滑膜基因特征方面取得了重大进展。