Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Orthodontics, CES University, Medellin, Colombia.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):321-331. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12737. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
OBJECTIVE(S): This study aims to evaluate the influence of the piezocision surgery in the orthodontic biomechanics, as well as in the magnitude and direction of tooth movement in the mandibular arch using novel artificial intelligence (AI)-automated tools.
Nineteen patients, who had piezocision performed in the lower arch at the beginning of treatment with the goal of accelerating tooth movement, were compared to 19 patients who did not receive piezocision. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) were acquired before and after orthodontic treatment. AI-automated dental tools were used to segment and locate landmarks in dental crowns from IOS and root canals from CBCT scans to quantify 3D tooth movement. Differences in mesial-distal, buccolingual, intrusion and extrusion linear movements, as well as tooth long axis angulation and rotation were compared.
The treatment time for the control and experimental groups were 13.2 ± 5.06 and 13 ± 5.52 months respectively (P = .176). Overall, anterior and posterior tooth movement presented similar 3D linear and angular changes in the groups. The piezocision group demonstrated greater (P = .01) mesial long axis angulation of lower right first premolar (4.4 ± 6°) compared with control group (0.02 ± 4.9°), while the mesial rotation was significantly smaller (P = .008) in the experimental group (0.5 ± 7.8°) than in the control (8.5 ± 9.8°) considering the same tooth.
The open source-automated dental tools facilitated the clinicians' assessment of piezocision treatment outcomes. The piezocision surgery prior to the orthodontic treatment did not decrease the treatment time and did not influence in the orthodontic biomechanics, leading to similar tooth movements compared to conventional treatment.
本研究旨在使用新型人工智能(AI)自动化工具评估超声骨刀手术对正畸生物力学的影响,以及对下颌弓牙齿移动幅度和方向的影响。
19 名患者在治疗初期接受了下颌弓的超声骨刀手术,以加速牙齿移动,将其与 19 名未接受超声骨刀手术的患者进行比较。在正畸治疗前后采集锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口内扫描(IOS)。使用 AI 自动化牙科工具对 IOS 中的牙冠和 CBCT 扫描中的根管进行分割和定位,以量化 3D 牙齿移动。比较近远中、颊舌向、内收和外展线性运动以及牙齿长轴角度和旋转的差异。
对照组和实验组的治疗时间分别为 13.2±5.06 个月和 13±5.52 个月(P=0.176)。总体而言,两组的前牙和后牙的 3D 线性和角度移动均呈现相似的变化。与对照组(0.02±4.9°)相比,超声骨刀组的右下第一前磨牙近中长轴角度(4.4±6°)更大(P=0.01),而实验组(0.5±7.8°)的近中旋转明显小于对照组(8.5±9.8°)(P=0.008),考虑到同一颗牙齿。
开源自动化牙科工具有助于临床医生评估超声骨刀治疗效果。正畸治疗前的超声骨刀手术不会缩短治疗时间,也不会影响正畸生物力学,与常规治疗相比,牙齿移动相似。