• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性报告与临床医生讨论乳腺密度的社会人口学差异。

Sociodemographic Variations in Women's Reports of Discussions With Clinicians About Breast Density.

机构信息

Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44850.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44850
PMID:38010653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682834/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Breast density notifications advise women to discuss breast density with their clinicians, yet little is known about such discussions.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the content of women's reports of breast density discussions with clinicians and identify variations by women's sociodemographic characteristics (age, income, state legislation status, race and ethnicity, and literacy level).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This US nationwide, population-based, random-digit dial telephone survey study was conducted from July 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020, among 2306 women aged 40 to 76 years with no history of breast cancer who underwent mammography in the prior 2 years and had heard the term dense breasts or breast density. Results were analyzed from a subsample of 770 women reporting a conversation about breast density with their clinician after their last mammographic screening. Statistical analysis was conducted in April and July 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Survey questions inquired whether women's clinicians had asked about breast cancer risk or their worries or concerns about breast density, had discussed mammography results or other options for breast cancer screening or their future risk of breast cancer, as well as the extent to which the clinician answered questions about breast density.

RESULTS

Of the 770 women (358 [47%] aged 50-64 years; 47 Asian [6%], 125 Hispanic [16%], 204 non-Hispanic Black [27%], 317 non-Hispanic White [41%], and 77 other race and ethnicity [10%]) whose results were analyzed, most reported that their clinicians asked questions about breast cancer risk (88% [670 of 766]), discussed mammography results (94% [724 of 768]), and answered patient questions about breast density (81% [614 of 761]); fewer women reported that clinicians had asked about worries or concerns about breast density (69% [524 of 764]), future risk of breast cancer (64% [489 of 764]), or other options for breast cancer screening (61% [459 of 756]). Women's reports of conversations varied significantly by race and ethnicity; non-Hispanic Black women reported being asked questions about breast cancer risk more often than non-Hispanic White women (odds ratio [OR], 2.08 [95% CI, 1.05-4.10]; P = .04). Asian women less often reported being asked about their worries or concerns (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.86]; P = .02), and Hispanic and Asian women less often reported having their questions about breast density answered completely or mostly (Asian: OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.13-0.62]; P = .002; Hispanic: OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27-0.87]; P = .02). Women with low literacy were less likely than women with high literacy to report being asked about worries or concerns about breast density (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43-0.96]; P = .03), that mammography results were discussed with them (OR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.16-0.63]; P = .001), or that their questions about breast density were answered completely or mostly (OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.81]; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this survey study, although most women reported that their clinicians counselled them about breast density, the unaddressed worries or concerns and unanswered questions, especially among Hispanic and Asian women and those with low literacy, highlighted areas where discussions could be improved.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0992/10682834/8e28d5f25fd1/jamanetwopen-e2344850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0992/10682834/8e28d5f25fd1/jamanetwopen-e2344850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0992/10682834/8e28d5f25fd1/jamanetwopen-e2344850-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

乳腺密度通知建议女性与临床医生讨论乳腺密度,但对这种讨论知之甚少。

目的

研究女性报告的与临床医生讨论乳腺密度的内容,并确定女性社会人口统计学特征(年龄、收入、州立法状况、种族和族裔以及文化程度)的差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项美国全国性的、基于人群的、随机数字拨号电话调查研究,于 2019 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 4 月 30 日期间进行,对象为 2306 名年龄在 40 至 76 岁之间、无乳腺癌病史、过去两年内接受过乳房 X 光检查且听说过致密乳房或乳腺密度的女性。对 770 名在最近一次乳房 X 光筛查后与临床医生就乳腺密度进行过对话的女性进行了亚组分析。统计分析于 2023 年 4 月和 7 月进行。

主要结果和措施

调查问题询问女性的临床医生是否询问过乳腺癌风险或她们对乳腺密度的担忧或顾虑,是否讨论过乳房 X 光检查结果或其他乳腺癌筛查选择,以及临床医生回答有关乳腺密度问题的程度。

结果

在对 770 名(358 名[47%]年龄在 50-64 岁;47 名亚裔[6%],125 名西班牙裔[16%],204 名非西班牙裔黑人[27%],317 名非西班牙裔白人[41%],77 名其他种族和族裔[10%])结果进行分析的女性中,大多数报告说她们的临床医生询问了乳腺癌风险(88%[670 名/766 名]),讨论了乳房 X 光检查结果(94%[724 名/768 名]),并回答了患者有关乳腺密度的问题(81%[614 名/761 名]);较少的女性报告说,临床医生询问了她们对乳腺密度的担忧或顾虑(69%[524 名/764 名]),未来的乳腺癌风险(64%[489 名/764 名]),或其他乳腺癌筛查选择(61%[459 名/756 名])。女性报告的对话差异显著,按种族和族裔划分;非西班牙裔黑人女性报告临床医生询问乳腺癌风险的频率高于非西班牙裔白人女性(比值比[OR],2.08[95%CI,1.05-4.10];P=0.04)。亚裔女性较少报告被询问其担忧或顾虑(OR,0.42[95%CI,0.20-0.86];P=0.02),而西班牙裔和亚裔女性较少报告她们的问题得到了完全或大部分回答(亚裔:OR,0.28[95%CI,0.13-0.62];P=0.002;西班牙裔:OR,0.48[95%CI,0.27-0.87];P=0.02)。文化程度较低的女性比文化程度较高的女性更不可能报告被询问对乳腺密度的担忧或顾虑(OR,0.64[95%CI,0.43-0.96];P=0.03),报告与她们讨论了乳房 X 光检查结果(OR,0.32[95%CI,0.16-0.63];P=0.001),或报告她们的问题得到了完全或大部分回答(OR,0.51[95%CI,0.32-0.81];P=0.004)。

结论和相关性

在这项调查研究中,尽管大多数女性报告说她们的临床医生对她们进行了乳腺密度咨询,但未解决的担忧或顾虑以及未回答的问题,尤其是在西班牙裔和亚裔女性以及文化程度较低的女性中,突出了需要改进讨论的领域。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic Variations in Women's Reports of Discussions With Clinicians About Breast Density.女性报告与临床医生讨论乳腺密度的社会人口学差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44850.
2
Women's Reactions to Breast Density Information Vary by Sociodemographic Characteristics.女性对乳房密度信息的反应因社会人口特征而异。
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jul-Aug;33(4):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
Comparative Access to and Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening by Women's Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.不同种族/族裔和社会经济地位女性使用数字乳腺断层合成筛查的情况比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037546. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37546.
4
Dense Breast Notification Laws' Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.致密型乳腺通知法规与美国人群结局的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 May;18(5):685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
5
Perceived discrimination is associated with reduced breast and cervical cancer screening: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).感知歧视与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查率降低有关:妇女健康全国性研究(SWAN)。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Feb;23(2):138-45. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4328. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
6
Family History of Breast Cancer and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women.乳腺癌家族史与绝经前女性的乳腺 X 线摄影密度
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148983. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48983.
7
Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts.乳房致密女性乳腺癌筛查中补充性影像学检查的种族/民族差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(1):181-185. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05652-z. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risks Among Women Receiving Mammograph Screening.接受乳房 X 光筛查的女性对乳腺癌风险的认知。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252209. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52209.
9
Breast cancer screening practices among black, Hispanic, and white women: reassessing differences.黑人、西班牙裔和白人女性的乳腺癌筛查行为:重新评估差异
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5):327-37.
10
Impact of BMI on Prevalence of Dense Breasts by Race and Ethnicity.体质量指数(BMI)对不同种族和民族致密型乳腺患病率的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1524-1530. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0049.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Challenges and solutions in communication with patients with low health literacy: Perspectives of healthcare providers.与健康素养低的患者沟通中的挑战与解决方案:医疗服务提供者的观点
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0267782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267782. eCollection 2022.
3
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density.ACR 适宜性标准®基于乳腺密度的补充乳腺癌筛查。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S456-S473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.002.
4
General practitioners' (GPs) understanding and views on breast density in Australia: a qualitative interview study.澳大利亚全科医生对乳腺密度的理解和看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e047513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047513.
5
Dense Breast Notification Laws' Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.致密型乳腺通知法规与美国人群结局的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 May;18(5):685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
6
Differences in Breast Density Awareness, Knowledge, and Plans Based on State Legislation Status and Sociodemographic Characteristics.基于州立法状况和社会人口学特征的乳房密度知晓度、知识及计划的差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1923-1925. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05578-3. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Breast Density.医生对乳腺密度的知识、态度和实践。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1193-1199. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7429. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.一项在马萨诸塞州医疗服务提供系统医院中针对西班牙语使用者接受致密型乳腺组织通知的体验的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4709-y. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Between-Race Differences in Processes Predicting Physician Communication for African American and European American Recipients of Breast Density Notifications.种族间预测医生沟通的过程差异,对接受乳腺密度通知的非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):721-731. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay079.
10
Breast Cancer Screening in 2018: Time for Shared Decision Making.2018年乳腺癌筛查:是时候进行共同决策了。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1814-1815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3388.