• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与健康素养低的患者沟通中的挑战与解决方案:医疗服务提供者的观点

Challenges and solutions in communication with patients with low health literacy: Perspectives of healthcare providers.

作者信息

Murugesu Laxsini, Heijmans Monique, Rademakers Jany, Fransen Mirjam P

机构信息

Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0267782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267782. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267782
PMID:35507632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067671/
Abstract

Insights in the challenges that healthcare providers encounter in serving low health literate patients is lagging behind. This study explored challenges perceived by healthcare providers and provides strategies in communication with low health literate patients. Primary and secondary healthcare providers (N = 396) filled in an online survey. We assessed the frequency of challenges prior to, during and following a consultation, and which strategies were used and recommended. Survey outcomes were validated in in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (N = 7). Providers (76%) reported one or more challenges that were subscribed to patients' difficulties in comprehending or applying health-related information, in communicating with professionals, or in taking responsibility for their health. Providers (31%) perceived difficulties in recognizing low health literate patients, and 50% rarely used health literacy specific materials. Providers expressed needs for support to recognize and discuss low health literacy, to adapt communication and to assess patient's comprehension. Future research should focus on developing strategies for providers to ensure patients' understanding (e.g. applying teach-back method), to recognize low health literate patients, and to support patients' in taking responsibility for their health (e.g. motivational interviewing).

摘要

医疗服务提供者在为健康素养低的患者提供服务时所面临挑战的相关见解仍较为滞后。本研究探讨了医疗服务提供者所察觉到的挑战,并提供了与健康素养低的患者进行沟通的策略。初级和二级医疗服务提供者(N = 396)填写了一份在线调查问卷。我们评估了会诊前、会诊期间和会诊后各种挑战出现的频率,以及所使用和推荐的策略。通过对医疗服务提供者(N = 7)进行深入访谈,对调查结果进行了验证。76%的提供者报告了一项或多项挑战,这些挑战与患者在理解或应用健康相关信息、与专业人员沟通或对自身健康负责方面的困难有关。31%的提供者认为识别健康素养低的患者存在困难,50%的提供者很少使用针对健康素养的特定材料。提供者表示需要获得支持,以识别和讨论低健康素养问题、调整沟通方式并评估患者的理解情况。未来的研究应侧重于为提供者制定策略,以确保患者理解(例如应用反馈教学法)、识别健康素养低的患者,并支持患者对自身健康负责(例如动机性访谈)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c4/9067671/286307b9b9a1/pone.0267782.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c4/9067671/3938fa7cd076/pone.0267782.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c4/9067671/286307b9b9a1/pone.0267782.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c4/9067671/3938fa7cd076/pone.0267782.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c4/9067671/286307b9b9a1/pone.0267782.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges and solutions in communication with patients with low health literacy: Perspectives of healthcare providers.与健康素养低的患者沟通中的挑战与解决方案:医疗服务提供者的观点
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0267782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267782. eCollection 2022.
2
"The system has to be health literate, too" - perspectives among healthcare professionals on health literacy in transcultural treatment settings.“这个系统也必须具备健康素养”——跨文化治疗环境中医疗保健专业人员对健康素养的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 21;21(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06614-x.
3
Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers.在西方国家基于医院的姑息治疗中为健康素养有限的患者提供适当的信息和决策支持:针对医疗保健提供者可用的沟通策略和工具的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Apr 12;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0421-x.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
'A basic understanding'; evaluation of a blended training programme for healthcare providers in hospital-based palliative care to improve communication with patients with limited health literacy.“基本理解”:评估基于医院的姑息治疗中为医疗保健提供者提供的混合培训计划,以改善与健康素养有限的患者的沟通。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03685-0.
6
Systematic development of a training program for healthcare professionals to improve communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with low health literate patients.为医疗保健专业人员制定培训计划,以改善与低健康素养患者的乳腺癌遗传咨询沟通。
Fam Cancer. 2020 Oct;19(4):281-290. doi: 10.1007/s10689-020-00176-3.
7
Assessing Teach-Back Utilization in a Downtown Medical Center.评估市中心医疗中心的回授教学利用率。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jul;5(3):e226-e232. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210719-01. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
8
Instrumental and affective communication with patients with limited health literacy in the palliative phase of cancer or COPD.与癌症或 COPD 终末期患者进行有限健康素养的工具性和情感性沟通。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 7;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00658-2.
9
Improving professional health literacy in hospitals: study protocol of a participatory codesign and implementation study.提高医院专业健康素养:一项参与式设计和实施研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 16;11(8):e045835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045835.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials With a Trial-Specific Patient Decision Aid: Development and Usability Study.使用特定试验的患者决策辅助工具提高患者在2期临床试验中的参与度:开发与可用性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Sep 10;27:e71817. doi: 10.2196/71817.
2
Sociodemographic predictors of digital health adoption in patients with asthma and COPD.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者采用数字健康的社会人口学预测因素。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 28;7:1579983. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1579983. eCollection 2025.
3
Between host country and homeland: a grounded theory study on place of dying and death in migrant cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' perspectives of facilitators and barriers to patient-centred care: insights from qualitative patient interviews.患者对以患者为中心的医疗服务的促进因素和障碍的看法:来自患者定性访谈的见解
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e033449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033449.
2
General practitioners' predictions of their own patients' health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium.全科医生对其自身患者健康素养的预测:比利时的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029357.
3
Organizational Health Literacy: Quality Improvement Measures with Expert Consensus.
在侨居国与祖国之间:一项关于移民癌症患者死亡地点和死亡情况的扎根理论研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01821-3.
4
Exploring Health Literacy Among Parents of Children Who Attended the Pediatric Rehabilitation Clinics in Qatar: A Convergent Parallel Research Design.探索卡塔尔儿科康复诊所儿童家长的健康素养:一种收敛平行研究设计。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jul 23;11:23779608251362293. doi: 10.1177/23779608251362293. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Conceptual Framework of Health-Literate Nursing System: A Proceduralized Grounded Theory Approach.健康素养护理系统的概念框架:一种程序化的扎根理论方法。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 18;2025:1496009. doi: 10.1155/jonm/1496009. eCollection 2025.
6
Exploring Influencing Factors on Health Literacy Knowledge and Experience Among Healthcare Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.探索医疗服务提供者健康素养知识与经验的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jul 8;18:2297-2311. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S504064. eCollection 2025.
7
The impact of a mainstream genetic testing pathway and socioeconomic factors on the uptake of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients: results of the nationwide GENE-SMART study.主流基因检测途径和社会经济因素对乳腺癌患者接受种系基因检测的影响:全国性GENE-SMART研究结果
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 14;27(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02081-y.
8
Underserved Patient Populations With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Progress and Remaining Challenges.转移性乳腺癌患者的医疗服务不足群体:进展与尚存挑战综述
Breast J. 2025 Jun 30;2025:2461234. doi: 10.1155/tbj/2461234. eCollection 2025.
9
Facilitators and Barriers of the Use of Prognostic Models for Clinical Decision Making in Acute Neurologic Care: A Systematic Review.急性神经护理中使用预后模型进行临床决策的促进因素和障碍:一项系统综述
Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug;45(6):753-770. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251343027. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
10
Arabic version of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): translation and validation.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的阿拉伯语版本:翻译与验证
Saudi Pharm J. 2025 Jun 5;33(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00013-7.
组织健康素养:基于专家共识的质量改进措施
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Jul 1;3(2):e127-e146. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190503-01. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy.新技术,新差距:电子健康与数字健康素养的交集。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:280-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.066. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
Multiple health literacy dimensions are associated with physicians' efforts to achieve shared decision-making.多个健康素养维度与医生努力实现共同决策有关。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1949-1956. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) at the patient-clinician interface: a qualitative study of what patients and clinicians mean by their HLQ scores.患者-临床医生界面的健康素养问卷(HLQ):关于患者和临床医生对其HLQ评分含义的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2254-8.
7
What role does health literacy play in patients' involvement in medical decision-making?健康素养在患者参与医疗决策中扮演着什么角色?
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0173316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173316. eCollection 2017.
8
Access to primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: a realist review.农村地区社会经济弱势老年人获得初级保健服务的情况:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 17;6(5):e010652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010652.
9
Health literacy and the use of healthcare services in Belgium.比利时的健康素养与医疗服务利用情况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Oct;70(10):1032-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206910. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.