van Geen Camilla, Chen Yixin, Kazinka Rebecca, Vaidya Avinash R, Kable Joseph W, McGuire Joseph T
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 17:2023.11.16.567406. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.16.567406.
Deciding how long to keep waiting for uncertain future rewards is a complex problem. Previous research has shown that choosing to stop waiting results from an evaluative process that weighs the subjective value of the awaited reward against the opportunity cost of waiting. In functional neuroimaging data, activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) tracks the dynamics of this evaluation, while activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and anterior insula (AI) ramps up before a decision to quit is made. Here, we provide causal evidence of the necessity of these brain regions for successful performance in a willingness-to-wait task. 28 participants with frontal lobe lesions were tested on their ability to adaptively calibrate how long they waited for monetary rewards. We grouped the participants based on the location of their lesions, which were primarily in ventromedial, dorsomedial, or lateral parts of their prefrontal cortex (vmPFC, dmPFC, and lPFC, respectively), or in the anterior insula. We compared the performance of each subset of lesion participants to behavior in a control group without lesions (n=18). Finally, we fit a newly developed computational model to the data to glean a more mechanistic understanding of how lesions affect the cognitive processes underlying choice. We found that participants with lesions to the vmPFC waited less overall, while participants with lesions to the dmPFC and anterior insula were specifically impaired at calibrating their level of persistence to the environment. These behavioral effects were accounted for by systematic differences in parameter estimates from a computational model of task performance: while the vmPFC group showed reduced initial willingness to wait, lesions to the dmPFC/anterior insula were associated with slower learning from negative feedback. These findings corroborate the notion that failures of persistence can be driven by sophisticated cost-benefit analyses rather than lapses in self-control. They also support the functional specialization of different parts of the prefrontal cortex in service of voluntary persistence.
决定为了不确定的未来奖励等待多长时间是一个复杂的问题。先前的研究表明,选择停止等待是一个评估过程的结果,该过程会权衡等待奖励的主观价值与等待的机会成本。在功能性神经成像数据中,腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)的活动追踪了这一评估的动态过程,而背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)和前脑岛(AI)的激活则在做出放弃决定之前增强。在这里,我们提供了因果证据,证明这些脑区对于在等待意愿任务中成功表现是必要的。对28名额叶受损的参与者进行了测试,以考察他们自适应校准等待金钱奖励时长的能力。我们根据他们损伤的位置对参与者进行分组,这些损伤主要位于前额叶皮层的腹内侧、背内侧或外侧部分(分别为vmPFC、dmPFC和lPFC),或位于前脑岛。我们将每组损伤参与者的表现与无损伤对照组(n = 18)的行为进行了比较。最后,我们将一个新开发的计算模型应用于数据,以更深入地理解损伤如何影响选择背后的认知过程。我们发现,vmPFC受损的参与者总体等待时间较短,而dmPFC和前脑岛受损的参与者在根据环境校准其坚持程度方面存在特定缺陷。这些行为效应可以通过任务表现计算模型参数估计的系统差异来解释:虽然vmPFC组表现出较低的初始等待意愿,但dmPFC/前脑岛损伤与从负面反馈中学习较慢有关。这些发现证实了这样一种观点,即坚持失败可能是由复杂的成本效益分析驱动的,而不是自我控制的失误。它们还支持前额叶皮层不同部分在自愿坚持方面的功能特化。