Suppr超能文献

说同一种语言 - 范围综述,以确定与社会处方相关的术语。

Speaking the same language - a scoping review to identify the terminology associated with social prescribing.

机构信息

Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, UK.

Wales School for Social Prescribing Research (WSSPR), UK.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Nov 28;24:e67. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000567.

Abstract

AIM

To identify the social prescribing-related terminology within the peer-reviewed literature of the UK and the grey literature from Wales.

BACKGROUND

Social prescribing has seen a period of development that has been accompanied by a proliferation of related terminology and a lack of standardisation in the manner in which it is employed. This creates barriers to engagement and impairs communication, both between professionals and members of the public. The Wales School for Social Prescribing Research and Public Health Wales committed to the development of a glossary of terms for social prescribing, to facilitate the clarification and standardisation of the associated terminology. Here, we describe the first step in that process.

METHOD

A scoping review of the peer-reviewed UK literature and Welsh grey literature was conducted. The titles and abstracts of 46,242 documents and the full text of 738 documents were screened. Data were charted from 205 documents. Data capture included terminology, the location within the UK of the research or intervention described in the article, and the perspective from which the article was authored. A general inductive approach was used to categorise the terms by theme.

FINDINGS

This research serves to highlight the breadth and diversity of the terminology associated with social prescribing. Results demonstrate aspects of shared commonality and clear distinction between the terminology from the two literature sources. The greatest contributions of terms were from articles that examined research and/or interventions in England and that were authored from the perspective of health or health and social care. The research indicates that nation- and sector-specific terms may not be adequately represented in the literature at large. Looking forward, it will be important to ensure that social prescribing terminology within the UK literature is culturally relevant and accurately reflects the terminology used by the workforce who encounter and deliver social prescribing.

摘要

目的

确定英国同行评议文献和威尔士灰色文献中与社会处方相关的术语。

背景

社会处方经历了一段发展时期,随之而来的是相关术语的大量增加,以及在使用方式上缺乏标准化。这给专业人员和公众之间的参与和沟通都造成了障碍。威尔士社会处方研究学院和威尔士公共卫生署致力于开发社会处方术语词汇表,以促进相关术语的澄清和标准化。在此,我们描述了该过程的第一步。

方法

对英国同行评议文献和威尔士灰色文献进行了范围综述。筛选了 46242 篇文献的标题和摘要以及 738 篇文献的全文。从 205 篇文献中提取数据。数据采集包括术语、文章中描述的研究或干预措施在英国的位置,以及文章作者的视角。采用一般归纳方法按主题对术语进行分类。

结果

本研究旨在强调与社会处方相关的术语的广度和多样性。结果表明,两种文献来源的术语具有共同的特点,也有明显的区别。术语的最大贡献来自于研究和/或干预措施在英格兰的文章,以及来自卫生或卫生和社会保健角度的文章。研究表明,在整个文献中,可能没有充分代表特定国家和部门的术语。展望未来,重要的是要确保英国文献中的社会处方术语具有文化相关性,并准确反映接触和提供社会处方的工作人员使用的术语。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/10689092/7342e49d5c00/S1463423623000567_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验