Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Interprof Care. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):377-387. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2285030. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
The healthcare industry is inadvertently a teamwork industry - and yet - little time is devoted to improving teamwork on the field. As a response to this issue, team development intervention (TDI) tools have flourished. Findings suggest the capability for TDIs to better team competencies, and potentially mitigate prominent healthcare problems. However, team coaching has been excluded as a potential TDI for healthcare. For this reason, we seek to 1) discuss existing team coaching models, integrating findings across the literature, 2) highlight the advantages of Hackman and Wageman (2005)'s model over others, 3) display its empirically-corroborated propositions, and finally, 4) provide general guidance on how to move forward. We move beyond extant literature by providing an outline on what outcomes team coaching can and cannot yield, accumulating evidence from fields outside of healthcare and incorporating team coaching into the TDI literature. By doing so, we hope empirical research on team coaching is incentivized, resulting in an efficient and accessible TDI for healthcare professionals and the field of interprofessional care.
医疗保健行业是一个不经意间的团队合作行业——然而——很少有时间用于改善现场的团队合作。作为对这一问题的回应，团队发展干预（TDI）工具应运而生。研究结果表明，TDI 有能力提高团队的能力，并有可能缓解突出的医疗保健问题。然而，团队辅导已被排除在医疗保健的潜在 TDI 之外。基于此，我们寻求 1）讨论现有的团队辅导模型，整合文献中的研究结果，2）强调 Hackman 和 Wageman（2005）模型相对于其他模型的优势，3）展示其经验证的命题，最后，4）提供关于如何推进的一般指导。我们通过提供团队辅导可以产生和不能产生的结果的大纲，从医疗保健领域之外的领域积累证据，并将团队辅导纳入 TDI 文献，超越了现有文献。通过这样做，我们希望激励对团队辅导的实证研究，为医疗保健专业人员和跨专业护理领域提供一种高效、便捷的 TDI。
