Schmidtke Oliver
Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, Canada.
Soc Leg Stud. 2023 Dec;32(6):911-929. doi: 10.1177/09646639231153124. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
This article analyses how right-wing populist actors claim to represent the "voice of the people" and express "popular sovereignty" as a mode of challenging the traditional constitutional foundation of liberal democracy. This hypothesis is illustrated by an investigation into the political discourse of the considering how this populist actor has developed a political strategy claiming to speak for the "people" in an authentic and immediate fashion. The analysis of this actor's political mobilization shows how the championed direct democratic representation is couched in a sovereigntist discourse that relies on divisive identity markers rather than genuine democratic participation. Drawing on Carl Schmitt's concept of the political, the article interprets right-wing populism as invoking a permanent "state of exception" that employs an emotionally charged - distinction whose logic of representing the people has the potential of triggering radical political change as well as undermining the integrity of rule-based democracy.
本文分析了右翼民粹主义行为者如何声称代表“人民的声音”,并将“人民主权”作为一种挑战自由民主传统宪法基础的方式加以表达。这一假设通过对[具体人物或群体]政治话语的调查得以阐明,其中考虑了该民粹主义行为者如何制定一种政治策略,宣称以真实和直接的方式为“人民”发声。对该行为者政治动员的分析表明,其所倡导的直接民主代表制是建立在一种主权主义话语之上的,这种话语依赖于分裂性的身份标识,而非真正的民主参与。借鉴卡尔·施密特的政治概念,本文将右翼民粹主义解释为援引一种永久的“例外状态”,这种状态采用了一种充满情感的区分方式,其代表人民的逻辑有可能引发激进的政治变革,并破坏基于规则的民主的完整性。