Milidrag Ardea, Safiye Teodora, Gutić Medo, Zlatanović Milena, Stevanović Aleksandar, Dubljanin Jakša, Despotović Mile, Miličić Vesna, Radević Svetlana, Ravić-Nikolić Ana
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Public Health Institution Health Center "Dr Branko Zogovic", Plav, Montenegro.
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Sep;52(9):1925-1934. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13574.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify the quality of life (QoL) of patients with psoriasis, to determine the possible differences depending on the therapeutic modalities (biologic, conventional treatment and phototherapy), and to examine other variables that could affect the success of the treatment. METHODS: This research was a non-experimental, quantitative, observational study that included 183 psoriasis patients. The study was conducted from November 2021 to December 2022 at the University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Serbia. The following instruments were used: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), as well as a general questionnaire that contained a set of questions which referred to sociodemographic data. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the average values of the DLQI score concerning the application of different therapeutic modalities (<0.001). Biologic treatment was the modality with the lowest impairments in the QoL domain (average value of DLQI score 10.6±7.3), followed by patients on conventional treatment (average value of DLQI score 12.9±7.9), and the highest levels of impaired QoL were in patients who received phototherapy (average value of the DLQI score 13.7±9.3). CONCLUSION: Patients on biological therapy at all four time points individually (baseline, 4, 12 and 16 weeks) had the lowest average values of the DLQI score, i.e. the best QoL compared to subjects who received other therapy.
背景:我们旨在确定银屑病患者的生活质量(QoL),确定不同治疗方式(生物制剂、传统治疗和光疗)可能存在的差异,并研究其他可能影响治疗效果的变量。 方法:本研究为非实验性、定量观察性研究,纳入了183例银屑病患者。该研究于2021年11月至2022年12月在塞尔维亚克拉古耶瓦茨大学临床中心进行。使用了以下工具:皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)、银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI),以及一份包含一系列涉及社会人口统计学数据问题的一般问卷。 结果:不同治疗方式应用的DLQI评分平均值存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。生物治疗是生活质量领域受损程度最低的治疗方式(DLQI评分平均值为10.6±7.3),其次是接受传统治疗的患者(DLQI评分平均值为12.9±7.9),生活质量受损程度最高的是接受光疗的患者(DLQI评分平均值为13.7±9.3)。 结论:在所有四个时间点(基线、4周、12周和16周)接受生物治疗的患者,其DLQI评分平均值最低,即与接受其他治疗的患者相比,生活质量最佳。
Iran J Public Health. 2023-9
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017-12
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017-9
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022-2
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-9-14
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022-5-2
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-3-19
Lancet. 2021-4-3
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-3-31