Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间,检查机制对传染病防控的有效性:一项自我对照的真实世界研究。

Effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency infection prevention and control in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic period: a self-control real-word study.

机构信息

Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, school of medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, P. R. China.

Development Department, Chengdu Yiou Technology Co. LTD, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, P. R. China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08682-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To ensure emergency infection prevention and control (IPC) can be fully supervised and monitored in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic period, a three-level inspector mechanism called "Internal self-check, Departmental cross-check, and Verification of outstanding key and difficult issues" was established in southwest China. The present study aimed to explore the effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC.

METHODS

A self-control real-world study was conducted during COVID-19 epidemic period from 2020 to 2022. An innovative designed mobile phone application was used to realize paperless information transmission and data management. Data were compared between inspection levels using SPSS 19.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 2,800,132 supervision records were collected, including 149,137 comprehensive epidemic IPC projects, 1,410,093 personal protective equipment (PPE) use, 1,223,595 wearing and removing process of PPE and 17,307 ultraviolet light-detectable fluorescent (UV/F) surface marker. During the study period, the inspectors and subjects explored many optimized IPC measures. The compliance rate of check items has exceeded 98%, and internal self-check has a statistically significant higher rate than departmental cross-check (99.95% versus 98.74%, χ = 26111.479, P < 0.001). Compare with the failure rate in internal self check, the failure rate of PPE usage and wearing/removing process was statistically higher in departmental cross-check (χ = 1957.987, P < 0.001, χ = 465.610, P < 0.001, respectively). The overall clearance rate of UV/F surface markers is 87.88%, but there is no statistically significant difference over the three years of the present study (F = 2.902, P = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC completed an incredible inspection workload and offered creative assistance to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. These methods and accumulated experiences should be helpful for us to strengthen IPC for future epidemic.

摘要

背景

为确保在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)流行期间能够全面监督和监测紧急感染预防和控制(IPC),中国西南部建立了三级检查机制,称为“内部自查、部门互查和对关键和难点问题的验证”。本研究旨在探讨该紧急 IPC 检查机制的有效性。

方法

本研究为 2020 年至 2022 年 COVID-19 流行期间的一项自我对照真实世界研究。使用创新设计的移动电话应用程序实现无纸化信息传输和数据管理。使用 SPSS 19.0 软件比较检查级别之间的数据。

结果

共收集了 2800132 份监督记录,包括 149137 项综合疫情 IPC 项目、1410093 项个人防护设备(PPE)使用情况、1223595 项 PPE 穿戴和脱卸过程以及 17307 项紫外线可检测荧光(UV/F)表面标记。在研究期间,检查人员和对象探索了许多优化的 IPC 措施。检查项目的合规率已超过 98%,内部自查的比率明显高于部门互查(99.95%比 98.74%,χ=26111.479,P<0.001)。与内部自查的失败率相比,部门互查的 PPE 使用和穿戴/脱卸过程的失败率统计学上更高(χ=1957.987,P<0.001,χ=465.610,P<0.001)。UV/F 表面标记的总体清除率为 87.88%,但在本研究的三年中没有统计学差异(F=2.902,P=0.071)。

结论

紧急 IPC 检查机制完成了令人难以置信的检查工作量,为抗击 COVID-19 疫情提供了创造性的帮助。这些方法和积累的经验应该有助于我们加强未来疫情的 IPC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce16/10702026/7f5655b4f389/12879_2023_8682_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验