Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2024 Jan;197:113466. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113466. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
INTRODUCTION: Accurate clinical staging of rectal cancer is hampered by suboptimal sensitivity of MRI in the detection of regional lymph node metastases. Consequently, some patients may be understaged and have been withheld neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in retrospect. Although Dutch guidelines do not advocate adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in rectal cancer, some of these clinically understaged patients receive ACT according to local policy. We aim to assess the benefit of ACT in these patients. METHODS: Population-based data from patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) but pathologically node-positive (pN+) rectal cancer that underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) without neoadjuvant treatment between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Stabilised inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was compared in ACT and non-ACT patients. RESULTS: Of 34,724 patients, 13,861 had cN0 disease of whom 3016 were pN+ (21.8%). 1466 (48.6%) of these patients underwent upfront TME and were included. Median follow-up was 84 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-97) versus 79 months (95% CI 77-81) in patients that did (n = 290, 19.8%) and did not (n = 1176, 80.2%) receive ACT, respectively. After sIPTW adjustment, ACT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.49-0.99; p = 0.04). The estimated 5-year OS rate was 74.2% versus 65.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort of patients with cN0 but pN+ rectal cancer who underwent upfront TME, ACT was associated with a significant OS benefit. These data support to discuss ACT in this population.
介绍:由于 MRI 在检测局部淋巴结转移方面的敏感性不足,直肠 癌的准确临床分期受到阻碍。因此,一些患者可能被低估分期,并且回顾性地被排除在新辅助(化疗)放疗之外。尽管荷兰指南不主张在直肠 癌中使用辅助化疗(ACT),但根据当地政策,其中一些临床低估分期的患者会接受 ACT。我们旨在评估这些患者接受 ACT 的获益。
方法:从荷兰癌症登记处获得了 2008 年至 2018 年间接受全直肠系膜切除术(TME)且未经新辅助治疗的临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)但病理淋巴结阳性(pN+)直肠 癌患者的基于人群的数据。通过多次插补处理缺失数据。使用稳定逆概率治疗加权(sIPTW)来平衡临床特征。比较 ACT 和非 ACT 患者的总生存(OS)。
结果:在 34724 名患者中,有 13861 名患者患有 cN0 疾病,其中 3016 名患者为 pN+(21.8%)。其中 1466 名患者(48.6%)接受了 upfront TME 并被纳入研究。中位随访时间为 84 个月(95%置信区间 [CI] 76-97),与未接受 ACT(n=290,19.8%)和接受 ACT(n=1176,80.2%)的患者相比,分别为 79 个月(95% CI 77-81)。经过 sIPTW 调整后,ACT 与 OS 改善相关(风险比 0.70;95% CI 0.49-0.99;p=0.04)。估计的 5 年 OS 率分别为 74.2%和 65.3%。
结论:在接受 upfront TME 的 cN0 但 pN+直肠 癌患者的这一基于人群的队列中,ACT 与显著的 OS 获益相关。这些数据支持在该人群中讨论 ACT。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020-6-7
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024-12-20