• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性非结石性与结石性胆囊炎胆囊穿孔:10 年单中心回顾性对比队列研究。

Gallbladder perforation in acute acalculous vs. calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative cohort study with 10-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine.

Department of Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Mar 1;110(3):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000994.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000994
PMID:38079596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10942242/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallstones are a well-known risk factor for acute cholecystitis. However, their role as a risk factor for gallbladder perforation (GBP) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of gallstones on the development of GBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This large-scale retrospective cohort study enroled consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary endpoint was the role of gallstones as a risk factor for developing GBP. Secondary endpoints included the clinical characteristics of GBP, other risk factors for GBP, differences in clinical outcomes between patients with acalculous cholecystitis (AC) and calculous cholecystitis (CC), and the influence of cholecystectomy timing.

RESULTS

A total of 4497 patients were included in this study. The incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the AC group compared to the CC group (5.6% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). However, there were no differences in ICU admission and hospital stay durations. The incidence of overall complications was significantly higher in the AC group than in the CC group (2.2% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). Patients with AC had a higher risk of developing GBP than those with CC (odds ratio, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.94-8.33). In addition, older age (≥60 years), male sex, comorbidities, poor performance status, and concomitant acute cholangitis were associated with the development of GBP. Furthermore, the incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the delayed cholecystectomy group than in the early cholecystectomy group (2.0% vs. 0.9%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AC is a significant risk factor for GBP. Furthermore, early cholecystectomy can significantly reduce GBP-related morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

胆结石是急性胆囊炎的一个已知危险因素。然而,其作为胆囊穿孔(GBP)危险因素的作用仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定胆结石对 GBP 发展的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项大规模的回顾性队列研究,纳入了因急性胆囊炎而行胆囊切除术的连续患者。主要终点是胆结石作为发生 GBP 的危险因素的作用。次要终点包括 GBP 的临床特征、GBP 的其他危险因素、非结石性胆囊炎(AC)和结石性胆囊炎(CC)患者之间临床结局的差异,以及胆囊切除术时机的影响。

结果

本研究共纳入 4497 例患者。AC 组 GBP 的发生率明显高于 CC 组(5.6%比 1.0%,P<0.001)。但 ICU 入院率和住院时间无差异。AC 组总并发症发生率明显高于 CC 组(2.2%比 1.0%,P<0.001)。AC 患者发生 GBP 的风险高于 CC 患者(优势比,5.00;95%CI,2.94-8.33)。此外,年龄≥60 岁、男性、合并症、较差的表现状态和伴发急性胆管炎与 GBP 的发生相关。此外,延迟胆囊切除术组 GBP 的发生率明显高于早期胆囊切除术组(2.0%比 0.9%,P<0.001)。

结论

AC 是 GBP 的一个显著危险因素。此外,早期胆囊切除术可显著降低 GBP 相关发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/12d83eaa27b6/js9-110-1383-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/5c4e05fc727e/js9-110-1383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/f0dfe9bb3ec7/js9-110-1383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/cf3e51f31b0f/js9-110-1383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/12d83eaa27b6/js9-110-1383-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/5c4e05fc727e/js9-110-1383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/f0dfe9bb3ec7/js9-110-1383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/cf3e51f31b0f/js9-110-1383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/12d83eaa27b6/js9-110-1383-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Gallbladder perforation in acute acalculous vs. calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative cohort study with 10-year single-center experience.急性非结石性与结石性胆囊炎胆囊穿孔:10 年单中心回顾性对比队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Mar 1;110(3):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000994.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Primary admission to a surgical service facilitates early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis but does not influence patient outcome.初次入住外科病房有助于急性胆囊炎患者早期行胆囊切除术,但不影响患者预后。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 5;408(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02957-7.
4
Biliary Disease in Immunocompromised Patients: a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.免疫功能低下患者的胆道疾病:一项单中心回顾性分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Aug;23(8):1589-1592. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04077-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Gallbladder perforation: A single-center experience in north India and a step-up approach for management.胆囊穿孔:印度北部的单中心经验和逐步治疗方法。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2022 Apr;21(2):168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A retrospective cohort study of 52 consecutive patients.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:52 例连续患者的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 May;17:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
7
Predictive factors for developing acute cholangitis and/or cholecystitis in patients undergoing delayed cholecystectomy: A retrospective study.预测行延期胆囊切除术患者发生急性胆管炎和/或胆囊炎的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Dysfunction and Polyps: Incidence and Follow up.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊功能障碍和息肉:发生率和随访。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00009.
9
Clinical characteristics of patients with newly developed acute cholecystitis after admission to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房后新发急性胆囊炎患者的临床特征。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 May;32(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis revisited.急性非结石性胆囊炎的急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术再探讨。
Surg Today. 2016 Mar;46(3):309-12. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1173-8. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden and risk factors for gallbladder and biliary tract diseases in China from 1990 to 2021 and burden predictions of risk factors for the next 15 years.1990年至2021年中国胆囊及胆道疾病的负担和危险因素以及未来15年危险因素的负担预测。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 15;12:1528608. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1528608. eCollection 2025.
2
Improved detection of gallbladder perforation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: two case reports.超声造影改善胆囊穿孔的检测:两例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 5;11:1422708. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1422708. eCollection 2024.
3
The imperative of cholecystitis: understanding and prioritizing gallbladder perforation.
胆囊炎的必要性:理解并优先处理胆囊穿孔
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5145-5146. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001462.