Suppr超能文献

急性非结石性与结石性胆囊炎胆囊穿孔:10 年单中心回顾性对比队列研究。

Gallbladder perforation in acute acalculous vs. calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative cohort study with 10-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine.

Department of Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Mar 1;110(3):1383-1391. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000994.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gallstones are a well-known risk factor for acute cholecystitis. However, their role as a risk factor for gallbladder perforation (GBP) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of gallstones on the development of GBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This large-scale retrospective cohort study enroled consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary endpoint was the role of gallstones as a risk factor for developing GBP. Secondary endpoints included the clinical characteristics of GBP, other risk factors for GBP, differences in clinical outcomes between patients with acalculous cholecystitis (AC) and calculous cholecystitis (CC), and the influence of cholecystectomy timing.

RESULTS

A total of 4497 patients were included in this study. The incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the AC group compared to the CC group (5.6% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). However, there were no differences in ICU admission and hospital stay durations. The incidence of overall complications was significantly higher in the AC group than in the CC group (2.2% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). Patients with AC had a higher risk of developing GBP than those with CC (odds ratio, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.94-8.33). In addition, older age (≥60 years), male sex, comorbidities, poor performance status, and concomitant acute cholangitis were associated with the development of GBP. Furthermore, the incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the delayed cholecystectomy group than in the early cholecystectomy group (2.0% vs. 0.9%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AC is a significant risk factor for GBP. Furthermore, early cholecystectomy can significantly reduce GBP-related morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

胆结石是急性胆囊炎的一个已知危险因素。然而,其作为胆囊穿孔(GBP)危险因素的作用仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定胆结石对 GBP 发展的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项大规模的回顾性队列研究,纳入了因急性胆囊炎而行胆囊切除术的连续患者。主要终点是胆结石作为发生 GBP 的危险因素的作用。次要终点包括 GBP 的临床特征、GBP 的其他危险因素、非结石性胆囊炎(AC)和结石性胆囊炎(CC)患者之间临床结局的差异,以及胆囊切除术时机的影响。

结果

本研究共纳入 4497 例患者。AC 组 GBP 的发生率明显高于 CC 组(5.6%比 1.0%,P<0.001)。但 ICU 入院率和住院时间无差异。AC 组总并发症发生率明显高于 CC 组(2.2%比 1.0%,P<0.001)。AC 患者发生 GBP 的风险高于 CC 患者(优势比,5.00;95%CI,2.94-8.33)。此外,年龄≥60 岁、男性、合并症、较差的表现状态和伴发急性胆管炎与 GBP 的发生相关。此外,延迟胆囊切除术组 GBP 的发生率明显高于早期胆囊切除术组(2.0%比 0.9%,P<0.001)。

结论

AC 是 GBP 的一个显著危险因素。此外,早期胆囊切除术可显著降低 GBP 相关发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5a/10942242/5c4e05fc727e/js9-110-1383-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验