• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥地利既往心脏康复患者对数字技术在日常生活、体育活动及健康信息方面的使用情况与认知:一项横断面调查

Use and perceptions of digital technology for daily life, physical activity and health information among former cardiac rehabilitation patients in Austria: A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

McGowan Hannah, Gutenberg Johanna, Leitner Veronika, Mühlhauser Kathrin, Breda Aliz, Fischer Michael, Globits Sebastian, Grote Vincent, Kiesl David, Mayr Karl, Muntean Michael, Podolsky Andrea, Niebauer Josef, Crutzen Rik, Kulnik Stefan Tino

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.

Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2023 Dec 10;9:20552076231219437. doi: 10.1177/20552076231219437. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076231219437
PMID:38089166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10714890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Digital health technologies offer great potential to improve access and adherence to cardiovascular disease secondary prevention measures such as regular physical activity (PA). However, the use and perceptions of digital technology (DT) among cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients are not well understood. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the use of DT in former CR patients' daily lives, for PA and for health information; and to gain insight into patient perceptions of DT for PA, including barriers, facilitators and requested features.

METHODS

A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted between May 2022 and January 2023. Five Austrian CR centres contacted 500 former patients who had completed a phase 2 CR programme from January 2019 onwards. One-hundred seventeen patients (mean [SD] age, 69 ± 10 years, 22% female) responded. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted for closed and open-ended questions, respectively.

RESULTS

Results indicated high DT usage for communication and informational aspects, and to a large extent also for PA and health information seeking. Main facilitators of DT use for PA were attributed to health and behavioural monitoring. Main barriers were lack of perceived need, lack of interest and poor usability. Most frequently requested features included pulse and blood pressure measurement, step count and compatibility to other devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients generally used and perceived DT as beneficial in daily life and for secondary prevention purposes such as PA. The survey identified facilitators, barriers and feature requests, which may inform the design and implementation of digital health interventions for CR patients.

摘要

目的

数字健康技术在改善心血管疾病二级预防措施(如定期体育活动)的可及性和依从性方面具有巨大潜力。然而,心脏康复(CR)患者对数字技术(DT)的使用情况和看法尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是探讨DT在既往CR患者日常生活中用于体育活动和健康信息的情况;并深入了解患者对DT用于体育活动的看法,包括障碍、促进因素和所需功能。

方法

2022年5月至2023年1月进行了一项横断面邮寄调查。五个奥地利CR中心联系了500名自2019年1月起完成第二阶段CR计划的既往患者。117名患者(平均[标准差]年龄,69±10岁,22%为女性)做出了回应。分别对封闭式和开放式问题进行了描述性分析和主题分析。

结果

结果表明,DT在通信和信息方面的使用率很高,在很大程度上也用于体育活动和健康信息查询。DT用于体育活动的主要促进因素归因于健康和行为监测。主要障碍是缺乏感知需求、缺乏兴趣和可用性差。最常要求的功能包括脉搏和血压测量、步数计数以及与其他设备的兼容性。

结论

患者通常在日常生活中使用DT,并认为其对体育活动等二级预防目的有益。该调查确定了促进因素、障碍和功能需求,这可能为CR患者数字健康干预措施的设计和实施提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/07ab1a45ca44/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/0d9b0825398e/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/bd78cd49af9d/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/13a34c20de90/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/61556cc8d6ec/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/07ab1a45ca44/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/0d9b0825398e/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/bd78cd49af9d/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/13a34c20de90/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/61556cc8d6ec/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9341/10714890/07ab1a45ca44/10.1177_20552076231219437-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Use and perceptions of digital technology for daily life, physical activity and health information among former cardiac rehabilitation patients in Austria: A cross-sectional survey.奥地利既往心脏康复患者对数字技术在日常生活、体育活动及健康信息方面的使用情况与认知:一项横断面调查
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 10;9:20552076231219437. doi: 10.1177/20552076231219437. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Exploring physical activity preferences and motivation in long-term cardiac prevention: An Austrian cross-sectional survey.探索长期心脏预防中的体力活动偏好和动机:一项奥地利横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0302226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302226. eCollection 2024.
3
Barriers and facilitators to participating in cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity: A cross-sectional survey.参与心脏康复和体育活动的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面调查。
World J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 26;14(2):83-95. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i2.83.
4
Patients' experiences and perspectives regarding the use of digital technology to support exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a qualitative interview study.患者关于使用数字技术支持基于运动的心脏康复的体验和观点:一项定性访谈研究
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Mar 18;6:1371652. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1371652. eCollection 2024.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Barriers and facilitators to participating in cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity in a remote and rural population: A cross-sectional survey.偏远农村地区人群参与心脏康复和体力活动的障碍和促进因素:一项横断面调查。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(5):697-706. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0091. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey.德国的数字化与健康:全国性横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 22;7(11):e32951. doi: 10.2196/32951.
8
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Digital Mental Health Interventions as Perceived by Primary Care Decision Makers: Content Analysis of Structured Open-Ended Survey Data.基层医疗决策者所认为的数字心理健康干预实施的障碍与促进因素:结构化开放式调查数据的内容分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 26;10:e44688. doi: 10.2196/44688.
9
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Digital Tools in Primary Care to Deliver Physical Activity Advice: Semistructured Interviews and Thematic Analysis.基层医疗中使用数字工具提供身体活动建议的障碍与促进因素:半结构化访谈与主题分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Aug 30;9(3):e35070. doi: 10.2196/35070.
10
Longitudinal study of the relationship between patients' medication adherence and quality of life outcomes and illness perceptions and beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation.患者用药依从性与生活质量结局及对心脏康复的疾病认知和信念之间关系的纵向研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01378-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical, Psychological, Physiological, and Technical Parameters and Their Relationship With Digital Tool Use During Cardiac Rehabilitation: Comparison and Correlation Study.心脏康复期间的临床、心理、生理和技术参数及其与数字工具使用的关系:比较与相关性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 8;13:e57413. doi: 10.2196/57413.
2
Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA): A Secondary Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data.德文版快速身体活动评估量表(RAPA)的心理测量学验证:横断面调查数据的二次分析
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):e70353. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70353. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation to German and linguistic validation of the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) questionnaire.德文翻译及 Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) 问卷的语言验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 31;7(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00649-w.
2
Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review.使用共同设计方法学开发心血管疾病二级预防干预措施:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):16-29. doi: 10.1111/hex.13633. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
European Health Data Space-An Opportunity Now to Grasp the Future of Data-Driven Healthcare.
欧洲健康数据空间——把握数据驱动型医疗未来的契机
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;10(9):1629. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091629.
4
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Toolkit for Digital Health.通用数据保护条例(GDPR)数字健康工具包。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:222-226. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220066.
5
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.有意义的患者和公众参与数字健康创新、实施和评估:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13506. Epub 2022 May 8.
6
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies With the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC).2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南:由临床实践中心血管疾病预防特别工作组制定,成员包括欧洲心脏病学会及12个医学学会代表,并得到欧洲预防心脏病学协会(EAPC)的特别贡献。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 May;75(5):429. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.04.003.
7
Health literacy interventions for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a scoping review.健康素养干预在冠心病二级预防中的应用:系统评价。
Open Heart. 2022 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001895.
8
Using Co-design in Mobile Health System Development: A Qualitative Study With Experts in Co-design and Mobile Health System Development.运用共同设计于移动医疗系统发展:与共同设计和移动医疗系统发展专家的定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 10;9(11):e27896. doi: 10.2196/27896.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review.老年人使用电子健康的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w.
10
Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?我应该让谁参与我的研究,为什么?患者、护理人员还是公众?
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00282-1.