• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗中心对脑膜瘤进行分割的经过良好训练的模型的性能测试:基于四个回顾性多中心数据集的二次分析。

Performance Test of a Well-Trained Model for Meningioma Segmentation in Health Care Centers: Secondary Analysis Based on Four Retrospective Multicenter Data Sets.

机构信息

Neurosurgery Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e44119. doi: 10.2196/44119.

DOI:10.2196/44119
PMID:38100181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10757229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have produced state-of-the-art results in meningioma segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, images obtained from different institutions, protocols, or scanners may show significant domain shift, leading to performance degradation and challenging model deployment in real clinical scenarios.

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to investigate the realistic performance of a well-trained meningioma segmentation model when deployed across different health care centers and verify the methods to enhance its generalization.

METHODS

This study was performed in four centers. A total of 606 patients with 606 MRIs were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2021. Manual segmentations, determined through consensus readings by neuroradiologists, were used as the ground truth mask. The model was previously trained using a standard supervised CNN called Deeplab V3+ and was deployed and tested separately in four health care centers. To determine the appropriate approach to mitigating the observed performance degradation, two methods were used: unsupervised domain adaptation and supervised retraining.

RESULTS

The trained model showed a state-of-the-art performance in tumor segmentation in two health care institutions, with a Dice ratio of 0.887 (SD 0.108, 95% CI 0.903-0.925) in center A and a Dice ratio of 0.874 (SD 0.800, 95% CI 0.854-0.894) in center B. Whereas in the other health care institutions, the performance declined, with Dice ratios of 0.631 (SD 0.157, 95% CI 0.556-0.707) in center C and 0.649 (SD 0.187, 95% CI 0.566-0.732) in center D, as they obtained the MRI using different scanning protocols. The unsupervised domain adaptation showed a significant improvement in performance scores, with Dice ratios of 0.842 (SD 0.073, 95% CI 0.820-0.864) in center C and 0.855 (SD 0.097, 95% CI 0.826-0.886) in center D. Nonetheless, it did not overperform the supervised retraining, which achieved Dice ratios of 0.899 (SD 0.026, 95% CI 0.889-0.906) in center C and 0.886 (SD 0.046, 95% CI 0.870-0.903) in center D.

CONCLUSIONS

Deploying the trained CNN model in different health care institutions may show significant performance degradation due to the domain shift of MRIs. Under this circumstance, the use of unsupervised domain adaptation or supervised retraining should be considered, taking into account the balance between clinical requirements, model performance, and the size of the available data.

摘要

背景

卷积神经网络(CNN)在磁共振成像(MRI)上的脑膜瘤分割方面取得了最先进的成果。然而,来自不同机构、协议或扫描仪的图像可能会显示出显著的领域转移,导致性能下降,并在实际临床场景中难以部署模型。

目的

本研究旨在研究经过充分训练的脑膜瘤分割模型在跨不同医疗机构部署时的实际性能,并验证增强其泛化能力的方法。

方法

本研究在四个中心进行。2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,共纳入 606 名患者的 606 份 MRI。手动分割是通过神经放射科医生的共识阅读确定的,作为地面真实掩模。该模型之前是使用称为 Deeplab V3+的标准监督卷积神经网络进行训练的,并分别在四个医疗机构中进行部署和测试。为了确定减轻观察到的性能下降的适当方法,使用了两种方法:无监督域自适应和有监督再训练。

结果

在两个医疗机构中,经过训练的模型在肿瘤分割方面表现出色,在机构 A 中,Dice 比为 0.887(SD 0.108,95%CI 0.903-0.925),在机构 B 中,Dice 比为 0.874(SD 0.800,95%CI 0.854-0.894)。然而,在其他医疗机构中,性能下降,在机构 C 中,Dice 比为 0.631(SD 0.157,95%CI 0.556-0.707),在机构 D 中,Dice 比为 0.649(SD 0.187,95%CI 0.566-0.732),因为它们使用不同的扫描协议获得了 MRI。无监督域自适应在性能评分方面显示出显著的提高,在机构 C 中,Dice 比为 0.842(SD 0.073,95%CI 0.820-0.864),在机构 D 中,Dice 比为 0.855(SD 0.097,95%CI 0.826-0.886)。尽管如此,它并没有超过有监督再训练,后者在机构 C 中达到了 0.899(SD 0.026,95%CI 0.889-0.906)的 Dice 比,在机构 D 中达到了 0.886(SD 0.046,95%CI 0.870-0.903)的 Dice 比。

结论

在不同医疗机构中部署经过训练的 CNN 模型可能会由于 MRI 的领域转移而导致性能显著下降。在这种情况下,应考虑使用无监督域自适应或有监督再训练,同时考虑临床需求、模型性能和可用数据的大小之间的平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/93f1028cdc0d/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/640d129ceb35/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/85025b561942/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/538dfa639e89/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/3f92c6821ee0/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/1008f28bdd73/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/539ba8003fe0/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/93f1028cdc0d/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/640d129ceb35/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/85025b561942/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/538dfa639e89/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/3f92c6821ee0/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/1008f28bdd73/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/539ba8003fe0/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/810c/10757229/93f1028cdc0d/jmir_v25i1e44119_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance Test of a Well-Trained Model for Meningioma Segmentation in Health Care Centers: Secondary Analysis Based on Four Retrospective Multicenter Data Sets.在医疗中心对脑膜瘤进行分割的经过良好训练的模型的性能测试:基于四个回顾性多中心数据集的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e44119. doi: 10.2196/44119.
2
Multicenter Study of the Utility of Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer Models for the Detection and Segmentation of Meningiomas.多中心研究卷积神经网络和转换器模型在脑膜瘤检测和分割中的应用。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2024;48(3):480-490. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001565. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Eye Tracking for Deep Learning Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks.基于卷积神经网络的深度学习分割的眼动追踪。
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00220-4.
4
Automated Meningioma Segmentation in Multiparametric MRI : Comparable Effectiveness of a Deep Learning Model and Manual Segmentation.多参数磁共振成像中脑膜瘤的自动分割:深度学习模型与手动分割的等效有效性
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;31(2):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00884-4. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Semi-supervised learning for automatic segmentation of the knee from MRI with convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的膝关节 MRI 半自动分割的半监督学习。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jun;189:105328. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105328. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
6
Fully Automated MRI Segmentation and Volumetric Measurement of Intracranial Meningioma Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的颅内脑膜瘤全自动 MRI 分割与容量测量。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Mar;57(3):871-881. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28332. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
A dual-branch hybrid dilated CNN model for the AI-assisted segmentation of meningiomas in MR images.一种用于 AI 辅助磁共振图像脑膜瘤分割的双分支混合扩张卷积神经网络模型。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Dec;151(Pt A):106279. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106279. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
SegAE: Unsupervised white matter lesion segmentation from brain MRIs using a CNN autoencoder.SegAE:基于 CNN 自动编码器的脑 MRI 无监督白质病变分割。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102085. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102085. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
9
Unsupervised domain adaptation method for segmenting cross-sectional CCA images.用于分割横断面颈总动脉图像的无监督域适应方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107037. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107037. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
Automatic segmentation of the thalamus using a massively trained 3D convolutional neural network: higher sensitivity for the detection of reduced thalamus volume by improved inter-scanner stability.使用大规模训练的 3D 卷积神经网络进行丘脑自动分割:通过提高扫描仪间稳定性来提高检测丘脑体积减小的灵敏度。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):1852-1861. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09170-y. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-modal deep learning model for prediction of Ki-67 for meningiomas using pretreatment MR images.一种使用预处理磁共振图像预测脑膜瘤Ki-67的多模态深度学习模型。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025 Jan 21;9(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-00811-1.
2
Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Models in Meningioma Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.卷积神经网络模型在磁共振成像中脑膜瘤分割的性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuroinformatics. 2025 Jan;23(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma segmentation and present potential for improvement of clinical practice.深度神经网络可以实现专家级别的脑脑膜瘤分割,具有改善临床实践的潜力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 14;12(1):15462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19356-5.
2
Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine.计算医学中的算法公平性。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Oct;84:104250. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104250. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Volumetric measurement of intracranial meningiomas: a comparison between linear, planimetric, and machine learning with multiparametric voxel-based morphometry methods.
颅内脑膜瘤的容积测量:线性、平面和基于多参数体素形态计量学方法的机器学习方法的比较。
J Neurooncol. 2023 Jan;161(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04127-z. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Contrast enhancement in cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy: a comparison of T1 TSE and MPRAGE sequences.脑肾上腺脑白质营养不良的对比增强:T1加权快速自旋回波序列与三维扰相梯度回波序列的比较
Jpn J Radiol. 2022 Dec;40(12):1241-1245. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01309-7. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Fully Automated MRI Segmentation and Volumetric Measurement of Intracranial Meningioma Using Deep Learning.基于深度学习的颅内脑膜瘤全自动 MRI 分割与容量测量。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Mar;57(3):871-881. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28332. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of meningioma from multiparametric MRI for preoperative meningioma differentiation using radiomic features: a multicentre study.基于深度学习的多参数 MRI 脑膜瘤自动分割用于术前脑膜瘤分化的放射组学特征:一项多中心研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):7248-7259. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08749-9. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
7
Automatic Meningioma Segmentation and Grading Prediction: A Hybrid Deep-Learning Method.自动脑膜瘤分割与分级预测:一种混合深度学习方法。
J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):786. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080786.
8
A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation.无监督深度域适应研究
ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2020 Sep;11(5):1-46. doi: 10.1145/3400066. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
9
EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas.EANO 指南:脑膜瘤的诊断与管理。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Nov 2;23(11):1821-1834. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150.
10
Structure-Driven Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Cross-Modality Cardiac Segmentation.基于结构的无监督跨模态心脏分割领域自适应方法。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Dec;40(12):3604-3616. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3090432. Epub 2021 Nov 30.