LUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
LUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 14;13(12):e077093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093.
According to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, the theorisation of how multilevel, multicomponent interventions work and the understanding of their interaction with their implementation context are necessary to be able to evaluate them beyond their complexity. More research is needed to provide good examples following this approach in order to produce evidence-based information on implementation practices.
This article reports on the results of the process evaluation of a complex mental health intervention in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) tested through a pilot study. The overarching aim is to contribute to the evidence base related to the recruitment, engagement and implementation strategies of applied mental health interventions in the workplace.
The Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings (MENTUPP) intervention was pilot tested in 25 SMEs in three work sectors and nine countries. The evaluation strategy of the pilot test relied on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The process evaluation was inspired by the RE-AIM framework and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes suggested by Proctor and colleagues and focused on seven dimensions: reach, adoption, implementation, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and maintenance.
Factors facilitating implementation included the variety of the provided materials, the support provided by the research officers (ROs) and the existence of a structured plan for implementation, among others. Main barriers to implementation were the difficulty of talking about mental health, familiarisation with technology, difficulty in fitting the intervention into the daily routine and restrictions caused by COVID-19.
The results will be used to optimise the MENTUPP intervention and the theoretical framework that we developed to evaluate the causal mechanisms underlying MENTUPP. Conducting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation contributes to the enhancement of the evidence base related to mental health interventions in the workplace and it can be used as a guide to overcome their contextual complexity.
ISRCTN14582090.
根据医学研究委员会(MRC)框架,需要对多层次、多成分干预措施的作用机制进行理论化,并了解其与实施环境的相互作用,以便能够超越其复杂性对其进行评估。需要更多的研究来提供遵循这种方法的良好范例,以便就实施实践提供基于证据的信息。
本文报告了通过试点研究测试的复杂心理健康干预措施的过程评估结果。总体目标是为工作场所应用心理健康干预措施的招募、参与和实施策略的循证信息做出贡献。
MENTUPP 干预措施在三个工作部门和九个国家的 25 家中小企业中进行了试点测试。试点测试的评估策略依赖于混合方法,结合了定性和定量研究方法。过程评估受 RE-AIM 框架和 Proctor 及其同事提出的实施结果分类法的启发,重点关注七个维度:覆盖范围、采用、实施、可接受性、适宜性、可行性和维护。
促进实施的因素包括提供的材料种类繁多、研究人员(RO)提供的支持以及存在结构化的实施计划等。实施的主要障碍包括难以谈论心理健康问题、对技术的熟悉程度、难以将干预措施融入日常工作以及 COVID-19 造成的限制。
这些结果将用于优化 MENTUPP 干预措施和我们开发的评估 MENTUPP 因果机制的理论框架。进行这种系统和全面的过程评估有助于增强与工作场所心理健康干预措施相关的循证基础,并可作为克服其背景复杂性的指南。
ISRCTN85246603。