The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Blalock Building, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Feb;49(2):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04122-6. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
Delay in diagnosis can contribute to poor outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and new tools for early detection are required. Recent application of artificial intelligence to cancer imaging has demonstrated great potential in detecting subtle early lesions. The aim of the study was to evaluate global and local accuracies of deep neural network (DNN) segmentation of normal and abnormal pancreas with pancreatic mass.
Our previously developed and reported residual deep supervision network for segmentation of PDAC was applied to segment pancreas using CT images of potential renal donors (normal pancreas) and patients with suspected PDAC (abnormal pancreas). Accuracy of DNN pancreas segmentation was assessed using DICE simulation coefficient (DSC), average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), and Hausdorff distance 95% percentile (HD95) as compared to manual segmentation. Furthermore, two radiologists semi-quantitatively assessed local accuracies and estimated volume of correctly segmented pancreas.
Forty-two normal and 49 abnormal CTs were assessed. Average DSC was 87.4 ± 3.1% and 85.5 ± 3.2%, ASSD 0.97 ± 0.30 and 1.34 ± 0.65, HD95 4.28 ± 2.36 and 6.31 ± 6.31 for normal and abnormal pancreas, respectively. Semi-quantitatively, ≥95% of pancreas volume was correctly segmented in 95.2% and 53.1% of normal and abnormal pancreas by both radiologists, and 97.6% and 75.5% by at least one radiologist. Most common segmentation errors were made on pancreatic and duodenal borders in both groups, and related to pancreatic tumor including duct dilatation, atrophy, tumor infiltration and collateral vessels.
Pancreas DNN segmentation is accurate in a majority of cases, however, minor manual editing may be necessary; particularly in abnormal pancreas.
在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中,诊断延迟可能导致不良预后,因此需要新的早期检测工具。最近,人工智能在癌症成像中的应用已经显示出在检测细微早期病变方面的巨大潜力。本研究的目的是评估深度神经网络(DNN)对伴有胰腺肿块的正常和异常胰腺的全局和局部分割准确性。
我们应用之前开发和报道的用于 PDAC 分割的残差深度监督网络,对潜在肾供体(正常胰腺)和疑似 PDAC 患者(异常胰腺)的 CT 图像进行胰腺分割。使用 DICE 模拟系数(DSC)、平均对称表面距离(ASSD)和 Hausdorff 距离 95%分位数(HD95)与手动分割相比,评估 DNN 胰腺分割的准确性。此外,两位放射科医生对局部准确性进行半定量评估,并估计正确分割的胰腺体积。
评估了 42 例正常和 49 例异常 CT。平均 DSC 分别为 87.4±3.1%和 85.5±3.2%,ASSD 分别为 0.97±0.30 和 1.34±0.65,HD95 分别为 4.28±2.36 和 6.31±6.31。半定量评估结果显示,两位放射科医生分别有 95.2%和 53.1%的正常和异常胰腺的胰腺体积得到了正确分割,至少有一位放射科医生的正确分割率分别为 97.6%和 75.5%。在两组中,最常见的分割错误发生在胰腺和十二指肠边界,与胰腺肿瘤包括胰管扩张、萎缩、肿瘤浸润和侧支血管有关。
在大多数情况下,胰腺 DNN 分割是准确的,但可能需要进行少量手动编辑;特别是在异常胰腺中。