• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部胸腔内应用氨甲环酸治疗胸外科手术安全性和有效性的评估:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Topical Intrapleural Application of Tranexamic Acid in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231218215. doi: 10.1177/10760296231218215.

DOI:10.1177/10760296231218215
PMID:38115686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10734325/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bleeding remains a common complication post-thoracic surgery. Although intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease blood loss, its use has been associated with adverse effects. Accordingly, topical TXA has been proposed as an alternative to reduce bleeding with fewer systemic complications.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical TXA versus control (i.e., placebo) in patients undergoing thoracic procedures. The primary outcome was total postoperative blood loss at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included were the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Meta-analyses were pooled using mean difference with inverse-variance weighting and random-effects.

RESULTS

Out of the 575 unique studies that were screened, we identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 399 patients. Out of the three RCTs analyzed, two studies, accounting for 67% of the total, were found to have a low risk of bias. The primary outcome of 24-h post-operative blood loss was significantly lower in patients who received TXA (mean difference [MD] -93.6 ml, 95% CI -121.8 to -65.4 ml, I= 45%). In addition, the need for RBC transfusion was significantly lower in the topical TXA group compared to control (MD -0.5 units, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3 units, I= 60%). However, there was no significant difference in the hospital length of stay (LOS) (MD -0.3 days, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.4 days, I= 0%). These results remained consistent after several sensitivity analyses. The use of topical intrapleural tranexamic acid has also been found to be safe without any significant safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

Topical intrapleural TXA reduces blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during thoracic surgery. In addition, there is no evidence of the increased safety concerns associated with its use. Larger trials are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dosages.

摘要

目的

出血仍然是胸部手术后常见的并发症。尽管静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)已被证明可减少失血,但它的使用与不良反应有关。因此,局部使用 TXA 已被提议作为减少出血的替代方法,其全身并发症较少。

方法

我们在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 数据库中检索了比较局部 TXA 与对照(即安慰剂)在接受胸部手术的患者中的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是术后 24 小时的总术后失血量。次要结局包括红细胞(RBC)输血的数量和住院时间(LOS)。使用均值差和倒数方差加权法进行了荟萃分析,并采用随机效应模型。

结果

在筛选出的 575 篇独特研究中,我们确定了三项涉及 399 名患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。在分析的三项 RCT 中,有两项(占总数的 67%)被发现存在低偏倚风险。接受 TXA 的患者术后 24 小时的主要结局(24 小时内失血量)明显较低(平均差值 [MD] -93.6ml,95%CI -121.8 至 -65.4ml,I=45%)。此外,与对照组相比,局部 TXA 组的 RBC 输血需求明显降低(MD -0.5 单位,95%CI -0.8 至 -0.3 单位,I=60%)。然而,两组间住院时间(LOS)差异无统计学意义(MD -0.3 天,95%CI -0.9 至 0.4 天,I=0%)。这些结果在进行了几次敏感性分析后仍然一致。局部使用胸腔内 TXA 也被发现是安全的,没有明显的安全问题。

结论

局部胸腔内 TXA 可减少胸部手术后的失血量和输血需求。此外,没有证据表明其使用与安全性问题有关。需要更大规模的试验来验证这些发现,并评估不同剂量的安全性和疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/c730502966f6/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/76c8089c698b/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/5b828a2070fa/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/d76c4ade27ab/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/6b7d2a2fbb63/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/ce23cb15b64e/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/c730502966f6/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/76c8089c698b/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/5b828a2070fa/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/d76c4ade27ab/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/6b7d2a2fbb63/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/ce23cb15b64e/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc89/10734325/c730502966f6/10.1177_10760296231218215-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Topical Intrapleural Application of Tranexamic Acid in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.局部胸腔内应用氨甲环酸治疗胸外科手术安全性和有效性的评估:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231218215. doi: 10.1177/10760296231218215.
2
Is combined topical with intravenous tranexamic acid superior than topical, intravenous tranexamic acid alone and control groups for blood loss controlling after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术后控制失血方面,局部联合静脉注射氨甲环酸是否优于单独使用局部或静脉注射氨甲环酸及对照组:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(51):e5344. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005344.
3
Most Effective Regimen of Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.氨甲环酸减少初次全膝关节置换术中出血及输血的最有效方案:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Knee Surg. 2018 Aug;31(7):654-663. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606376. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
The efficacy and safety of combined administration of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.静脉注射与局部应用氨甲环酸联合用于初次全膝关节置换术的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 7;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2181-9.
5
Prophylactic Topical Tranexamic Acid Versus Placebo in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis∗.预防性局部使用氨甲环酸与安慰剂在手术患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析∗。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):676-683. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003896.
6
A comparison of combined intravenous and topical administration of tranexamic acid with intravenous tranexamic acid alone for blood loss reduction after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.关节置换术围手术期局部与静脉联合应用氨甲环酸减少失血量的系统评价:一项荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸在减少脊柱侧弯手术失血中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):131-139. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4899-0. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
8
Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in primary total hip replacement: A meta-analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中静脉注射与局部应用氨甲环酸的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5573. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005573.
9
Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.氨甲环酸治疗胸外科手术患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和 PRISMA 符合的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Apr 9;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02716-9.
10
Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis).氨甲环酸用于鼻出血患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 31;12(12):CD004328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004328.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.局部应用氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):796-805. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0199.

本文引用的文献

1
Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider.Meta分析的固定效应模型与随机效应模型:三点需考虑之处。
Global Spine J. 2022 Sep;12(7):1624-1626. doi: 10.1177/21925682221110527. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Tranexamic Acid in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氨甲环酸治疗胃肠道出血:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):e313-e319. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005362.
3
Perioperative hyperfibrinolysis - physiology and pathophysiology.围手术期过度纤溶——生理学和病理生理学。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;71(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.007. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
4
Prophylactic Topical Tranexamic Acid Versus Placebo in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis∗.预防性局部使用氨甲环酸与安慰剂在手术患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析∗。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):676-683. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003896.
5
Evaluation of local intra-pleural application of tranexamic acid on postoperative blood loss in lung decortication surgery, a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.氨甲环酸局部胸膜腔内应用对肺纤维板剥脱术术后失血影响的评估:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):409-412. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_231_17.
6
The effects of lysine analogs during pelvic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.赖氨酸类似物在盆腔手术中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transfus Med Rev. 2014 Jul;28(3):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 18.
7
Risks of harms using antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies.心脏手术中使用抗纤维蛋白溶解药物的危害风险:随机和观察性研究的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 11;345:e5798. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5798.
8
Can topical application of tranexamic acid reduce blood loss in thoracic surgery? A prospective randomised double blind investigation.局部应用氨甲环酸能否减少胸外科手术中的失血?一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2012 Nov;21(11):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
9
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
10
Surgical reexploration after cardiac operations: why a worse outcome?心脏手术后再次手术探查:为何预后更差?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Nov;86(5):1557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.114.