Suppr超能文献

氨甲环酸治疗胃肠道出血:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Tranexamic Acid in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):e313-e319. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005362.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Tranexamic acid is proposed as a treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding. The Haemorrhage Alleviation with Tranexamic Acid-Intestinal System trial evaluated extended-use (24 hr) high-dose tranexamic acid, prompting a reappraisal for tranexamic acid in gastrointestinal bleeding.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tranexamic acid with usual care or placebo in adults with gastrointestinal bleeding. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception to September 2019).

DATA SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool in duplicate. The main outcomes were mortality, bleeding, and adverse events.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were analyzed as high-dose IV tranexamic acid versus all other dosing strategies for tranexamic acid using fixed-effects models. We assessed certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Five randomized controlled trials evaluated extended-use high-dose IV tranexamic acid, seven evaluating low-dose IV or enteral tranexamic acid. Extended-use high-dose IV tranexamic acid did not reduce mortality (relative risk, 0.98%; 95% CI, 0.88-1.09; I2 = 63%; high certainty) or bleeding (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.04; p = 0.17 and absolute risk differences, -0.7%; 95% CI, -1.5 to 0.3; high certainty) but resulted in a small increase in deep venous thrombosis (relative risk, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.08-3.72; I2 = 0%), pulmonary embolism (relative risk, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-3.0; I2 = 0%), and seizure (relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.03-2.93) with high certainty. Low-dose IV/enteral tranexamic acid did not reduce mortality (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.09; I2 = 0%) but did reduce risk of rebleeding (relative risk, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.33-0.75; I2 = 9%) and need for surgery (relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88; I2 = 11%), with moderate certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended-use high-dose IV tranexamic acid does not improve mortality or bleeding outcomes and increases adverse events. Low-dose/enteral tranexamic acid may be effective in reducing hemorrhage; more evidence is required to demonstrate its safety.

摘要

目的

氨甲环酸被提议用于治疗胃肠道出血。Haemorrhage Alleviation with Tranexamic Acid-Intestinal System 试验评估了延长使用(24 小时)高剂量氨甲环酸,这促使人们重新评估氨甲环酸在胃肠道出血中的作用。

资料来源

我们系统地回顾和荟萃分析了比较氨甲环酸与成人胃肠道出血常规治疗或安慰剂的随机对照试验。我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL(从开始到 2019 年 9 月)中进行了搜索。

资料选择

两名审查员独立筛选引文、提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具重复评估偏倚风险。主要结局是死亡率、出血和不良事件。

资料提取

研究采用固定效应模型,将高剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸与所有其他剂量策略进行比较。我们使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法评估证据的确定性。

资料综合

五项随机对照试验评估了延长使用高剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸,七项试验评估了低剂量静脉注射或肠内氨甲环酸。延长使用高剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸并未降低死亡率(相对风险,0.98%;95%CI,0.88-1.09;I2=63%;高确定性)或出血(相对风险,0.92;95%CI,0.82-1.04;p=0.17 和绝对风险差异,-0.7%;95%CI,-1.5 至 0.3;高确定性),但导致深静脉血栓形成(相对风险,2.01;95%CI,1.08-3.72;I2=0%)、肺栓塞(相对风险,1.78;95%CI,1.06-3.0;I2=0%)和癫痫发作(相对风险,1.73;95%CI,1.03-2.93)的风险略有增加,确定性为高。低剂量静脉/肠内氨甲环酸并未降低死亡率(相对风险,0.62;95%CI,0.36-1.09;I2=0%),但降低了再出血(相对风险,0.5;95%CI,0.33-0.75;I2=9%)和手术需求(相对风险,0.58;95%CI,0.38-0.88;I2=11%)的风险,确定性为中。

结论

延长使用高剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸不能改善死亡率或出血结局,并增加不良事件。低剂量/肠内氨甲环酸可能有效减少出血;需要更多证据来证明其安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验