Suppr超能文献

视网膜脱离结局研究(REDOS):一项析因、随机对照试验的研究方案。

REtinal Detachment Outcomes Study (REDOS): study protocol for a factorial, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050 Ch Ste-Foy Street, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Dec 20;24(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07815-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few large randomized controlled trials provide strong evidence to guide surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. The purpose of this factorial, single-blind, randomized controlled trial is to analyze and compare the surgical outcomes, functional visual outcomes, complications, and quality of life associated with RRD repair using (A) pars plana vitrectomy only (PPV) or PPV with scleral buckle (PPV-SB) and (B) sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF) or perfluoropropane gas (CF) tamponade.

METHODS

Eligible patients with moderately complex RRD will be randomized 1:1 to PPV or PPV-SB and 1:1 to SF or CF gas tamponade. Approximately 560 patients will be recruited to be able to detect a difference of around 10% in SSAS rate between the groups. Patients will be followed using multimodal imaging and quality of life questionnaires after the surgical repair until 1 year postoperative. The primary outcome will be a single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS), defined as the absence of reoperation for recurrent RRD in the operating room. Secondary outcomes will be pinhole visual acuity (PHVA) at 8-10 weeks and 6 months, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), final retina status (i.e., attached or detached), time to onset of RRD recurrence, severity and number of complications, and questionnaire results.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first 2 × 2 factorial RCT examining repair techniques in primary RRD. It will also be the first RCT to compare gas tamponade between the two most common agents. Notably, it will be adequately powered to detect a clinically significant effect size. The use of multimodal imaging will also be a novel aspect of this study, allowing us to compare head-to-head the impact of adding an SB to the retina's recovery after RRD repair and of differing gas tamponades. Until now, the treatment of RRD has been largely guided by pragmatic retrospective cohort studies. There is a lack of strong evidence guiding therapeutic decisions and this trial will address (1) whether supplemental SB is justified and (2) whether longer duration gas tamponade with CF is necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05863312. Registered on 18 May 2023.

摘要

背景

很少有大型随机对照试验提供强有力的证据来指导原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复的手术治疗。本项析因、单盲、随机对照试验的目的是分析和比较单纯玻璃体切除术(PPV)或玻璃体切除术联合巩膜扣带术(PPV-SB)以及六氟化硫(SF)或全氟丙烷(CF)气体填充治疗 RRD 的手术结果、功能视觉结果、并发症和生活质量,并比较两者。

方法

符合条件的中度复杂 RRD 患者将按 1:1 比例随机分配至 PPV 或 PPV-SB 组,以及 SF 或 CF 气体填充组。大约需要招募 560 名患者,以便能够检测出两组间 SSAS 率的差异约为 10%。患者将在手术后使用多模态成像和生活质量问卷进行随访,直至术后 1 年。主要结局是单次手术解剖成功(SSAS),定义为在手术室中无需再次手术治疗复发性 RRD。次要结局将是 8-10 周和 6 个月时的小孔视力(PHVA)、最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、最终视网膜状态(即附着或脱离)、RRD 复发的起始时间、严重程度和并发症数量以及问卷结果。

讨论

这将是第一项关于原发性 RRD 修复技术的 2×2 析因 RCT,也是第一项比较两种最常用的气体填充剂的 RCT。值得注意的是,该试验具有足够的效力来检测到具有临床意义的效应量。多模态成像的使用也是该研究的一个新方面,它使我们能够直接比较在 RRD 修复后添加巩膜扣带对视网膜恢复的影响以及不同的气体填充剂的影响。到目前为止,RRD 的治疗主要是基于实用的回顾性队列研究。缺乏指导治疗决策的有力证据,本试验将解决(1)补充巩膜扣带是否合理和(2)使用 CF 进行更长时间的气体填充是否必要的问题。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05863312,于 2023 年 5 月 18 日注册。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验