Li Ting, Wu Wenjun, Zhang Jianming, Wu Qinghang, Zhu Shenlong, Niu Erli, Wang Shengfeng, Jiang Chengying, Liu Daqun, Zhang Chengcheng
Food Science Institute, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
College of Food and Health, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Nov 23;12(12):2033. doi: 10.3390/antiox12122033.
Olive leaves are rich in phenolic compounds. This study explored the chemical profiles and contents of free phenolics (FPs) and bound phenolics (BPs) in olive leaves, and further investigated and compared the antioxidant properties of FPs and BPs using chemical assays, cellular antioxidant evaluation systems, and in vivo mouse models. The results showed that FPs and BPs have different phenolic profiles; 24 free and 14 bound phenolics were identified in FPs and BPs, respectively. Higher levels of phenolic acid (i.e., sinapinic acid, 4-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and caffeic acid) and hydroxytyrosol were detected in the BPs, while flavonoids, triterpenoid acids, and iridoids were more concentrated in the free form. FPs showed a significantly higher total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC), and chemical antioxidant properties than those of BPs ( < 0.05). Within the range of doses (20-250 μg/mL), both FPs and BPs protected HepG2 cells from HO-induced oxidative stress injury, and there was no significant difference in cellular antioxidant activity between FPs and BPs. The in vivo experiments suggested that FP and BP treatment inhibited malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in a D-galactose-induced oxidation model in mice, and significantly increased antioxidant enzyme activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), catalase (CAT), and the total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC). Mechanistically, FPs and BPs exert their antioxidant activity in distinct ways; FPs ameliorated D-galactose-induced oxidative stress injury partly via the activation of nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway, while the BP mechanisms need further study.
橄榄叶富含酚类化合物。本研究探究了橄榄叶中游离酚(FPs)和结合酚(BPs)的化学特征及含量,并使用化学分析、细胞抗氧化评估系统和体内小鼠模型进一步研究和比较了FPs和BPs的抗氧化特性。结果表明,FPs和BPs具有不同的酚类特征;在FPs和BPs中分别鉴定出24种游离酚和14种结合酚。在BPs中检测到较高水平的酚酸(即芥子酸、对香豆酸、阿魏酸和咖啡酸)和羟基酪醇,而黄酮类、三萜酸和环烯醚萜则以游离形式更为集中。FPs的总黄酮含量(TFC)、总酚含量(TPC)和化学抗氧化特性均显著高于BPs(<0.05)。在剂量范围(20 - 250μg/mL)内,FPs和BPs均能保护HepG2细胞免受HO诱导的氧化应激损伤,且FPs和BPs之间的细胞抗氧化活性无显著差异。体内实验表明,FP和BP处理在D - 半乳糖诱导的小鼠氧化模型中抑制了丙二醛(MDA)水平,并显著提高了超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH - Px)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)的抗氧化酶活性和总抗氧化能力(T - AOC)。从机制上讲,FPs和BPs以不同方式发挥其抗氧化活性;FPs部分通过激活核因子红细胞2相关因子2(Nrf2)信号通路改善D - 半乳糖诱导的氧化应激损伤,而BP的作用机制有待进一步研究。