Iova Camelia Florina, Badau Dana, Daina Mădălina Diana, Șuteu Corina Lacramioara, Daina Lucia Georgeta
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Doctoral School, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Faculty of Physical Education and Mountain Sports, Transilvania University, 500068 Brasov, Romania.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;11(12):1736. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121736.
This study aims to identify the presence of vaccine hesitancy and the factors that could have determined it in a group of mothers in the postpartum period, with an evaluation of both the level of knowledge and information, as well as the attitudes, perceptions, intentions and sources of information about vaccination. The study was based on a survey-Vaccine Hesitancy Identification Survey-applied in two maternity wards from Bihor County and structured into six subscales (34 items). Based on the answers to the key questions (""-item 1 of subscale 4; ""-item 4 of subscale 4), we identified two groups: the group of mothers without hesitant behavior (non-hesitant), called the group pro vaccine (GPV), and the group of mothers with hesitant behavior, called the group non vaccine (GNV). Vaccine hesitancy was identified in our study in 47.28% of the participants (191 of the 404 mothers included). Most of them come from an urban environment (57.59%), have university and post-secondary education (58.64%) and are prim parous (58.64%). The behavior of participants from GNV is influenced by a low level of knowledge and information regarding vaccination and by concerns related to adverse reactions, new vaccines and the number of vaccines administered. Also, this group is characterized by an increased perception of the risks related to vaccination, while the perception of the risks associated with the disease is low. For all subscales, important differences were registered between the two groups in favor of GPV, a group characterized by positive attitudes and perceptions and a better level of knowledge compared to GNV. This study aims to represent a starting point for the organization and running of information campaigns regarding vaccination at the level of Bihor County, especially in areas with low vaccination coverage, where this behavior is identified.
本研究旨在确定产后母亲群体中疫苗犹豫的存在情况以及可能导致疫苗犹豫的因素,同时评估她们的知识和信息水平,以及对疫苗接种的态度、认知、意图和信息来源。该研究基于一项名为“疫苗犹豫识别调查”的问卷调查,在比霍尔县的两个产科病房进行,问卷分为六个子量表(共34个项目)。根据关键问题(量表4的项目1;量表4的项目4)的答案,我们确定了两组:无犹豫行为的母亲组(非犹豫组),称为支持疫苗组(GPV);有犹豫行为的母亲组,称为非疫苗组(GNV)。在我们的研究中,47.28%的参与者(404名母亲中的191名)存在疫苗犹豫。她们大多来自城市环境(57.59%),拥有大学及大专以上学历(58.64%),且为初产妇(58.64%)。GNV组参与者的行为受到疫苗接种知识和信息水平较低以及对不良反应、新疫苗和接种疫苗数量的担忧的影响。此外,该组对疫苗接种相关风险的认知较高,而对疾病相关风险的认知较低。在所有子量表方面,两组之间均存在有利于GPV组的显著差异,与GNV组相比,GPV组态度积极、认知良好且知识水平更高。本研究旨在为比霍尔县开展疫苗接种信息宣传活动提供一个起点,特别是在疫苗接种覆盖率较低且发现存在这种行为的地区。