Elcoro Mirari, Diller James W, Correa Juan C
Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Framingham State University, 100 State Street, Framingham, MA 01701 USA.
Department of Psychological Science, Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jul 26;46(3-4):431-446. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Several barriers may inhibit the growth of behavior analysis as a more integrated and collaborative field. Two such barriers are siloed environments that reinforce a basic-applied distinction, and a lack of translational research pathways. We describe the perils of silos, and elaborate on potential solutions to increase reciprocal relations among subfields in behavior analysis. We promote a five-tiered system to classify research in behavior analysis, and discuss literature on cultivating effective intra and cross-disciplinary collaborations, including using the framework of metacontingencies to understand collaborations. We also propose quantitative and qualitative measures to examine whether the potential solutions increase intra and interdisciplinary interactions. These measures include bibliometric (e.g., citations across fields), sociometric (e.g., social network analysis), and narrative analysis. We apply some of these measures to publications from 2011-2022 from the and , and argue that behavior analysis overall may benefit from a more collaborative approach.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-023-00386-x.
若干障碍可能会抑制行为分析作为一个更具整合性与协作性的领域的发展。其中两个障碍是强化基础研究与应用研究区分的孤立环境,以及缺乏转化研究途径。我们描述了孤立状态的危害,并详细阐述了增加行为分析子领域之间相互关系的潜在解决方案。我们推广一个五级系统来对行为分析研究进行分类,并讨论关于培养有效的学科内和跨学科合作的文献,包括使用元 contingency 框架来理解合作。我们还提出了定量和定性措施,以检验这些潜在解决方案是否增加了学科内和跨学科的互动。这些措施包括文献计量学(例如,跨领域引用)、社会计量学(例如,社会网络分析)和叙事分析。我们将其中一些措施应用于2011 - 2022年来自[具体出处1]和[具体出处2]的出版物,并认为行为分析总体上可能会从更具协作性的方法中受益。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40614 - 023 - 00386 - x获取的补充材料。