Turner Hannah, Rogers Briony, Kneebone Sarah, Ramirez Diego, French Matthew, Sawailau Mere Jane, Volavola Filise, Baran Sholyn, Matavesi Kelera, Newton Orlando, Luveniyali Maraia Batiota, Tela Autiko, Vakarewa Isoa
Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sustain Sci. 2024;19(2):647-664. doi: 10.1007/s11625-024-01478-6. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
Global challenges, such as climate change, persistent poverty, and food insecurity are complex problems. These societal, environmental, and economic challenges cross scientific disciplines, communities, and geographies, requiring interdisciplinary, North-South solutions. Nevertheless, prevailing sustainability science responses are Western-centric. Some seminal studies have attempted to understand and engage with diverse knowledge systems. These include decolonial and Indigenous methodologies, such as "Two-Eyed Seeing", which emphasizes the importance of using both Western and Indigenous knowledge to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the world, and participatory action research, which highlights the importance of involving participants in the research process and promoting social change through collaborative effort. However, apart from in-country research collaborations with traditional Indigenous knowledge, most North-South studies overlook the role or influence of Western-centric views and therefore fail to recognize and incorporate diverse worldviews and knowledge systems. This may, in part, reflect the tendency to categorize research into disciplinary silos, but more likely is the unintentional, yet prevalent, view that Western science is "objective and neutral." As more scholars from multiple disciplines and geographies focus on interdisciplinary North-South research, it is critical that researchers reflect on dominant research approaches and knowledge production. Studies can co-construct, reproduce, or control the forms of knowledge generated-whether intentional or unintentional. This paper presents an organizing framework to help researchers navigate, understand, and engage with diverse forms of knowledge in undertaking North-South research. The framework draws on empirical observations from the authors' interdisciplinary research and from empirical cross-cultural literature. It comprises three contextual levels of influence, featuring guiding principles and subsequent practical actions researchers can use to navigate the complexities of knowledge co-construction in North-South research.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-024-01478-6.
全球挑战,如气候变化、持续贫困和粮食不安全等都是复杂的问题。这些社会、环境和经济挑战跨越科学学科、社区和地域,需要跨学科的南北合作解决方案。然而,当前的可持续发展科学应对措施是以西方为中心的。一些开创性研究试图理解并与多样的知识体系互动。这些包括去殖民化和本土方法,如“双眼看世界”,它强调运用西方知识和本土知识以更全面地理解世界的重要性;还有参与式行动研究,它突出让参与者参与研究过程并通过合作努力促进社会变革的重要性。然而,除了与传统本土知识的国内研究合作外,大多数南北研究忽视了以西方为中心观点的作用或影响,因此未能认识和纳入多样的世界观和知识体系。这可能部分反映了将研究分类到学科孤岛的倾向,但更可能是那种认为西方科学“客观中立”的无意识却普遍存在的观点。随着来自多个学科和地域的更多学者专注于跨学科的南北研究,研究人员反思主导的研究方法和知识生产至关重要。研究可以共同构建、复制或控制所产生的知识形式——无论有意还是无意。本文提出一个组织框架,以帮助研究人员在进行南北研究时驾驭、理解并与多样的知识形式互动。该框架借鉴了作者跨学科研究以及实证跨文化文献中的实证观察。它包括三个影响的背景层面,具有指导原则以及研究人员可用于应对南北研究中知识共同构建复杂性的后续实际行动。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11625 - 024 - 01478 - 6获取的补充材料。