Akiyama Naomi, Kajiwara Shihoko, Matsunaga Atsushi, Hayashida Kenshi, Akiyama Tomoya
Graduate School of Nursing, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, JPN.
School of Nursing, Gifu University of Health Science, Gifu, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Nov 27;15(11):e49479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49479. eCollection 2023 Nov.
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, nursing education in Japan recommended the implementation of on-campus practical training as a substitute for hospital-based clinical training. This study explores nursing students' experiences with on-campus nursing training as an alternative to clinical practice by clarifying its advantages and disadvantages. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis and we included 26 articles in this study. Our findings reveal both the advantages of acquiring nursing knowledge, basic skills, and membership among students. Contrastingly, many students failed to acquire skills related to patient communication and flexible nursing care. Thus, despite some strengths, on-campus training is not a complete replacement for clinical training. Although this method has benefits in emergency situations, it is desirable to consider other educational methods in preparation for future pandemics.
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,日本的护理教育建议实施校内实践培训,以替代医院临床培训。本研究通过阐明校内护理培训的优缺点,探讨护理专业学生将其作为临床实践替代方式的体验。本综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目,本研究纳入了26篇文章。我们的研究结果揭示了学生在获取护理知识、基本技能以及形成团队归属感方面的优势。相比之下,许多学生未能掌握与患者沟通和灵活护理相关的技能。因此,尽管校内培训有一些优点,但它并不能完全替代临床培训。虽然这种方法在紧急情况下有好处,但为应对未来的大流行,考虑其他教育方法是可取的。