• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢西丁与克林霉素-庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。

Comparison of cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin for pelvic infections.

作者信息

Larsen J W, Voise C T, Grossman J H

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1986;9(1):77-83.

PMID:3815461
Abstract

Cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin were compared in a randomized study of antibiotic therapy for infections of the pelvis in 91 women. Clinical diagnoses included pelvic inflammatory disease (53), endomyometritis after cesarean section (24), and cellulitis following gynecological surgery (14). Treatment failures occurred in four (10%) of the 41 patients treated with cefoxitin compared with eight (16%) of the 50 patients treated with the clindamycin-gentamicin combination. Single-drug therapy with cefoxitin was shown to be as effective as the combination of clindamycin and gentamicin.

摘要

在一项针对91名女性骨盆感染的抗生素治疗随机研究中,对头孢西丁与克林霉素-庆大霉素进行了比较。临床诊断包括盆腔炎(53例)、剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎(24例)以及妇科手术后蜂窝织炎(14例)。接受头孢西丁治疗的41例患者中有4例(10%)治疗失败,而接受克林霉素-庆大霉素联合治疗的50例患者中有8例(16%)治疗失败。结果表明,头孢西丁单药治疗与克林霉素和庆大霉素联合治疗同样有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin for pelvic infections.头孢西丁与克林霉素-庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Clin Ther. 1986;9(1):77-83.
2
Piperacillin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec;64(6):762-6.
3
A randomized comparison of gentamicin-clindamycin and cefoxitin-doxycycline in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.庆大霉素-克林霉素与头孢西丁-多西环素治疗急性盆腔炎的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):867-72.
4
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.
5
Ciprofloxacin monotherapy for acute pelvic infections: a comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin.环丙沙星单药治疗急性盆腔感染:与克林霉素加庆大霉素的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):696-702.
6
Comparative clinical evaluation of ceftizoxime with clindamycin and gentamicin and cefoxitin in the treatment of postcesarean endomyometritis.头孢唑肟与克林霉素、庆大霉素及头孢西丁治疗剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎的临床对比评估
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Dec;161(6):518-22.
7
Cefoxitin versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of postcesarean section infections.
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;67(3):371-6.
8
Randomized comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam to cefoxitin and doxycycline or clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometritis.氨苄西林舒巴坦与头孢西丁及多西环素或克林霉素与庆大霉素治疗盆腔炎或子宫内膜炎的随机对照比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;83(6):998-1004. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00020.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of mezlocillin, cefoxitin, and clindamycin plus gentamicin in postpartum endometritis.
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):760-6.
10
Antimicrobial management of surgically treated gangrenous or perforated appendicitis: comparison of cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin.手术治疗坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎的抗菌药物管理:头孢西丁与克林霉素-庆大霉素的比较
Clin Ther. 1987;9(4):420-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.