His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service, Milton Keynes, UK.
Nottingham Trent University, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):2489-2502. doi: 10.1177/15248380231219251. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
Despite the available evidence identifying the high prevalence rates of potentially traumatic experiences in forensic populations, there is still a lack of evidence supporting the use of suitable assessment tools, especially for young males in custody. For services to identify, support, and offer trauma interventions to this cohort, practitioners require reliable and valid assessment tools. This systematic review (Open Science Framework registration: https://osf.io/r6hbk) identifies those tools able to provide valid, reliable, and comparable data for this cohort. Five electronic databases and gray literature were searched to identify relevant measures. Inclusion criteria: studies of tools to assess for trauma with males aged between 12 and 25 years-old in a custodial setting, any year of publication, and available in English. Exclusion criteria: studies that did not measure psychological trauma or include a standalone trauma scale, or report primary data. A three-step quality assessment method was used to evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of the measures. Fourteen studies were selected for review (which included 12 measures). The studies sampled a total of approximately 1,768 male participants and an age range of 12 to 25 years. The studies reported on various types of psychometric evidence and due to the lack of homogeneity, a narrative synthesis was used to discuss, interpret, and evaluate each measure. The overall quality of the psychometric properties of the measures in this review showed that the currently available instruments for the assessment of trauma with young males in custody is limited but promising.
尽管有大量证据表明,在法医人群中,潜在创伤经历的发生率很高,但仍缺乏支持使用合适评估工具的证据,尤其是针对被拘留的年轻男性。为了让服务部门能够识别、支持和提供创伤干预措施给这一群体,从业者需要可靠和有效的评估工具。本系统评价(在 Open Science Framework 上的注册链接:https://osf.io/r6hbk)确定了那些能够为这一群体提供有效、可靠和可比数据的工具。通过搜索五个电子数据库和灰色文献来确定相关的测量工具。纳入标准:对 12 至 25 岁之间被拘留的男性进行创伤评估的工具研究,任何出版年份,以及英文版本。排除标准:未测量心理创伤或不包括独立的创伤量表,或报告原始数据的研究。采用三步质量评估方法来评估测量工具的方法学质量和心理计量学特性。共有 14 项研究被选入本综述(其中包括 12 项测量工具)。这些研究总共抽取了大约 1768 名男性参与者,年龄在 12 至 25 岁之间。这些研究报告了各种心理计量学证据,由于缺乏同质性,因此采用叙述性综合方法来讨论、解释和评估每个测量工具。本综述中评估年轻男性被拘留者创伤的测量工具的心理计量学特性的整体质量表明,目前用于评估被拘留的年轻男性创伤的工具是有限的,但有希望的。