• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症患者认知电池的开发和评估。

Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive Battery for People With Schizophrenia in Ethiopia.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.

Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jul 27;50(4):931-943. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad178.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbad178
PMID:38159078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11283194/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Cognitive difficulties significantly burdened people with schizophrenia (PWS). However, cognitive assessment is often unavailable in low- and middle-income counties (LMICs) due to a lack of validated and culturally adapted cognitive assessment tools. In this study, we developed and evaluated a culturally sensitive cognitive battery for PWS in Ethiopia.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was conducted in three phases. First, we selected appropriate tests through an instrument selection procedure and created a new battery. Then, we rigorously adapted the tests using culturally competent procedures, including cognitive interviewing and expert meetings. Finally, we tested the new battery in 208 PWS and 208 controls. We evaluated its psychometric properties using advanced statistical techniques, including Item Response Theory (IRT).

STUDY RESULTS

The Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery for Schizophrenia (ECAS) was developed from three different batteries. Participants reported tests were easy to complete, and the raters found them easy to administer. All tests had good inter-rater reliability, and the composite score had very high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). One-factor structure better represented the data with excellent internal consistency (α = .81). ECAS significantly differentiated PWS from controls with 77% sensitivity and 62% specificity at a Z-score ≤0.12 cut-off value. IRT analysis suggested that the battery functions best among moderately impaired participants (difficulty between -0.06 and 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

ECAS is a practical, tolerable, reliable, and valid assessment of cognition. ECAS can supplement current assessment tools in LAMICs for PWS and can be used to measure cognitive intervention outcomes.

摘要

背景与假设

认知障碍给精神分裂症患者(PWS)带来了沉重负担。然而,由于缺乏经过验证和文化适应性的认知评估工具,在中低收入国家(LMICs),认知评估往往无法进行。在这项研究中,我们开发并评估了一种针对埃塞俄比亚 PWS 患者的具有文化敏感性的认知电池。

研究设计

这项研究分为三个阶段进行。首先,我们通过仪器选择程序选择了合适的测试,并创建了一个新的电池。然后,我们使用文化能力程序(包括认知访谈和专家会议)对测试进行了严格的适应性调整。最后,我们在 208 名 PWS 和 208 名对照者中测试了新电池。我们使用包括项目反应理论(IRT)在内的先进统计技术评估了其心理计量学特性。

研究结果

埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估电池(ECAS)是由三个不同的电池发展而来。参与者报告说测试很容易完成,评估者发现测试很容易进行。所有测试的评分者间信度都很好,综合评分的重测信度非常高(ICC=0.91)。单因素结构能更好地表示数据,内部一致性非常好(α=0.81)。ECAS 在 Z 分数≤0.12 截断值时,以 77%的敏感性和 62%的特异性显著区分了 PWS 和对照组。IRT 分析表明,该电池在中度受损参与者(难度在-0.06 和 0.66 之间)中效果最佳。

结论

ECAS 是一种实用、可耐受、可靠且有效的认知评估工具。ECAS 可以补充中低收入国家精神分裂症患者目前的评估工具,也可以用于衡量认知干预的效果。

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive Battery for People With Schizophrenia in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症患者认知电池的开发和评估。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jul 27;50(4):931-943. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad178.
2
Introducing an interview-based cognitive assessment tool for people with Schizophrenia in Ethiopia.介绍一种针对埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症患者的基于访谈的认知评估工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115474. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115474. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
Validation of the Amharic version of Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI-A) in people with schizophrenia in Ethiopia.
Schizophr Res. 2024 Dec;274:441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.019. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the patient-reported experience of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia (PRECIS) scale.精神分裂症患者认知障碍报告体验量表(PRECIS)的心理测量学评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jun 17;8(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00731-x.
5
Design and validation of a brief scale for cognitive evaluation in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (BCog-S).用于评估精神分裂症患者认知功能的简短量表(BCog-S)的设计与验证。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):543-552. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12602. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
The Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS): a validation study.埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估量表(ECAS):一项效度研究。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Apr 6;10(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4.
7
Adaptation and Validation of Version B of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen for the Portuguese Population.《爱丁堡认知与行为性肌萎缩侧索硬化症筛查量表B版在葡萄牙人群中的适应性与验证》
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr 27;40(3):553-564. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae118.
8
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
The Turkish validity and reliability of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III.阿登布鲁克认知功能测试第三版在土耳其的效度和信度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):e13147. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13147.
10
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study.社会认知心理计量学评估:最终验证研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):737-748. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx117.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS): a validation study.埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估量表(ECAS):一项效度研究。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Apr 6;10(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Introducing an interview-based cognitive assessment tool for people with Schizophrenia in Ethiopia.介绍一种针对埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症患者的基于访谈的认知评估工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115474. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115474. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Serbian Version of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scale.《Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scale 斯堪的纳维亚版本的跨文化适应性和验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043699.
3
Cognitive impairment in people with schizophrenia: an umbrella review.精神分裂症患者的认知障碍:伞式综述。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Oct;272(7):1139-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01416-6. Epub 2022 May 28.
4
Subjectively-assessed cognitive impairment and neurocognition associations in schizophrenia inpatients.精神分裂症住院患者主观评估的认知障碍与神经认知的关联
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Oct 2;27:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100218. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures.评估中低收入国家严重精神障碍患者的认知:评估工具的系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;57(3):435-460. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the BACS scale (the brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia) among chronic schizophrenic inpatients.巴克斯认知评定量表(简明精神分裂症认知评定量表)阿拉伯语版的跨文化调适与验证:在慢性精神分裂症住院患者中的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03228-9.
7
Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Populations-Psychosis (NeuroGAP-Psychosis): a case-control study protocol and GWAS in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa and Uganda.非裔人群神经精神遗传学-精神病(NeuroGAP-精神病):在埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚、南非和乌干达开展的病例对照研究方案和全基因组关联研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025469.
8
Digit Symbol Substitution Test: The Case for Sensitivity Over Specificity in Neuropsychological Testing.数字符号替换测验:神经心理学测试中敏感性优于特异性的案例。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct;38(5):513-519. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000941.
9
The Cognitive Screening Scale for Schizophrenia (CSSS). Part 1. Design and structure of the scale.
Psychiatr Pol. 2018 Apr 30;52(2):227-239. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/64831. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.