Suppr超能文献

在新冠疫情后的教育环境中,虚拟客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)教学应取代还是补充面对面教学:对一项创新性全国新冠疫情教学计划的评估

Should Virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Teaching Replace or Complement Face-to-Face Teaching in the Post-COVID-19 Educational Environment: An Evaluation of an Innovative National COVID-19 Teaching Programme.

作者信息

Gamble Charles, Oatham Alice, Parikh Raj

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, GBR.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49708. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49708. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic brought about drastic changes to medical education and examinations, with a shift to online lectures and webinars. Additionally, social restrictions in the United Kingdom (UK) inhibited students' ability to practice for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with their peers. Methods The Virtual OSCE buddy scheme (VOBS) provided a means to practice OSCE skills virtually by linking groups of 2-6 final-year medical students with a junior doctor who had recently passed their exams. Sessions were held virtually, tailored to the needs of each group, in a 3-month period prior to examinations. The scheme ran across two examination periods, 2020/21 and 2021/22, including a total of 13 universities throughout the UK. Results In 2020/21, 96% (n=227) of students described improved confidence in OSCE scenarios. Furthermore, 90% (n=213) reported improvement in communication, 89% (n=211) in diagnosis and clinical reasoning and 86% (n=203) in history-taking skills. Examination and procedural skills proved more challenging to practice virtually, with improvement reported by 31% (n=73) and 15% (n=36) of students, respectively. Ninety-three per cent (n=58) of buddies reported improved lesson planning abilities and 90% (n=57) felt more confident in their teaching. In 2021/22, 90% (n=133) of students felt more prepared for their OSCE. In key skills, improvement was reported by 87% (n=128) in communication, 84% (n=124) in diagnosis and clinical reasoning and 83% (n=123) in history-taking. In this cohort, 40% (n=59) reported improvement in examination skills and 24% (n=36) in procedural skills. Ninety per cent (n=83) of buddies reported an improvement in teaching skills, with 93% (n=85) increasing their confidence to teach. Conclusion VOBS demonstrates the benefits to students and teachers of near-peer OSCE teaching. Given the virtual nature, the main drawback is the inability to practice hands-on examination and procedural skills. This scheme provides insight to educators planning virtual teaching programmes in the future. With the evolution of technology, virtual examination and procedure practice may be possible in the near future. VOBS would suggest that currently, virtual OSCE teaching should be used to complement face-to-face teaching.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情给医学教育和考试带来了巨大变化,转向了在线讲座和网络研讨会。此外,英国的社交限制阻碍了学生与同龄人一起进行客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的练习。方法:虚拟OSCE伙伴计划(VOBS)提供了一种通过将2至6名医学专业最后一年的学生与一名最近通过考试的初级医生组成小组,以虚拟方式练习OSCE技能的方法。在考试前的3个月内,根据每个小组的需求,以虚拟方式进行课程。该计划在2020/21和2021/22两个考试期间实施,涵盖了英国的13所大学。结果:在2020/21年,96%(n=227)的学生表示在OSCE场景中的信心有所提高。此外,90%(n=213)的学生报告沟通能力有所提高,89%(n=211)的学生报告诊断和临床推理能力有所提高,86%(n=203)的学生报告病史采集技能有所提高。实践证明,虚拟练习考试和操作技能更具挑战性,分别有31%(n=73)和15%(n=36)的学生报告有所提高。93%(n=58)的伙伴报告课程规划能力有所提高,90%(n=57)的伙伴对教学更有信心。在2021/22年,90%(n=133)的学生对OSCE准备得更充分。在关键技能方面,87%(n=128)的学生报告沟通能力有所提高,84%(n=124)的学生报告诊断和临床推理能力有所提高,83%(n=123)的学生报告病史采集能力有所提高。在这一组中,40%(n=59)的学生报告考试技能有所提高,24%(n=36)的学生报告操作技能有所提高。90%(n=83)的伙伴报告教学技能有所提高,93%(n=85)的伙伴对教学更有信心。结论:VOBS证明了近同伴OSCE教学对学生和教师的益处。鉴于其虚拟性质,主要缺点是无法进行实际操作考试和操作技能练习。该计划为未来规划虚拟教学计划的教育工作者提供了参考。随着技术的发展,虚拟考试和操作练习在不久的将来可能成为现实。VOBS表明,目前虚拟OSCE教学应用于补充面对面教学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9b7/10757465/4719cc715d6c/cureus-0015-00000049708-i01.jpg

相似文献

2
Assessing the utility of virtual OSCE sessions as an educational tool: a national pilot study.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03248-3.
3
Students' perceptions of a near-peer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in medical imaging.
Radiography (Lond). 2020 Feb;26(1):42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE.
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):932. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036.
9
10
Assessment of Factors That Students Perceive to Affect Their Virtual Learning of Clinical Skills for OSCE.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 7;14:707-712. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S402920. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 11;14:723-739. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S401766. eCollection 2023.
2
Near-Peer-Teaching Revision Series During the COVID-19 Recovery Phase: An Experience From a UK Medical School.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 5;15(3):e35775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35775. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Beyond COVID-19: the impact of recent pandemics on medical students and their education: a scoping review.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2139657. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2139657.
6
Designing and running an online Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on Zoom: A peer-led example.
Med Teach. 2021 Jun;43(6):651-655. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1887836. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
10
A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 2;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1571-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验