Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstraße 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Sociology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02239-7.
Despite general practitioners' (GPs') key role in Germanys primary health care, clinical research in general practice is scarce. Clinical research is mainly conducted at inpatient facilities, although their results are rarely transferable. German GPs have no extra time or funding for research, as well as limited research training. To support clinical research in German primary health care, practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are developed. As they will be based on an active involvement of GPs, we need more information on GPs
participation-readiness. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to participation in the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet) from the GPs`perspective before clinical trials will be performed.
We have performed semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of 20 Bavarian GPs in 2022 under the application of the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Transcriptions were analysed according to Kuckartz` qualitative content analysis. The five domains of the CFIR framework served as initial deductive codes.
N = 14 interviewees already agreed to participate in BayFoNet, whereas n = 6 interviewees opted not to participate in BayFoNet at the time of data collection. Main facilitators to conduct clinical research within BayFoNet were the motivation to contribute to evidence strength and quality in general practice, professional development and training of practice staff, as well as networking. Barriers for an active participation were bad experiences with previous clinical studies and lack of resources.
PBRNS in Germany have to be promoted and the entire practice team has to be involved at an early stage of development. Professional training of general practice staff and a living network might enhance engagement. Participatory approaches could help to develop acceptable and feasible study designs. Furthermore, PBRNs should support patient recruitment and data collection in general practices and disseminate the results of their research projects regularly to maintain GPs` engagement.
DRKS00028805, NCT05667207.
尽管全科医生在德国的初级保健中发挥着关键作用,但全科医学的临床研究却很少。临床研究主要在内科医疗机构进行,尽管其结果很少具有可转移性。德国的全科医生没有额外的时间或资金用于研究,并且研究培训也有限。为了支持德国初级保健中的临床研究,正在开发基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)。由于它们将基于全科医生的积极参与,因此我们需要更多关于全科医生参与准备情况的信息。本研究的目的是在开展临床试验之前,从全科医生的角度探讨参与巴伐利亚研究实践网络(BayFoNet)的促进因素和障碍。
我们于 2022 年使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对 20 名巴伐利亚全科医生进行了半结构化定性访谈,采用了有针对性的样本。根据 Kuckartz 的定性内容分析对转录进行了分析。CFIR 框架的五个领域作为初步的演绎代码。
n = 14 名受访者已同意参与 BayFoNet,而 n = 6 名受访者在数据收集时选择不参与 BayFoNet。在 BayFoNet 中开展临床研究的主要促进因素是为提高一般实践中的证据强度和质量做出贡献的动机、实践员工的专业发展和培训以及网络。积极参与的障碍是以前的临床研究经验不佳和资源匮乏。
德国的 PBRN 必须得到推广,整个实践团队必须在发展的早期阶段参与进来。一般实践员工的专业培训和活跃的网络可能会增强参与度。参与式方法可以帮助制定可接受和可行的研究设计。此外,PBRN 应支持在一般实践中招募患者和收集数据,并定期传播其研究项目的结果,以保持全科医生的参与度。
DRKS00028805,NCT05667207。