Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Prev Sci. 2024 Jul;25(Suppl 3):486-496. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01626-x. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
Systemic racism is pervasive in US society and disproportionately limits opportunities for education, work, and health for historically marginalized and minoritized racial and ethnic groups, making it an urgent issue of social justice. Because systemic racism is a social determinant of health prevalent across multiple social and institutional structures, it requires multilevel intervention approaches using effective designs and analytic methods to measure and evaluate outcomes. Racism is a fundamental cause of poor health outcomes, including mental health outcomes; thus, mental health services and programs that address racism and discrimination are key to promoting positive mental health of racial and ethnic minority youth. While multilevel interventions are well-suited for improving outcomes like youth mental health disparities, their evaluation poses unique methodological challenges, requiring specialized design and analytic approaches. There has been limited methodological guidance provided to researchers on how to test multilevel interventions using approaches that balance methodological rigor, practicality, and acceptability across stakeholder groups, especially within communities most affected by systemic racism. This paper addresses this gap by providing an example of how to rigorously evaluate a hypothetical, theoretically based, multilevel intervention promoting mental health equity in three US school systems using an anti-racist approach intervening at the macro- (i.e., school system), meso- (i.e., school), and micro- (i.e., family and student) levels to improve mental health in adolescents. We describe the design, sample size considerations, and analytic methods to comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness while exploring the extent to which the components interact synergistically to improve outcomes. The methodological approach proposed can be adapted to other multilevel interventions that include strategies addressing macro-, meso-, and micro-levels of influence.
系统性种族主义在美国社会普遍存在,不成比例地限制了历史上被边缘化和少数族裔群体在教育、工作和健康方面的机会,使其成为社会正义的紧迫问题。由于系统性种族主义是普遍存在于多个社会和制度结构中的健康的社会决定因素,因此需要采用多层次干预方法,使用有效的设计和分析方法来衡量和评估结果。种族主义是造成健康结果不佳的根本原因,包括心理健康结果;因此,解决种族主义和歧视问题的心理健康服务和计划是促进少数族裔青年心理健康的关键。虽然多层次干预非常适合改善青年心理健康差距等结果,但它们的评估提出了独特的方法学挑战,需要专门的设计和分析方法。对于研究人员来说,如何使用平衡方法严谨性、实用性和利益相关者群体(尤其是受系统性种族主义影响最大的社区)可接受性的方法来测试多层次干预措施,几乎没有提供方法学指导。本文通过提供一个示例来解决这一差距,该示例说明了如何使用反种族主义方法在三个美国学校系统中严格评估一个假设的、基于理论的、多层次干预措施,以促进青少年心理健康公平。我们描述了设计、样本量考虑因素和分析方法,以全面评估其有效性,同时探索各个组成部分协同作用以改善结果的程度。所提出的方法学方法可以适应其他包括解决宏观、中观和微观层面影响的策略的多层次干预措施。