• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FLEX 评分的开发与多中心验证:基于注意力的 ICD-10 和当前操作术语集嵌入的个性化术前手术风险预测。

Development and multicentre validation of the FLEX score: personalised preoperative surgical risk prediction using attention-based ICD-10 and Current Procedural Terminology set embeddings.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;132(3):607-615. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.039. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.039
PMID:38184474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative knowledge of surgical risks can improve perioperative care and patient outcomes. However, assessments requiring clinician examination of patients or manual chart review can be too burdensome for routine use.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of 243 479 adult noncardiac surgical patients at four hospitals within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) system in the USA. We developed a machine learning method using routinely collected coding and patient characteristics data from the electronic health record which predicts 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, discharge to long-term care, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Our method, the Flexible Surgical Set Embedding (FLEX) score, achieved state-of-the-art performance to identify comorbidities that significantly contribute to the risk of each adverse outcome. The contributions of comorbidities are weighted based on patient-specific context, yielding personalised risk predictions. Understanding the significant drivers of risk of adverse outcomes for each patient can inform clinicians of potential targets for intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

FLEX utilises information from a wider range of medical diagnostic and procedural codes than previously possible and can adapt to different coding practices to accurately predict adverse postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

术前了解手术风险可以改善围手术期护理和患者预后。然而,需要临床医生检查患者或手动病历审查的评估对于常规使用来说过于繁琐。

方法

我们在美国 MGB 系统的 4 家医院对 243479 名成年非心脏手术患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。我们使用电子病历中常规收集的编码和患者特征数据开发了一种机器学习方法,该方法可预测 30 天死亡率、30 天再入院率、长期护理出院和住院时间。

结果

我们的方法,即灵活手术集嵌入(FLEX)评分,在识别对每种不良结局风险有显著贡献的合并症方面达到了最新水平。合并症的贡献基于患者特定的背景进行加权,从而产生个性化的风险预测。了解每个患者不良结局风险的主要驱动因素可以为临床医生提供潜在的干预目标。

结论

FLEX 利用了比以往更广泛的医疗诊断和手术代码信息,并且可以适应不同的编码实践,从而准确预测术后不良结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/e291fdaef87f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/0abffd9570f2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/a416b75dbb94/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/e291fdaef87f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/0abffd9570f2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/a416b75dbb94/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ae/10870132/e291fdaef87f/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and multicentre validation of the FLEX score: personalised preoperative surgical risk prediction using attention-based ICD-10 and Current Procedural Terminology set embeddings.FLEX 评分的开发与多中心验证:基于注意力的 ICD-10 和当前操作术语集嵌入的个性化术前手术风险预测。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;132(3):607-615. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.11.039. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Development and prospective validation of postoperative pain prediction from preoperative EHR data using attention-based set embeddings.基于注意力的集合嵌入从术前电子健康记录数据预测术后疼痛的模型开发与前瞻性验证
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 16;6(1):209. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00947-z.
3
Machine Learning Prediction of Postoperative Emergency Department Hospital Readmission.机器学习预测术后急诊再次住院。
Anesthesiology. 2020 May;132(5):968-980. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003140.
4
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
What Factors Predict Adverse Discharge Disposition in Patients Older Than 60 Years Undergoing Lower-extremity Surgery? The Adverse Discharge in Older Patients after Lower-extremity Surgery (ADELES) Risk Score.哪些因素可预测行下肢手术的 60 岁以上患者出院时的不良转归?下肢手术后老年患者不良转归(ADELES)风险评分。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):546-547. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001532.
6
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.脊柱肿瘤手术后30天再入院及再次手术:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16168.
7
Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.联合现行操作术语和国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正码算法在分类退行性改变的颈椎手术中的应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 15;36(22):1843-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f7a943.
8
Classification of Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Electronic Health Record Data Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对电子健康记录数据中的当前操作术语代码进行分类。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):738-749. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003150.
9
Developing a Machine Learning Model for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Study.开发用于预测非心脏手术患者30天主要不良心脑血管事件的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 9;27:e66366. doi: 10.2196/66366.
10
Mining high-dimensional administrative claims data to predict early hospital readmissions.利用高维行政索赔数据预测早期住院再入院。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):272-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002151. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of peripheral nerve blocks with increased postoperative pain and opioid use in orthopaedic surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.骨科手术中周围神经阻滞与术后疼痛加剧及阿片类药物使用增加的关联:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.030.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and prospective validation of postoperative pain prediction from preoperative EHR data using attention-based set embeddings.基于注意力的集合嵌入从术前电子健康记录数据预测术后疼痛的模型开发与前瞻性验证
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 16;6(1):209. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00947-z.
2
Comparing the predictive accuracy of frailty instruments applied to preoperative electronic health data for adults undergoing noncardiac surgery.比较应用于接受非心脏手术的成年人术前电子健康数据的虚弱工具的预测准确性。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;129(4):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
3
Validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in older patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery.
验证 ACS NSQIP 手术风险计算器在接受择期手术的老年结直肠癌患者中的应用。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Comparison of Electronic Frailty Metrics for Prediction of Adverse Outcomes of Abdominal Surgery.电子脆弱指标在预测腹部手术不良结局中的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):e220172. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0172. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Frailty-aware care: giving value to frailty assessment across different healthcare settings.衰弱感知护理:在不同医疗保健环境中重视衰弱评估。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02722-9.
6
Risk factors and associated outcomes of hospital readmission in COPD: A systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者住院再入院的风险因素及相关结局:系统评价。
Respir Med. 2020 Nov;173:105988. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105988. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Frailty and long-term postoperative disability trajectories: a prospective multicentre cohort study.虚弱与长期术后残疾轨迹:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):704-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Age of patients undergoing surgery.患者手术时的年龄。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):1012-1018. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11148. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
Validation of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator for preoperative risk stratification.美国外科医师学会术前风险分层风险计算器的验证
Heart Asia. 2018 May 17;10(2):e010993. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2017-010993. eCollection 2018.
10
Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study.开发和验证一个专注于急性护理环境中老年人的医院衰弱风险评分,使用电子医院记录:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30668-8. Epub 2018 Apr 26.