Nijenhuis Sebastiaan B, Koopmann Till, Mulder Jesper, Elferink-Gemser Marije T, Faber Irene R
Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Institute of Sport Science, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sports Med Open. 2024 Jan 7;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00669-2.
Better methods to support talent identification and development processes may contribute to more effective and efficient athlete development programs in racket sports. Both researchers and practitioners recommend multidimensional and longitudinal approaches to better understand the nature of talent (development). However, the added value of these 'innovative' approaches has not yet been clarified for racket sports. This systematic review intends to gain further insight into the outcomes of multidimensional and longitudinal approaches for talent identification and development in racket sports and to provide directions for future talent research.
Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science (January 2000-August 2022). Search terms covered the areas of racket sports and talent in sports. Studies using multidimensional and/or longitudinal talent approaches were included and analyzed regarding the methodology, included performance characteristics (i.e., anthropometrical, physiological, technical, tactical, psychological), and study findings.
A total of thirty-two studies were included using multidimensional (n = 15), unidimensional longitudinal (n = 3) or multidimensional longitudinal designs (n = 14). Most research covered physiological characteristics (n = 28), while fewer articles investigated anthropometrics (n = 21) and technical characteristics (n = 16). Only limited research investigated psychological (n = 4) and tactical characteristics (n = 1). Almost all studies measured physiological characteristics in combination with other characteristics. There was moderate to strong evidence that physiological and technical characteristics have value for athlete development programs in racket sports. Positive but limited evidence was found for psychological and tactical characteristics. Anthropometrical assessments were generally used as controlling variables for maturation. Study designs varied, and many studies used unidimensional statistical models and analyses within multidimensional study designs and datasets.
This review provides an overview of talent research using multidimensional and/or longitudinal approaches within racket sports and gives guidance on what characteristics to include in decision-making and monitoring processes. However, it remains difficult to draw conclusions about the added values of these approaches due to their variety in methodology. Future talent research should include more consistent study designs and conduct multidimensional and longitudinal studies using multivariate statistical approaches that benefit from the data's multidimensionality.
支持人才识别与发展过程的更好方法可能有助于网球运动中更有效且高效的运动员发展计划。研究人员和从业者都推荐采用多维和纵向的方法,以便更好地理解人才(发展)的本质。然而,对于网球运动而言,这些“创新”方法的附加值尚未得到明确。本系统综述旨在进一步深入了解多维和纵向方法在网球运动人才识别与发展方面的成果,并为未来的人才研究提供方向。
于2000年1月至2022年8月期间在PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和科学网进行电子检索。检索词涵盖网球运动和体育人才领域。纳入使用多维和/或纵向人才方法的研究,并就其方法、所包含的表现特征(即人体测量学、生理学、技术、战术、心理)以及研究结果进行分析。
共纳入32项研究,采用多维设计的有15项、单维纵向设计的有3项、多维纵向设计的有14项。大多数研究涵盖生理特征(28项),而研究人体测量学(21项)和技术特征(16项)的文章较少。仅有有限的研究调查了心理特征(4项)和战术特征(1项)。几乎所有研究都将生理特征与其他特征结合进行测量。有中等至充分的证据表明,生理和技术特征对网球运动的运动员发展计划具有价值。心理和战术特征方面有积极但有限的证据。人体测量评估通常用作成熟度的控制变量。研究设计各不相同,许多研究在多维研究设计和数据集中使用单维统计模型和分析。
本综述概述了网球运动中使用多维和/或纵向方法的人才研究,并就决策和监测过程中应纳入哪些特征提供了指导。然而,由于这些方法在方法论上的多样性,仍然难以得出关于其附加值的结论。未来的人才研究应采用更一致的研究设计,并使用受益于数据多维性的多变量统计方法进行多维和纵向研究。