• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活方式干预后挪威健康生活中心的体力活动和久坐时间。

Physical activity and sedentary time after lifestyle interventions at the Norwegian Healthy Life Centres.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Faculty of Health, VID Specialized University, Norway.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Jan 8;25:e4. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000658.

DOI:10.1017/S1463423623000658
PMID:38186355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10790714/
Abstract

AIMS

This study evaluates long-term changes in physical activity and its associations with various predictors after a behavior change program at the Norwegian Healthy Life Centers.

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is recommended and is part of public health strategies to prevent noncommunicable diseases.

METHODS

This longitudinal cohort, based on a controlled randomized trial, studies a population of 116 Healthy Life Center participants in South-Western Norway who wore SenseWear Armbands to measure time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time based on metabolic equivalents. The measurements were obtained at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 24 months after baseline. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to assess predictors for change in physical activity and sedentary time.

FINDINGS

High physical activity levels at baseline were maintained during the 24-month study period. Young, male participants with good self-rated health, utilizing local PA facilities were most active, and young participants utilizing local facilities were also less sedentary. The participants with higher levels of education were less active initially but caught up with the difference during follow-up. A high degree of controlled regulation, characterized by bad conscience and external pressure, predicted more sedentary behavior and a trend toward being less physically active. Autonomous motivation was associated with less time spent on sedentary behaviors. People with high self-efficacy for physical activity were more sedentary initially but showed a reduction in their sedentary behavior.The study supports the importance of attending local training facilities and adopting motivation for behavioral change that is not based on guilt and external rewards. Interventions aimed at improving physical activity among people at risk for noncommunicable diseases benefit from habitual use of local training facilities, strengthening their self-perceived health and the development of internalized motivation. However, it has not been shown to mitigate social health disparities.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了挪威健康生活中心行为改变计划后,体力活动的长期变化及其与各种预测因素的关系。

背景

体力活动是预防非传染性疾病的推荐内容,也是公共卫生策略的一部分。

方法

本纵向队列研究基于一项对照随机试验,研究了挪威西南部 116 名健康生活中心参与者的人群,他们佩戴 SenseWear 臂带,根据代谢当量测量中度到剧烈体力活动和久坐时间。测量结果在基线、干预后即刻和基线后 24 个月获得。线性混合模型分析用于评估体力活动和久坐时间变化的预测因素。

结果

高基线体力活动水平在 24 个月的研究期间得以维持。年轻、男性、自我报告健康状况良好、利用当地 PA 设施的参与者最为活跃,年轻参与者利用当地设施也较少久坐。教育程度较高的参与者最初活动水平较低,但在随访期间赶上了差距。高度的控制调节,表现为内疚感和外部压力,预测了更多的久坐行为和体力活动减少的趋势。自主动机与较少的久坐行为有关。最初体力活动自我效能感较高的人久坐时间较多,但随后减少了久坐行为。该研究支持关注当地培训设施和采用基于内疚感和外部奖励的行为改变动机的重要性。针对非传染性疾病高危人群的提高体力活动的干预措施受益于习惯性使用当地培训设施,增强了他们的自我感知健康和内在动机的发展。然而,它并没有显示出减轻社会健康差距的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/3219c3f5b500/S1463423623000658_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/156622afc242/S1463423623000658_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/392c06684d79/S1463423623000658_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/3219c3f5b500/S1463423623000658_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/156622afc242/S1463423623000658_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/392c06684d79/S1463423623000658_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/937a/10790714/3219c3f5b500/S1463423623000658_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical activity and sedentary time after lifestyle interventions at the Norwegian Healthy Life Centres.生活方式干预后挪威健康生活中心的体力活动和久坐时间。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Jan 8;25:e4. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000658.
2
The Norwegian Healthy Life Centre Study: A pragmatic RCT of physical activity in primary care.挪威健康生活中心研究:初级保健中体力活动的实用随机对照试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Feb;47(1):18-27. doi: 10.1177/1403494818785260. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Study protocol of European Fans in Training (EuroFIT): a four-country randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle program for men delivered in elite football clubs.欧洲球迷参与训练(EuroFIT)研究方案:一项在精英足球俱乐部中针对男性开展的生活方式项目的四国随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 19;16:598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3255-y.
4
Participants at Norwegian Healthy Life Centres: Who are they, why do they attend and how are they motivated? A cross-sectional study.挪威健康生活中心的参与者:他们是谁,为什么参加以及他们的动机是什么?一项横断面研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Nov;46(7):774-781. doi: 10.1177/1403494818756081. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐时间的行为改变干预措施:一项随机对照试验的方案。
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):182. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
Possible Impact of a 12-Month Web- and Smartphone-Based Program to Improve Long-term Physical Activity in Patients Attending Spa Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络和智能手机的 12 个月项目对改善接受水疗患者长期身体活动的可能影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 16;24(6):e29640. doi: 10.2196/29640.
7
Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active.降低心血管疾病风险因素:“积极项目”的6个月结果
Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26(6):883-92. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0218.
8
Active play in ASP -a matched-pair cluster-randomized trial investigating the effectiveness of an intervention in after-school programs for supporting children's physical activity.主动游戏在 ASP 中的应用 - 一项匹配对群组随机试验,旨在调查一项干预措施在课后项目中支持儿童身体活动的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08645-1.
9
The effect of a programme to improve men's sedentary time and physical activity: The European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) randomised controlled trial.一项旨在减少男性久坐时间和增加身体活动的方案的效果:欧洲球迷健身计划(EuroFIT)随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Feb 5;16(2):e1002736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002736. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Effect of a Behavioral Intervention Strategy on Sustained Change in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The IDES_2 Randomized Clinical Trial.行为干预策略对 2 型糖尿病患者体力活动和久坐行为持续改变的影响:IDES_2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):880-890. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0922.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationships between emerging adults self-efficacy and motivation levels and physical activity: a cross-sectional study based on the self-determination theory.新兴成年人的自我效能感、动机水平与体育活动之间的关系:一项基于自我决定理论的横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 29;15:1342611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342611. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years' of Healthy Life Centers - research and directions for future work.十年健康生活中心——研究与未来工作方向
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):1034-1038. doi: 10.1177/14034948221081640. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
The effects of long-term physical activity interventions in communities: Scoping review in the Nordic countries.社区中长期体力活动干预的效果:北欧国家的范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):272-286. doi: 10.1177/14034948211020599. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
How are body mass and body attitude impacted by a behaviour change intervention in primary care? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
行为改变干预对初级保健中体重和身体姿态的影响如何?一项实用随机对照试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):393-401. doi: 10.1177/1403494820939027. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Health-related quality of life and physical activity level after a behavior change program at Norwegian healthy life centers: a 15-month follow-up.挪威健康生活中心行为改变项目后与健康相关的生活质量和身体活动水平:15 个月随访。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3031-3041. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02554-x. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis.加速度计测量的体力活动和久坐时间与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系:系统评价和协调荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Aug 21;366:l4570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4570.
6
Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.可穿戴身体活动监测设备结合运动处方或建议在心脏康复维持阶段的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul 30;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s13102-019-0126-8. eCollection 2019.
7
The Norwegian Healthy Life Centre Study: A pragmatic RCT of physical activity in primary care.挪威健康生活中心研究:初级保健中体力活动的实用随机对照试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Feb;47(1):18-27. doi: 10.1177/1403494818785260. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
Are Differences in Physical Activity across Socioeconomic Groups Associated with Choice of Physical Activity Variables to Report?不同社会经济群体的体力活动差异是否与报告体力活动变量的选择有关?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 5;15(5):922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050922.
9
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.久坐行为与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率以及 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Complex systems and individual-level approaches to population health: a false dichotomy?复杂系统与个体层面的人群健康方法:一种错误的二分法?
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep;2(9):e396-e397. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30167-6. Epub 2017 Sep 5.