Rampersad Nishanee, Gcabashe Nonkululeko, Chetty Darshan, Dubazane Fanelesibonge Sinamile, Lafitte Catherine, Ndwandwe Zothile, Rauff Faatima Zahra, Sibiya Phumzile, Tembe Andile
Discipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Jan 3;15:15-24. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S436118. eCollection 2024.
Although research on teaching style preferences is available in the literature, there is limited information on the preferences of optometry teachers. The Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has impacted educational practices in all sectors. This study focuses on the teaching style preferences and online teaching practices of optometry teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study used a case study research design and a self-administered online questionnaire and follow-up semi-structured interview for data collection. The Grasha-Riechmann teaching style inventory was used to explore the teaching style preferences (Expert, Formal Authority, Demonstrator, Facilitator and Delegator). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis respectively.
The optometry teachers were aged between 29 and 51 years (median = 45 years) and had between 3 and 25 years of teaching experience (median = 5 years). All teachers scored high in the Expert teaching style and most had scores categorized as high for the Delegator, Facilitator and Formal Authority teaching styles. The teachers reported that the initial adaptation to online teaching was difficult and challenging as they were not prepared for the rapid transition to online learning. They used various resources and materials but felt that student participation and engagement was lower in online teaching. Teachers noted that more time was needed to prepare materials for online teaching than for face-to-face teaching.
Optometry teachers adopted a multidimensional approach preferring the different teaching styles to varying degrees. Teachers noted challenges with the initial transition and adaptation to online teaching and used a combination of resources to support student learning.
尽管文献中有关于教学风格偏好的研究,但验光教师的偏好信息有限。2019年冠状病毒病大流行对所有领域的教育实践都产生了影响。本研究聚焦于COVID-19大流行期间验光教师的教学风格偏好和在线教学实践。
本研究采用案例研究设计,通过自行填写的在线问卷和后续的半结构化访谈收集数据。使用格拉沙-里希曼教学风格量表来探究教学风格偏好(专家型、正式权威型、示范型、促进型和授权型)。分别使用描述性统计和主题内容分析法对定量和定性数据进行分析。
验光教师年龄在29岁至51岁之间(中位数 = 45岁),教学经验在3年至25年之间(中位数 = 5年)。所有教师在专家型教学风格上得分较高,大多数教师在授权型、促进型和正式权威型教学风格上的得分也被归类为高。教师们表示,由于没有为快速过渡到在线学习做好准备,最初适应在线教学既困难又具有挑战性。他们使用了各种资源和材料,但觉得在线教学中学生的参与度较低。教师们指出,为在线教学准备材料比面对面教学需要更多时间。
验光教师采用了多维方法,在不同程度上偏好不同的教学风格。教师们指出了最初过渡和适应在线教学时面临的挑战,并使用多种资源组合来支持学生学习。