• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬对多囊卵巢综合征女性诱导排卵的疗效比较

Efficacy of Letrozole vs Clomiphene Citrate for induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

作者信息

Wasim Tayyiba, Nasrin Tahira, Zunair Javeria, Irshad Sonia

机构信息

Tayyiba Wasim, FCPS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

Tahira Nasrin, FCPS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):78-83. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7971.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.1.7971
PMID:38196458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772410/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of letrozole vs Clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in PCOS women.

METHODS

This double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, from January 2016 to December 2020. Total 220 patients, diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria were randomly assigned into two groups after taking informed consent. The women were followed for ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates in the next five consecutive menstrual cycles with either clomiphene citrate or letrozole.

RESULTS

Letrozole had significantly better pregnancy rate (29.0% vs 15.4% p-value 0.015), monofollicular development (77.2% vs 52.7% p-value 0.000) and live birth rate (25.4% vs 10.9% p-value 0.005) as compared to clomiphene citrate. There was no difference between the two groups in ovulation rate (68.1% vs 63.6%, p-value 0.477), early pregnancy loss (3.6% vs 4.5% p-value 0.734), and twin pregnancy (0.0% vs 1.81% p-value 0.155). There was no ectopic pregnancy and no congenital anomalies in both groups. Hot flushes were higher in clomiphene group (31.8% vs 12.7% p-value 0.001) while fatigue (30.9% vs 8.1% p-value 0.000) and dizziness (21.8% vs 10.0% p-value 0.029) was higher with letrozole but these were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Letrozole is better treatment choice than clomiphene citrate in PCOS women with infertility in terms of pregnancy and live birth rate. NCT05702957.

摘要

目的

比较来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性促排卵的疗效。

方法

本双盲随机对照试验于2016年1月至2020年12月在拉合尔服务医院进行。根据鹿特丹标准诊断为PCOS的220例患者在获得知情同意后被随机分为两组。这些女性在接下来连续五个月经周期中接受枸橼酸氯米芬或来曲唑治疗,并随访排卵、妊娠和活产率。

结果

与枸橼酸氯米芬相比,来曲唑的妊娠率(29.0%对15.4%,p值0.015)、单卵泡发育率(77.2%对52.7%,p值0.000)和活产率(25.4%对10.9%,p值0.005)显著更高。两组的排卵率(68.1%对63.6%,p值0.477)、早期妊娠丢失率(3.6%对4.5%,p值0.734)和双胎妊娠率(0.0%对1.81%,p值0.155)无差异。两组均无宫外孕和先天性异常。枸橼酸氯米芬组潮热发生率更高(31.8%对12.7%,p值0.001),而来曲唑组疲劳(30.9%对8.1%,p值0.000)和头晕(21.8%对10.0%,p值0.029)发生率更高,但这些症状耐受性良好。

结论

就妊娠率和活产率而言,来曲唑是治疗PCOS不孕女性比枸橼酸氯米芬更好的选择。NCT05702957。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b21/10772410/838c06597d17/PJMS-40-78-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b21/10772410/838c06597d17/PJMS-40-78-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b21/10772410/838c06597d17/PJMS-40-78-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Letrozole vs Clomiphene Citrate for induction of ovulation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬对多囊卵巢综合征女性诱导排卵的疗效比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(1Part-I):78-83. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.1.7971.
2
Double-blind randomized controlled trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征不孕患者的双盲随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1631-1638. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex227.
3
Aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.用于多囊卵巢综合征不孕女性的芳香化酶抑制剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 24(2):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub2.
4
Emulating a target trial of the comparative effectiveness of clomiphene citrate and letrozole for ovulation induction.模拟枸橼酸氯米酚和来曲唑用于诱导排卵的比较有效性的目标试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr 1;37(4):793-805. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac005.
5
Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome.来曲唑与氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征不孕的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):119-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313517.
6
Comparing efficacy and safety of stair step protocols for clomiphene citrate and letrozole in ovulation induction for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a randomized controlled clinical trial.比较阶梯方案氯米酚和来曲唑诱导多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女排卵的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Med Life. 2023 May;16(5):725-730. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0069.
7
Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.芳香化酶抑制剂(来曲唑)用于多囊卵巢综合征的不孕女性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 24;5(5):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub3.
8
Letrozole versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征排卵障碍性不孕的随机对照研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):345-350. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13375. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Letrozole Compared With Clomiphene Citrate for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;141(3):523-534. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005070. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.用于多囊卵巢综合征女性促排卵的促性腺激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 16;1(1):CD010290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010290.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Hypothalamic Nuclei Implicated in the Regulation of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Review of Its Clinical, Metabolic, and Endocrine Aspects.参与多囊卵巢综合征调节的下丘脑核团:临床、代谢及内分泌方面的综述
Molecules. 2025 Aug 18;30(16):3407. doi: 10.3390/molecules30163407.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate on ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬对多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵的疗效比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 May-Jun;38(5):1155-1158. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.5565.
2
Polycystic ovarian syndrome and infertility: overview and insights of the putative treatments.多囊卵巢综合征与不孕:治疗方法概述与见解。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021 Oct;37(10):869-874. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1958310. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Letrozole is superior to clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
来曲唑在多囊卵巢综合征患者的促排卵治疗中优于枸橼酸氯米芬。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1460-1465. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3345.
4
Letrozole versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗多囊卵巢综合征排卵障碍性不孕的随机对照研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):345-350. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13375. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Comparing the effect of clomiphene citrate and letrozole on ovulation induction in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.比较枸橼酸氯米芬和来曲唑对多囊卵巢综合征不孕女性促排卵的效果。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):268-271. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.267607.
6
Fertility Treatment Options for Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征女性的生育治疗选择
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 27;13:1179558119890867. doi: 10.1177/1179558119890867. eCollection 2019.
7
First-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome: an individual participant data meta-analysis.一线诱导排卵治疗多囊卵巢综合征:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Nov 5;25(6):717-732. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz029.
8
Evaluation of clinical manifestations, health risks, and quality of life among women with polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征女性的临床表现、健康风险和生活质量评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223329. eCollection 2019.
9
Evidence summaries and recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: assessment and treatment of infertility.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理国际循证指南:不孕症评估与治疗的证据总结及建议
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Jan 4;2019(1):hoy021. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy021. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes and the incidence of fetal congenital abnormalities in infertile women treated with letrozole and clomiphene citrate.来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬治疗不孕女性的妊娠结局及胎儿先天性异常发生率比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Jun;44(6):1036-1041. doi: 10.1111/jog.13644.