• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调整预先护理计划以满足老年人的需求:来自焦点小组和访谈的结果。

Adjusting advance care planning to older people's needs: results from focus groups and interviews.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10491-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10491-x
PMID:38200528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10782636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is becoming increasingly important in medical care. Some suggest standardized approaches to initiate ACP with all older adults. However, the idea of patient-centered care suggests more nuanced approaches tailored to individual older adults' needs. This study investigated how older adults with different views and needs about ACP can be approached in an adequate and most beneficial way by health care professionals.

METHODS

We used questionnaires, interviews, focus groups and informal conversations with older adults, living in their own homes, who volunteered to take part in our research. The research was participatory as we collaborated closely with practice partners and we used the obtained findings immediately and continuously to inform the next steps of our research throughout the process.

RESULTS

We identified three subgroups of older adults with differential needs regarding ACP-related activities: The first group avoids talking about their needs and wishes for care towards the end of life. These older people benefit from activities, which aim at motivating them to concern themselves with ACP-related topics. The second group consists of older adults who are in principle open for ACP-conversations but do not initiate these themselves. This group either trusts their next-of-kin or their healthcare professional to act in accordance with their wishes or does not bring up the topic in order to avoid confronting relevant others with possibly unpleasant topics. This group of people benefits from information about ACP and from healthcare professionals initiating the ACP process. The third group of older people initiates the ACP process themselves, gathers information, and takes the necessary steps for ACP. With this group it remains relevant to check carefully whether they have indeed taken all relevant steps and shared the information with all relevant involved care institutions and relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a model to simplify adjustments of ACP to individuals' needs. Our suggested approach might contribute to increasing the motivation of older people to engage in ACP conversations if these are more closely related to their own needs. Further, it might also contribute to simplifying the individual shaping of the ACP process for healthcare professionals as our suggested model offers clear guidance for approaching different types of older people in different ways. The suggested approach may in future be used for training health care professionals in the conduct of ACP conversations.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)在医疗保健中变得越来越重要。有人建议对所有老年人采用标准化方法启动 ACP。然而,以患者为中心的护理理念表明,需要针对个体老年人的需求采用更细致的方法。本研究探讨了如何以适当和最有益的方式为具有不同 ACP 观点和需求的老年人提供医疗保健专业人员的服务。

方法

我们使用问卷、访谈、焦点小组和与自愿参与我们研究的、居住在自己家中的老年人进行的非正式对话收集数据。本研究是参与式的,因为我们与实践伙伴密切合作,并且在整个过程中,我们立即并持续地使用所获得的研究结果为下一步研究提供信息。

结果

我们确定了具有不同 ACP 相关活动需求的三组老年人:第一组老年人避免谈论他们在生命末期的护理需求和意愿。这些老年人从旨在激励他们关注 ACP 相关话题的活动中受益。第二组老年人原则上对 ACP 对话持开放态度,但不主动发起这些对话。这组人要么信任他们的近亲或医疗保健专业人员会按照他们的意愿行事,要么避免提出这个话题,以免与相关人员讨论可能令人不快的话题。这组人受益于有关 ACP 的信息和医疗保健专业人员启动 ACP 流程。第三组老年人主动启动 ACP 流程,收集信息,并为 ACP 采取必要的步骤。对于这组人,仍然需要仔细检查他们是否确实采取了所有相关步骤,并与所有相关的护理机构和亲属分享了信息。

结论

我们提出了一个简化 ACP 以适应个人需求的模型。如果 ACP 对话更紧密地与老年人的自身需求相关,我们建议的方法可能有助于提高老年人参与 ACP 对话的积极性。此外,这也可能有助于简化医疗保健专业人员对 ACP 流程的个性化塑造,因为我们建议的模型为以不同方式接近不同类型的老年人提供了明确的指导。在未来,该方法可用于培训医疗保健专业人员进行 ACP 对话。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6637/10782636/dadd5b824f7e/12913_2023_10491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6637/10782636/dadd5b824f7e/12913_2023_10491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6637/10782636/dadd5b824f7e/12913_2023_10491_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adjusting advance care planning to older people's needs: results from focus groups and interviews.调整预先护理计划以满足老年人的需求:来自焦点小组和访谈的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10491-x.
2
Advance care planning with older Norwegian adults in their homes: a narrative ethnographic study.在挪威老年人的家中进行预先护理计划:一项叙述性民族志研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 19;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01378-7.
3
Finding the balance between person-centred and treatment-centred discussions in advance care planning-a qualitative analysis of conversations within the MUTUAL (Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations) intervention using a narrative analysis.在预先医疗规划中寻找以患者为中心和以治疗为中心的讨论之间的平衡——使用叙述分析对 MUTUAL(多学科及时开展预先医疗规划对话)干预措施中的对话进行的定性分析。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae020.
4
Significance of advance care planning in nursing homes: views from patients with cognitive impairment, their next of kin, health personnel, and managers.养老院中预先护理计划的意义:认知障碍患者、其近亲属、卫生人员和管理人员的观点。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 May 29;14:997-1005. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S203298. eCollection 2019.
5
Lay Patient Navigators' Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer.非专业患者导航员对与老年癌症患者展开预先护理计划对话中的障碍、促进因素及培训需求的看法
J Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;33(2):70-78. doi: 10.1177/0825859718757131. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Advance care planning in the palliative phase of people with intellectual disabilities: analysis of medical files and interviews.智力残疾患者临终关怀阶段的预先医疗指示计划:病历分析和访谈。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Oct;63(10):1262-1272. doi: 10.1111/jir.12664. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
Trained facilitators' experiences with structured advance care planning conversations in oncology: an international focus group study within the ACTION trial.训练有素的促进者在肿瘤学中进行结构化的预先医疗照护计划谈话的经验:ACTION 试验中的一项国际焦点小组研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 31;19(1):1026. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6170-7.
8
"I just think that we should be informed" a qualitative study of family involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.“我只是认为我们应该被告知”:一项关于养老院中家庭参与预先护理计划的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0156-7.
9
Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study.在胸科住院病房引入预先医疗照护计划的可行性和可接受性:一项探索性混合方法研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485.
10
Experiences with approaches to advance care planning with older people: a qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners.与老年人进行预先医疗护理计划的方法的经验:荷兰全科医生中的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e024762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024762.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance Care Planning in German General Practice: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study on Patients' Expectations and Experiences.德国全科医疗中的预立医疗照护规划:一项关于患者期望与体验的纵向定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70392. doi: 10.1111/hex.70392.
2
Participation in Advance Care Planning Among Medically At-Risk Rural Veterans: Protocol for a Personalized Engagement Model.医疗风险较高的农村退伍军人参与预先护理计划:个性化参与模式方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 12;13:e55080. doi: 10.2196/55080.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences with approaches to advance care planning with older people: a qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners.与老年人进行预先医疗护理计划的方法的经验:荷兰全科医生中的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e024762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024762.
2
Culture and Palliative Care: Preferences, Communication, Meaning, and Mutual Decision Making.文化与姑息治疗:偏好、沟通、意义和共同决策。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 May;55(5):1408-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.
预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
4
Social participation among older adults (55+): Results of a survey in the region of South Limburg in the Netherlands.55岁及以上老年人的社会参与情况:荷兰南林堡地区的一项调查结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e85-e93. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12480. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
5
Palliative care from diagnosis to death.从诊断到死亡的姑息治疗。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 27;356:j878. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j878.
6
Associations Between Personality and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among Men With Prostate Cancer: A Clustering Approach.前列腺癌男性患者的人格与临终关怀偏好之间的关联:一种聚类分析方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
End-of-life care communications and shared decision-making in Norwegian nursing homes--experiences and perspectives of patients and relatives.挪威养老院中的临终关怀沟通与共同决策——患者及亲属的经历与观点
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Aug 19;15:103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0096-y.
8
The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review.预先护理计划对临终关怀的影响:一项系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;28(8):1000-25. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526272. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
9
Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预先医疗照护计划的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):477-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
10
The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial.预先医疗照护计划对老年患者临终关怀的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1345.