Hüttemann Eva, Muzalyova Anna, Gröhl Katharina, Nagl Sandra, Fleischmann Carola, Ebigbo Alanna, Classen Johanna, Wanzl Julia, Prinz Friederike, Mayr Patrick, Schnoy Elisabeth
Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):140. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010140.
Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a well-established and important therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the significance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with VDZ remains a contradictory field in daily clinical practice. Our study aims to clarify the predictive impact of VDZ drug levels in long-term clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort.
Patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) from a tertiary IBD referral center at the University Hospital Augsburg, Germany, were enrolled in this single-center retrospective data analysis. Clinical and endoscopic data were collected at month 6, month 12, and at the last time of follow-up, and outcomes were correlated with VDZ levels at week 6.
This study included 95 patients, 68.4% ( = 65) with UC, 24.2% ( = 23) with CD, and 7.4% ( = 7) with indeterminate colitis (CI). Patients with a mean VDZ treatment time of 17.83 months ± 14.56 showed clinical response in 29.5% ( = 28) and clinical remission in 45.3% ( = 43) at the end of the study. Endoscopic response occurred in 20.0% ( = 19) and endoscopic remission in 29.5% ( = 28) at the end of the study. The sustained beneficial effect of VDZ was also reflected in a significant change in biomarker levels. VDZ trough level at week 6 was determined in 48.4% ( = 46) with a mean of 41.79 µg/mL ± 24.58. A significant association between VDZ level at week 6 and both short and long-term outcomes could not be demonstrated. However, numerically higher VDZ levels were seen in patients with endoscopic and clinical improvement at month 6 and at the time of last follow-up.
This study demonstrated efficacy and safety for VDZ in a real-world cohort. Although, for some parameters, a clear trend for higher VDZ levels at week 6 was seen, the efficacy of VDZ was not significantly correlated to VDZ level at week 6, which questions the predictive value of VDZ levels in the real world.
维多珠单抗(VDZ)是治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的一种成熟且重要的治疗选择。然而,在日常临床实践中,VDZ治疗药物监测(TDM)的意义仍是一个存在争议的领域。我们的研究旨在阐明VDZ药物水平对真实世界队列中长期临床结局的预测影响。
来自德国奥格斯堡大学医院三级IBD转诊中心的中重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)患者被纳入这项单中心回顾性数据分析。在第6个月、第12个月以及最后一次随访时收集临床和内镜数据,并将结局与第6周时的VDZ水平进行关联分析。
本研究纳入95例患者,其中68.4%(n = 65)为UC患者,24.2%(n = 23)为CD患者,7.4%(n = 7)为不确定性结肠炎(CI)患者。平均VDZ治疗时间为17.83个月±14.56个月的患者在研究结束时临床缓解率为29.5%(n = 28),临床缓解率为45.3%(n = 43)。研究结束时内镜缓解率为20.0%(n = 19),内镜缓解率为29.5%(n = 28)。VDZ的持续有益作用也体现在生物标志物水平的显著变化上。第6周时测定了48.4%(n = 46)患者的VDZ谷浓度,平均值为41.79 µg/mL±24.58。第6周时的VDZ水平与短期和长期结局之间均未显示出显著相关性。然而,在第6个月和最后一次随访时内镜和临床改善的患者中,VDZ水平在数值上更高。
本研究证明了VDZ在真实世界队列中的疗效和安全性。尽管在某些参数方面,第6周时VDZ水平有升高的明显趋势,但VDZ的疗效与第6周时的VDZ水平无显著相关性,这对VDZ水平在现实世界中的预测价值提出了质疑。