Suppr超能文献

热身策略是否有自愿收缩对运动表现、小腿温度和血乳酸浓度的影响。

A warm-up strategy with or without voluntary contraction on athletic performance, lower-leg temperature, and blood lactate concentration.

机构信息

Division of Sports Science & Medicine, Graduate School of Physical Education, Athletic Training Laboratory, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.

Physical Education, Graduate School, Athletic Training Laboratory, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0295537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295537. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

It is unclear whether temperature-related warm-up effects can be accomplished by passive warm-up (e.g., by external heat). Therefore, this study compared the effects of two different warm-up protocols with and without voluntary contraction on subsequent sprinting and jumping performance. Eighteen healthy male collegiate students (23.3 ± 2.4 years, 173.8 ± 7.2 cm, 70.5 ± 9.3 kg) randomly experienced 10 min of active (jogging on a treadmill; belt speed: 9.0 km/h at a 1% incline) and passive warm-up (lying down in the warm-up chamber; inner ambient temperature set at 35°C) protocols, followed by ten sets of intermittent exercises in two separate sessions. Athletic performance, lower-leg muscle temperature, and blood lactate concentration were statistically compared using analysis of variance with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc comparisons. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were also calculated. There was no warm-up protocol effect over time on 20 m sprint times (condition × time: F9,323 = 1.26, p = 0.25). Maximal vertical jump heights were different (condition × time: F9,323 = 2.0, p = 0.04) such that subjects who performed the active warm-up protocol jumped higher (51.4 cm) than those who did the passive warm-up (49.2 cm, p = 0.04). There was a warm-up protocol effect over time on lower-leg muscle temperature (condition × time: F12,425 = 13.99, p<0.0001) in that there was a 5.5% and 5.8% increase after active (32.8 to 34.6°C, ES = 2.91) and passive (32.9 to 34.9°C, ES = 3.28) warm-up protocols, respectively. Blood lactate concentration was different (condition × time: F2,85 = 3.61, p = 0.03) since the values at the post-warm-up measurements were different between warm-up conditions (active: 4.1 mmol/L; passive: 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.004, ES = 1.69). Subsequent sprint and jump performance did not differ between the duration- and muscle temperature-matched active and passive warm-up protocols. Non-thermal effects from the warm-up activity may be minimal for sprinting and jumping performance in recreationally active males.

摘要

目前尚不清楚温度相关的热身效果是否可以通过被动热身(例如外部加热)来实现。因此,本研究比较了两种不同的热身方案,一种有自主收缩,另一种没有自主收缩,以评估它们对后续短跑和跳跃表现的影响。18 名健康的男性大学生(23.3±2.4 岁,173.8±7.2cm,70.5±9.3kg)随机接受 10 分钟的主动热身(在跑步机上慢跑;带速:9.0km/h,1%坡度)和被动热身(躺在预热室中;室内环境温度设定为 35°C),随后在两个不同的时间段内进行十组间歇运动。使用方差分析和 Tukey-Kramer 事后比较统计比较运动表现、小腿肌肉温度和血乳酸浓度。还计算了 Cohen's d 效应量(ES)。20m 冲刺时间在不同的热身方案和时间之间没有差异(条件×时间:F9,323=1.26,p=0.25)。最大垂直跳跃高度不同(条件×时间:F9,323=2.0,p=0.04),进行主动热身的受试者(51.4cm)比进行被动热身的受试者(49.2cm,p=0.04)跳得更高。小腿肌肉温度在不同的热身方案和时间之间存在差异(条件×时间:F12,425=13.99,p<0.0001),主动热身(32.8 至 34.6°C,ES=2.91)和被动热身(32.9 至 34.9°C,ES=3.28)后分别增加了 5.5%和 5.8%。血乳酸浓度不同(条件×时间:F2,85=3.61,p=0.03),因为热身条件下的后测值不同(主动:4.1mmol/L;被动:1.5mmol/L,p=0.004,ES=1.69)。在两种热身方案中,短跑和跳跃表现没有差异。在娱乐性活动的男性中,热身活动的非热效应可能对短跑和跳跃表现的影响最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f13/10783781/5d84824e59d3/pone.0295537.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验